Sex-selective abortion becomes issue in Tory leadership race

Pierre Lemieux and Brad Trost endorse debate on a dormant issue that could split the Conservatives

Pierre Lemieux, left, and Chris Alexander participate in the Conservative leadership candidates' bilingual debate in Moncton, N.B., on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016. (Andrew Vaughan/CP)

Pierre Lemieux, left, and Chris Alexander participate in the Conservative leadership candidates’ bilingual debate in Moncton, N.B., on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2016. (Andrew Vaughan/CP)

OTTAWA – A pair of Conservative leadership hopefuls say it’s time for Canada to have a free and open debate about sex-selective abortion — a position that’s raising concerns about the revival of old party divisions.

Pierre Lemieux, a former Ontario Tory MP, promised Sunday that under his leadership the Conservative platform will include a pledge to take action against sex-selective abortion. As prime minister, he vowed he would work to eliminate the practice.

“I believe it is wrong to end a pregnancy based solely on the belief that a baby girl is worth less than a baby boy,” Lemieux, one of the lower-profile hopefuls in the 14-candidate race, said in a new campaign video.

“As a father of four daughters, this issue is particularly close to my heart and I stand with those Canadians who have serious concerns about gender-selective abortion…

“I believe that politicians should have the courage to debate these issues in an open and respectful way.”

MORE: Scott Gilmore on the Conservatives’ contenders, clowns and clones

The issue of sex-selective abortion has been a source of controversy within the Conservative ranks in the past.

In 2013, about 20 Tory MPs were infuriated when fellow MP Mark Warawa’s motion condemning sex-selective abortion was blocked. The dispute eventually led MP Brent Rathgeber to quit the Conservative caucus.

Lemieux, who lost his seat in last year’s election, urged people who believe in a respectful debate on this type of issue to donate to his campaign.

Later Sunday, leadership rival Brad Trost applauded Lemieux for raising an issue that he says the party’s membership has voted to condemn. Trost says he’s also brought up the matter during the campaign.

“Pierre and I are endorsing party policy and I think the other candidates in the leadership race need to say, do they or do they not, support party policy when it comes to gender-selection abortion?” the veteran Saskatchewan MP said in an interview.

“Others will dodge and try not to answer the question and I don’t think that’s what real leaders do.”

Conservative strategist Michele Austin noted Sunday that while Lemieux’s position is consistent with his social-conservative views, she said she thought it was part of a strategy for him to get noticed. She worried his announcement could reopen old wounds within the party.

“I think that a lot of people will be disappointed that he’s going to go this hard and this fast on the issue of abortions — this early,” said Austin, a senior adviser with Summa Strategies.

“There’s a crowded field and everybody’s trying to get votes. So, from a strategic point of view we shouldn’t be surprised about it, but I think that a lot of Conservatives are going to be disappointed if this hijacks the agenda.”

Austin said she believes other leadership candidates support Lemieux and Trost’s position. However, so far she said the others have chosen either a “big-tent” approach or to raise the issue in a different way, at a different time.

“The joy under the Rona Ambrose leadership is that there hasn’t been any great divides in these kinds of social conservative issues and we’ve enjoyed this quiet time of rebuilding, where everybody is free to pursue their interests and their own beliefs,” she said.

“It’s an exciting time to be in the party.”

A spokesman for Maxime Bernier’s leadership campaign said Sunday that the Quebec MP prefers to keep his personal views on this matter to himself. However, Bernier respects and supports the democratic right of any MP who wishes to raise the issue and to vote on it freely, Maxime Hupe said.

During his time in office, former Conservative prime minister Stephen Harper said that his government did everything it could to avoid reopening the abortion debate.

Some studies have suggested that sex-selective abortion could be an issue in Canada.

In April, research published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal found that Indian-born women in Canada with two or more children had been giving birth to more baby boys than expected. The researchers suggested abortions related to sex selection may have been a major reason.


Sex-selective abortion becomes issue in Tory leadership race

  1. Sigh….Cons never learn. It’s amazing. Over and over again….

    So few Canadians are evangelical….yet Cons keep acting like everyone is.

  2. This party is only looking to govern for one part of our country, and that is the west, with some hope from parts of Ontario. Now that O’Leary has sown the seeds of doubt about not having to speak french as PM, this stuff(sex selected abortion), mind you, this is 2 men telling women what they can, and cannot do with their bodies, is just windowing dressing for what Canadians can be in store for in the the next election. O’Leary opened his mouth once in the last month, and has alienated about 10 million people from the next election(Quebec, and other French enclaves in the country), with his so call ‘Basket of Deplorable’s’ (french speaking people, i love the french). If you can’t get your party on the same page in Canada, you need to try another country, maybe Russia, or even Saudi Arabia, they would love these guys to run over there. At least Trudeau made it clear with his MPs running in the last election, if you have issues that will challenge our constitution in courts, than their is no room in the liberal party on his watch. Just imagine, this circus could be rolling into your town soon, but it really needs a ringmaster, not a bunch of clowns.

    • Just wanted to be clear, i love french speaking Canada, its a part of the fabric and character of the country, it’s what makes us so different from other countries, that we as a country, can tolerate and live in a bilingual society that doesn’t infringe on our daily lives. This is definitely one of the biggest mistakes a federal party can make if they want to be elected,is to disassociate themselves from what has been a party of our countries tapestry. English speaking people and other speaking languages of this country won’t stand for this kind of division. ‘United we Stand, Divided we Fall’, i know it is a cliche, but it’s still a good cliche.

  3. Sex-selective abortion is a major issue in Indian communities here in Canada. Personally, I think it’s reprehensible. Well, I consider abortion itself to be reprehensible, unless for the safety of the mother obviously. It should be legal though. But if it were up to me, and of course it’s not, it would be legal only in the first trimester. How the hell anyone can wait until a baby has been growing inside them for 20 weeks, then have her killed when they find out it’s a girl is beyond me. That’s not aborting your fetus, that’s killing your baby. What a twisted set of morals.

    However, if we allow abortions that far along into the pregnancy, the woman’s motivation for getting the abortion doesn’t matter. It’s not anybody’s business but her own. So we either move the cut off period for abortions to before the sex of the baby can be determined – and I don’t see that happening any time soon – or we accept these sex-selective abortions as a fact of life. The Conservatives shouldn’t really be wasting any time with this imo.