The children, our future

Liveblogging Canada’s Next Great Prime Minister



Welcome to our Canada’s Next Great Prime Minister liveblog. Just like being there. Even if we’re not. And the show was actually taped last month.

7:51pm. Catching the last ten minutes of Jeopardy. Accepting that there’s something to be said for the CBC not spending its precious public dollars on American programming, surely there’s an exception to be made for Jeopardy, a show that screens for knowledge and lucratively rewards nothing more than intelligence and a quick thumb reflex. All things considered, it’s altogether remarkable that it’s still on television. There’s nothing remotely like it on network television. It and Fareed Zakaria’s GPS are the only things still separating us from the apes.

7:56pm. In the CNGPM promo they keep showing, Paul Martin observes that Canadians are looking for leadership but just aren’t seeing it. Not that that he’s had anything to do with that.

7:58pm. What is pop? No, gospel. Elvis won all his Grammys in the gospel category. Interesting.

8:00pm. Show opens with Alex Trebek getting his makeup done and mocking his own ego. Fine start.

8:01pm. Alex introduces our moderators—Brian Mulroney, Kim Campbell, Paul Martin and Joe Clark. Three prime ministers most noted for their failing and another who is about to be the subject of an inquiry into his relationship with a German arms dealer.

8:05pm. The candidates are introduced. One is the mascot for the local junior hockey team. Seems about right.

8:09pm. First challenge is to give a 30-second speech. Fourth candidate declares himself a “passionate, principled nerd,” waves his arms erratically and asks voters to “take it or leave it.” This young man learned nothing from the Stephane Dion era.

8:14pm. For the record, that young man was David Suk. And in the audience polling, he finished fourth with 18% of the vote. The early leader is Robert Marsh with 34%.

8:17pm. Now, “The Debate.” The question: Is the party system doomed? Amy Marlene Robichaud admits she doesn’t “get” what happened in Parliament late last year. Suk pitches proportional representation. Kim Campbell looks confused. Paul Martin appears flummoxed. Brian Mulroney lectures Suk on the political situation in Israel. Robichaud argues MPs should resign if they find their conscience disagrees with the wishes of their constituents. And now we’re talking about capital punishment. Mulroney v. Turner remains the last time a Canadian political debate was even mildly useful.

8:26pm. Robichaud takes that challenge with 39% of the vote, Marsh second, then Gabriel Brian Lopez. Suk goes down to 14%.

8:27pm. Now, “The Crisis.” Contestants are presented with dire situations and given 30 seconds to explain what they’d do. Suk gets the ticking time bomb scenario and is asked whether he would authorize torture. Suk says he wouldn’t, because it doesn’t work. Mulroney appears to sort of give his blessing.

8:30pm. Gabriel is asked what he’d do if his son illegally hacked into the leader of the opposition’s email account. Gabriel says he wouldn’t turn his son in. Mulroney says, “wrong answer.” Gabriel asks him if he’d turn in Ben Mulroney. Mulroney says no, but seems to say he might offer up one of his other sons.

8:32pm. Marsh gets a terrorist scenario—whether to negotiate or not. Marsh says no. Martin says the answer is right, but the premise is wrong and he would negotiate.

8:33pm. Robichaud is asked whether she’d spare a pedophile from the death penalty in another country. She says she’d have him repatriated. Martin says she’s correct. Mulroney and Clark too. So basically we’re all for ignoring political expediency in the face of national ideals. It all seems so easy.

8:39pm. Suk is down to 2%. Lopez is at 3%. Marsh is down to 30%. Robichaud is up to 65%.

8:40pm. The audience is apparently a demographically representative sample of Canada, by the way. Just in case you were assuming it was a bunch of downtown Toronto socialists.

8:41pm. Kim Campbell suggests that it’s best not to be “quirky.” Joe Clark acknowledges that Mulroney was better at drawing supporters than he was. Martin waxes philosophical on democracy. All of them are much more likable now that there’s no threat of them running for office again.

8:44pm. Now, “The Final Appeal.” Gabriel talks about ethnicity and unity. Suk does his best Stephane Dion impression. Marsh says he “knows what everyone is feeling” and wants to restore faith in politics. Robichaud proclaims her love for this country. And the final vote… right after this.

8:50pm. Suk and Lopez finish in the bottom two. And because they clearly didn’t plan on the rest of the show going so quickly, they cut to another commercial before announcing the winner. One of those commercials turns out to be the one for Cheetah energy drink with Ben Johnson.

8:54pm. Here’s a theory: It’s impossible for anyone under 30 to get involved in politics on this level and not seem at least somewhat ridiculous. Their idea of who they’re supposed to be, how they’re supposed to act, inevitably exceeds their actual grasp, knowledge or life experience. A bit like a little kid playing dress-up. Arguably no one should be allowed run for office until they’re 35.

8:58pm. Finally, the results. Robichaud wins with 50%, to Marsh’s 35%. She gets $50,000, which she and her fiance are going to use to buy a home.

And it’s all over. Bit like watching an election on speed. But would anyone—politicians, voters, journalists—object to all elections being conducted like this—taped and edited into a one-hour special hosted by a game show host? Probably not.


The children, our future

  1. That was just painful. David Suk apparently thought he was running against Dick Cheney (How many times to he bring up torture?). Gabriel Brian Lopez basically said he would lie to the Canadian public about his knowledge of a scandal and, much to my amusement, was scolded for it by Brian Mulroney. Robert Marsh, after observing the previous two, presumably decided he could probably win by keeping his mouth shut and saying nothing controversial (usually a safe strategy in the real thing but not on a game show) which meant Amy Marlene Robichaud basically won by default largely for claiming, like every politician who has never made a decision, that she has principles dammit. Her and Stephen Harper. What can we expect in the future? Looks like more of the same.

    • Well, it’s a gameshow. And the name seems to imply that the winner will become the next PM, which obviously isn’t the case, so how can anyone really take it seriously? I still appreciate the fact the participants particpated, but that’s really all I can see from this as being positive. Still it would be interesting if our real politicians had to go through things like this more often.

      • I agree. It’s all for fun and I actually enjoyed watching it. What I found most interesting about the whole excercise is how the contestants thought they needed to portray themselves to “the voters” and how those voters responded to those portrayals. Gabriel Brian Lopez gave the most honest answer to a tough question, that he would cover up a scandal involving his son. A decision that I think when actually confronted with it, alot of us would actually make (by pretending we knew nothing) but never admit to, and was resoundly thrashed in the voting for his honesty. I think it totally explains why our politicians are rather loose with the truth. Why tell the truth to a tough question if it only means you’re going to lose?

  2. What a joke of a show. none of these ‘Young Canadians’ will ever be Prime Ministers. Isn’t it obvious? It’s never the ones who come from bottom up who make it.

  3. $50 000? You’ve got the wrong channel, Aaron. That’s the Giller Prize.

  4. It’s soooo embarrassing. For God’s sake, just make it stop! Muroney, Clark, Cambell, Martin…what a bunch. It’s to weep. Auggggg

  5. LOL – Mulroney advising the young man about turning his son in – you know, about honesty. Too funny, Brian Mulroney advising about honesty, right and wrong.

  6. If only it were that simple to become prime minister. History will confirm our suspicions that the priveledged and few rule.

  7. I have been advised by at least three people in the past to apply for this.

    I have never done so. It’s important to remember that this is basically entertainment programming. This is not where policy is debated and solutions settled on (or fought divisively over).

    But, I would argue that your theory about people under 30 seeming ridiculous isn’t entirely incorrect. Instead, I would say people /over/ 30 think people under 30 are ridiculous, and pretty much would never entertain the idea of voting for someone that young.

    Also, banning people under 35 from running for office would be pretty silly. We already have a problem with young people not caring about politics. Not letting those who are interested run is not going to increase voter turnout. Politics is already entirely too much of an old people’s club, mostly of the white male variety.

  8. I think you folks are missing the point. Mr. Stronach started the competition with the idea of feuling debate, of encouraging young people to bring forth their ideas and engage in society, and if you look at the entire competition it does that. These four finalist have all put forth interesting and relevant ideas over the course of the competition, more than that, they all have a real passion for our country.

    I think its amazing how easy it is for so many people to ignore the obvious passion and commitment these people have for our country and to dismiss the whole thing as “some show”. Its that type of response that keeps young people out of politics.