Saskatchewan riding dispute roils MPs

Tease the day: Opposition crying foul of alleged Conservative gerrymandering

by Nick Taylor-Vaisey

AP/Kevin Ellis

There’s a kind of calm that’s taken hold in Ottawa. People are still yelling at each other and getting worked up about things, but the issues of the day are far removed from those explosive files that dominated the final week’s of last year’s sitting. Fighter jets and foreign investment, billion-dollar files both, had opposition and government clawing at each other. These days, in advance of a federal budget downplayed daily by the Minister of Finance, and in the absence of any looming economic or political crises, charges of good ‘ol fashioned gerrymandering has taken Centre Stage.

Here’s the story so far: a so-called “push poll” went out to Saskatchewan voters last week. The robo-voice wasn’t exactly enamoured with proposed riding boundary changes in Saskatchewan, which would see the demise of some of the pie-shaped, urban-rural ridings that dominate the province. The Conservative Party denied that it was behind the calls. Then it admitted it was behind the calls. The Prime Minister defended the calls. Tom Lukiwski, a Conservative MP in Saskatchewan, wasn’t happy about the calls. He pointed the finger at a prominent party operative in Ottawa. The opposition has had a field day with the file, claiming the governing party is unduly influencing the riding redistribution process (even though some opposition MPs have, in their own way, raised a stink about boundary changes in ridings near them—legitimately, they claim, and transparently). Maybe the charges are fair. Gerrymandering would be unfair, out of line, and even reprehensible. But surely, something bigger is coming. Right?


What’s above the fold this morning?

The Globe and Mail leads with Finance Minister Jim Flaherty’s prediction of little new spending in the next federal budget. The National Post fronts a Senate report on the price gap between Canadian and American consumer products. The Toronto Star goes above the fold with a “massive shakeup” among the leadership of the Canadian Forces. The Ottawa Citizen leads with the arrest of a man alleged to have murdered two Ottawa sex workers. iPolitics fronts Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney’s testimony to the U.K.’s treasury committee. CBC.ca leads with changes in Russia since the country last hosted the Olympic Games. National Newswatch showcases a CTV News story about Senator Patrick Brazeau using his father-in-law’s address to receive a tax exemption.


Stories that will be (mostly) missed

1. Chemical storage. The Mounties are worried about the potential liability posed by chemicals in police custody that could leak, explode or react in an “unforeseen” way.
2. Aboriginal affairs. The federal government will appeal a court’s ruling that Metis and non-status Indians should be included in the government’s definition of Indian.
3. Fracking. Quebec’s provincial government will table a bill that would place a moratorium on a controversial gas-extraction technique in the St. Lawrence Valley.
4. Charbonneau. Quebec’s ongoing inquiry into corruption in the construction industry heard more testimony from Joe Borsellino, a construction boss who denies wrongdoing.




Browse

Saskatchewan riding dispute roils MPs

  1. “Maybe the charges are fair. Gerrymandering would be unfair, out of line,
    and even reprehensible. But surely, something bigger is coming. Right?”
    What’s bigger than our elected officials lying to us, using a fictitious company to do a fake poll by robocall? If we can’t except the most basic level of honesty and decency from these people, where does that leave us? I think this is big.

    • opps, I meant to say, if we can’t expect the most basic level of decency

    • liberals are honest and cons are not,is that what you’re saying, some one some where might believe you if McDork hadn’t been premier of Ont for the last 9 yrs

  2. “But surely, something bigger is coming. Right?”

    What do you mean? nothing bigger is coming. The Conservatives lost support for this move, not gained it. This move lost support, not gained it. They want another election victory. In order to get one, they need to apologize and do nothing bigger or they’ll be toast (since I’m a Liberal, being toast is good news).

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *