Thomas Mulcair is everyone's target. Here's how he plans to win.

Mulcair is everyone’s target. Here’s how he plans to win.

Thomas Mulcair forced the Liberals to move left. Now he’s chasing the Conservative vote. Paul Wells on the man to beat, with miles to go before he sleeps

Photograph by cole garside

Thomas Mulcair. (Photograph by Cole Garside)

On Aug. 27 I caught up with Thomas Mulcair’s NDP campaign bus, for the second time in this odd election season, in what threatens to become our regular meeting spot: a desolate stretch of Eglinton Avenue in Toronto, where a former Saskatchewan finance minister, Andrew Thomson, is running for Parliament.

Thomson’s candidacy, like much of the paraphernalia of the Mulcair campaign, is an example of leaden means in pursuit of romantic ends. What the NDP is trying to do here is unprecedented. The way they are going about it is as unsexy as, well, Tom Mulcair.

No New Democrat has ever been elected to represent Eglinton–Lawrence. It used to be a Liberal bastion. An Anglican clergyman named Roland de Corneille held it for the party through most of the 1980s, fending off the Mulroney onslaught of 1984. Finally Joe Volpe took the nomination from de Corneille in 1988, through the riding’s traditional means of succession: internecine organizational battles among Liberals. Volpe then represented the riding for, if we’re being honest, altogether too long before the Conservatives’ Joe Oliver managed to end the Liberal era on his second try in the 2011 election. Oliver went on to become Stephen Harper’s second finance minister.

NDP Leader Tom Mulcair speaks to supporters along with candidate Andrew Thomson, left, during a campaign stop in Toronto on Thursday, August 27, 2015. (Frank Gunn/CP)

NDP Leader Tom Mulcair speaks to supporters along with candidate Andrew Thomson, left, during a campaign stop in Toronto on Thursday, August 27, 2015. (Frank Gunn/CP)

To win Eglinton–Lawrence, Andrew Thomson, who does not live in the riding and who has only recently returned to Canada from overseas, will have to leapfrog past both the incumbent and the entrenched Liberals. The previous NDP candidate here won less than 12 per cent of the vote in 2011. Thomson’s got his work cut out for him.

Related: An interview with Andrew Thomson

He’ll have help. “We’ll be here every week,” a Mulcair staffer said to me as I wandered into Thomson’s storefront campaign headquarters.

There, indeed, was Mulcair, a former Quebec environment minister next to the former Saskatchewan finance minister, and already you could see some of the method in this madness. Two seasoned political pros, standing side by side to complement each other’s credibility.

“I can tell you in this riding, there are two choices to defeat Joe Oliver,” Thomson said, acknowledging the Liberal, lawyer Marco Mendicino, who defeated the confusing ex-Conservative Eve Adams for that party’s nomination here. “But there is only one option if you want to defeat Stephen Harper and put a new government in place in Ottawa. And that is to vote NDP . . . ” The rest of his remarks were drowned out by applause from local supporters.

And you know what? Maybe they will. Vote NDP, I mean. Not just here in the concrete expanses of Eglinton–Lawrence but across Ontario, the campaign’s most important battleground province, and beyond. If the big crowds and the early polls are any indication, 2015 could be an even bigger election for the NDP than the breakthrough of 2011.

Later that day, in a brief interview before an evening rally in Brantford, Mulcair would list some of the high points: the day the crowd reached the fire-code capacity at the Refined Fool Brewing Co. in Sarnia, or the throng that turned out in a park in Perth. At the latter event, Mulcair said, “Some of the old-timers who’d been around, working in the party for 40 or 50 years, told me, ‘Listen. Tommy Douglas came here. Ed Broadbent came here. We had big meetings: Sixteen, eighteen people!’ ” This time, he said, “We had 450 people on a hot Friday afternoon. And people were excited. They sensed that something is happening.”

As I cut that interview short so he could get back to campaigning, Mulcair added: “And I’m excited. You can add that.” Well, good. I’m glad we cleared that up. Because the evidence of excitement from his campaign-trail body language and discourse is intermittent.

“Toronto is the most important city in Canada,” he told the crowd at Andrew Thomson’s campaign HQ. “It’s home to 80,000 new immigrants who come to Toronto every year to pursue their dreams. The GTA is home to over three million highly educated and skilled workers who make up nearly one-sixth of Canada’s entire workforce and boasts 40 per cent of corporate headquarters in Canada.” He sounded like Siri, reading a Wikipedia entry on Toronto aloud for an iPhone user on handsfree. “Produces over 15 per cent of Canada’s GDP.”

Related: Read an excerpt of Thomas Mulcair’s book, Strength of Conviction

There is a school of thought, among people who watched this campaign closely even through the August doldrums, which believes Mulcair has been slouchy and low-energy for a front-runner. Partly this is who he is, and since you and I can be slouchy and low-energy too at times, it is hard to begrudge him his moments. But there is also some calculation in it. Each new voter the NDP is chasing this year is his or her own private Eglinton–Lawrence, somebody who has not voted NDP recently and may never have. Mulcair is hunting the fabled “blue-orange switcher,” that rare, but not unheard-of creature who doesn’t want to vote Liberal but who hesitates between Conservatives and New Democrats as champions of ordinary folks.

You don’t hunt those votes with flash and dazzle. In fact, a boisterous outsider will scare blue-orange switchers away. You need to reassure them. Lull them. Remind them of the leaders Ontario voters have supported in the past: Bill Davis, Mike Harris, Jean Chrétien, Stephen Harper. Plodders you could trust with the keys, whatever their policy stance.

“Change is only appetizing when you have an alternative you can turn to,” a senior Mulcair adviser told me before this campaign began. This may sound like a stretch, but Mulcair’s position is like Barack Obama’s in the 2008 and 2012 United States presidential elections. Like Obama then, if Mulcair now says something to excite his dedicated voter base, he could scare off the next skittish rookie NDP voter on whom victory depends.

Related: Marshall Ganz, who worked on Obama ’08, on ‘snowflake’ organizing

This is one reason why Mulcair is so intent on running as an advocate of balanced budgets. By coincidence, I followed him on a day when the Liberal leader, Justin Trudeau, delivered one of this race’s big surprises: that a Liberal government would run $10-billion deficits for its first two years in office, then something smaller in its third year, before eliminating the deficit in his fourth, should Trudeau even be lucky enough to see four years as prime minister.

It’s a flanking move. Even as Mulcair shores up his managerial credibility by practically stapling himself to Andrew Thomson, Trudeau calls for big infrastructure spending, and to heck with balanced budgets. Mulcair is chasing Harper’s supporters. Trudeau is after Mulcair’s, a fox in the lefty henhouse.

Related: An economist explains what he thinks about when considering infrastructure spending

Mulcair is learning that higher hopes bring bigger obstacles. The NDP leader has become his opponents’ target much earlier than Layton ever did. Partly because there is more of the old-time backroom pol and less of the leprechaun in Mulcair than in Layton, his opponents were quick to get over any reticence in their attacks. Day after day, Trudeau has been deriding Mulcair as a man who would let the needy twist in the wind. Harper has ordered up a suite of ads that decry Mulcair’s supposed addiction to “reckless spending.” Having sought the policy middle and the centre of attention, he has arrived only to find himself surrounded.

Taking questions from reporters at Thomson’s headquarters, Mulcair was asked about Trudeau’s plan. For once some anger flashed. “I’m tired of watching governments put that debt on the backs of future generations,” he said. “Stephen Harper’s approach has always been, ‘live for today, let tomorrow take care of itself.’ Well, at some point, you have to start having different priorities.” The Liberals don’t, he said.

How could Mulcair balance the books while spending more in some areas? By spending less elsewhere, he said. Harper “subsidized oil companies to the tune of billions of dollars. We won’t do that. He spent a billion dollars fighting First Nations,” in court cases over resource projects. “We won’t do that. He’s spent a billion dollars on the Senate. We would try and make sure that Canadians never spend another penny on that.” Big applause for that last line. Shuttering the Senate would require the unanimous consent of all provincial legislatures, so it might be some time before Mulcair could get that job done. Maybe never. Never, for my money, is a good bet. But the sentiment was popular with this room.

Ontario matters in this race because it’s home to 121 ridings, one more than Quebec and British Columbia combined. But also because all three of the traditional big parties are competitive here, so there are close fights in dozens of ridings. It was three-way splits that accounted for much of the Conservatives’ success in 2011. They won many of their 73 Ontario seats because New Democrats and Liberals divided the larger anti-Conservative vote. To win again the Conservatives must hold many of those seats. To end the Harper era, Liberals and New Democrats must take them. Other campaigns have been won in the air as leaders bounced from province to province seeking advantage. This one will be fought to a great extent on buses, in the 905 area code around Toronto and in southern Ontario.

The NDP remains in the lead nationwide, but it has seen a dip in support in the past two weeks that must unnerve its supporters, especially in Ontario, according to a new Abacus Data poll released this week. The NDP’s national level of support is down four points to 31 per cent, edging out the Conservatives at 30 per cent and the Liberals at 29 per cent. In Ontario, the NDP has lost six points to 26 per cent, putting them in third place behind the Conservatives at 33 per cent and the Liberals at 34 per cent.

Screen Shot 2015-08-30 at 8.45.47 PM

But the NDP has formidable strengths. In the year and a half since January 2014, the proportion of the population who would consider voting NDP, regardless of whom they support right now, has grown six points to 62 per cent, Abacus found. This potential vote has shrunk for the Liberals during the same period, from 60 per cent to 55 per cent, and for the Conservatives, from 45 per cent to 42 per cent. This suggests the Conservatives, in particular, have very little room to grow beyond their current support.

And the more Canadians get to know Mulcair, the more they seem to like him. In exclusive polling for Maclean’s, Abacus found that Mulcair has overtaken Harper on a range of questions designed to test respondents’ attitudes toward leaders. In January a plurality of voters thought Harper, of the three big party leaders, would be best to negotiate a contract on their behalf; advise respondents on how to invest their money; and have good ideas for children about their future. Mulcair has gained on Harper on all those questions, overtaking him as a hypothetical contract negotiator and child career counsellor. (By a wide margin, respondents still believe Trudeau would be best if they needed a political leader to cook a meal or pick a movie to watch.)

With the stakes so high, the players sometimes call in reinforcements. Mulcair’s is Thomson, the former Saskatchewan budget-maker who helps compensate for the incumbent NDP caucus’s limited supply of cabinet timber. When he faced the same problem in 2006, Harper campaigned with Bill Davis, the legendary former Ontario premier. When he needed a Toronto breakthrough in 2011, Harper campaigned with Rob Ford, who was then the city’s not-yet-humiliated mayor.

Trudeau has recruited Kathleen Wynne, the Ontario premier who surprised a lot of people by winning re-election last year. She managed the feat despite the weight of scandal over two gas plants her predecessor Dalton McGuinty cancelled to improve his own electoral chances, at horrendous cost to the taxpayer. And she did it even though several members of the Harper cabinet decried her plan to add a compulsory-contribution provincial pension to supplement the Canada Pension Plan.

Plainly neither Harper nor Wynne view her re-election as having settled the matter. She has already appeared twice with Trudeau and will do so again. Her chief campaign strategist, David Herle, is working for Trudeau this summer. In an interview with Maclean’s she was extraordinarily blunt about wanting to see Harper defeated, and by Trudeau, not Mulcair.

Recent polls suggest more Ontarians disapprove of Wynne’s government than approve, and it was fashionable to predict her support would backfire against Trudeau. Trudeau’s early, tentative success belies that prediction. Wynne’s many detractors were unlikely to take Trudeau seriously under any circumstance, and of her outnumbered admirers, he needed only a fraction to improve his own standing markedly. That’s what seems to have happened.

NDP leader Tom Mulcair speaks before signing copies of his new book "Strength of Conviction" in Toronto Monday, August 10, 2015. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Galit Rodan

NDP leader Tom Mulcair speaks before signing copies of his new book “Strength of Conviction” in Toronto Monday, August 10, 2015. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Galit Rodan

In recent days all three party leaders have been buzzing around Ontario, and the Green party’s Elizabeth May was preparing to leave her British Columbia redoubt to join the Ontario fray. Mulcair was born in Ottawa but has made his career in Quebec. Through long experience, beginning when he ran to succeed Jack Layton after his predecessor’s shocking death four years ago, he has become familiar with Ontario, a province many Quebecers know only vaguely and, as neighbours often do, through a haze of preconceptions.

“This is my sixth visit, here, in this town,” he said in Brantford before his evening rally. “So I’ve had a chance to get to know people. You get a sense of place.”

Related: Our long interview with Thomas Mulcair

He talked about his early days as the young director of Quebec’s Office des Professions, taking on the province’s college of physicians and surgeons over the sexual abuse of patients by doctors. He talked about his decision to walk away from Jean Charest’s cabinet rather than let condominiums be built in a provincial park. “So that’s my background too. That’s who I am. That’s the inner drive I have that—I guess values is sometimes a word that’s overused, but really, that’s what it is.” He was self-conscious. This business of self-promotion can make anyone look silly. It made him tentative, searching for his words. “It’s the fire in the belly to stand up and do the right thing.”

It is churlish to deny any political leader the belief that they are doing the right thing. They all do, and the challenge each faces is that they are under fire from the rest, and that this dispute is being litigated with particular intensity in the cafés and community halls of the country’s biggest province. Six more weeks of this lie ahead. Whoever wins, if any of them even captures enough seats to make a credible claim of victory, will have fought hard to earn it.


Mulcair is everyone’s target. Here’s how he plans to win.

  1. I fear Thomson’s legacy will be ensuring an Oliver win.

  2. I remember the MSM going after Trudeau for parachuting in candidates, but as I can see the dippers have no shortage of parachutes either, while Mulcairs is trying to shadow box his way through tough and hard questions about his policies. Has anyone bothered to ask Mulcair how he plans to pass all of his policies, if he plans to remove the senate. I mean how does Mulcair plan to pass a bill to dismantle the senate in his first hundred days, if he has to put the bill before the senate to have it passed, square that circle for me please, especially if he doesn’t get a majority. Mulcair has boxed himself in so many times with his policy announcements, he can’t square his circles. The MSM has done everything to Trudeau, but pick his nose over not having any policy, well now he has policy up the ying yang and is running a deficit to help pay for most of it, but we still have no clue where Thom is coming up with the big bucks in order to keep public service jobs full tilt, and keep all of the pie in the sky promises he pandered his way to. He is doing the same thing Harper is doing, Blowing smoke up the MSM and voters derrieres. I still see 2 Dr. Jekylls/Mr. Hydes, Thom and Steve. Penting up their anger, until re-elected or elected.

  3. Paul Wells’ dislike of the Liberals is ruining his reporting. A few years ago, when I first started reading him, he didn’t like Paul Martin, and he came right out and said it, something like, “I just don’t like the guy”. Now he just attempts to weave trivializing statements about Trudeau into the narrative, but he doesn’t come clean as admirably as in the Martin days. At least then he still seemed to have a grasp that journalists should report their bias.

    Apart from that, this article uses statements from clips that have already been public. He saw Mulcair “showing a flash of anger” as though, off the cuff, he said “I’m tired of governments…off the backs…of future generations…” blah blah blah. I saw the calculated trope of the world-weary politician. And a furtive attempt by Paul Wells to make a bunch of leftovers from a couple of weeks ago look like in-depth journalism.

    • DIJON….

      Apparently, a lot of people had the same opinion of Paul Martin. thats why he was turfed shortly thereafter. The guy was disigenious, and pathetically grovelled to any group or cause he thought would get him a vote. People can see insincerity (non-Liberals anyway).

      As for Mulcair showing a “flash of anger”…well of course he did. Everyone did. That’s why he is known as “Angry Tom”. Why do you think Mulcair is trying so hard to contain himself on the campain trail? It is not his nature to be caring or kind.

      That is why it looks like he’s ready for a painful bowel movement every time he tries to smile. Each time he smiles…… looks like he’s trying it out for the first time.

      • Don’t expect Wells to support anyone to the right of Vladimir Lenin ..his current hero is Mealy mouthed Tom Mulcair who waxes wistfully over the tragic demise of a homeless refugee child , dead because of ISIS thugs. ..yet turns his back on the valiant Iraqi Kurds, the most effective anti-ISIS force in the region, by threatening to withdraw Canadian combat forces, without whom the Kurds could easily become dead meat….go Panda…go Panda…our new N.W. Calgary Superhero that stopped Alberta Socialists in their tracks…Brian Jeans long march to Edmonton has begun…do not repeat Alberta’s folly by electing this Coward Mulcair with a protest vote…

    • C’mon! What’s to like about the Liberals – or the NDP for that matter? The Libs present a dynasty candidate to many who hate the name; the NDP present a turncoat Irish-Quebecer trying to ride on Layton’s coat-tails. Only a Quebecer (which I once was) understands how the Catholic-Irish do NOT mesh with Catholic-French – but then again religion is not what it once was in Quebec.

      I suspect that the NDP rush to the centre will find few there, the rest having moved right to Harper or left to Trudeau. But then again it’s not my career as it is for Paul Wells.

  4. Please get rid of the CONs and please do not vote in this welfare state idiot Mulcair – this guy will bloat government, introduce massive tax increases for his ridiculous “promises” and kill the private sector – a government-heavy working force cannot sustain anything – the private sector is what drives the economy. I can’t understand people who are sucked into this rhetoric thinking that the rich should foot the bill for everyone. I am not rich but I understand that they are burdened with the vast majority of the tax base. The wealthy already pay the majority of taxes in Canada. The top 1% of income earners paid a staggering 21.2% of the total federal and provincial taxes in 2010. The top 10% paid 54.8% of all taxes while the bottom 50% of Canadian income earners contributed 4% towards the collective personal tax bill. And why should they foot the entire bill for everyone else. Most of the so-called wealthy worked hard to get where they are. You want a welfare state basically where no one prospers and expect hard working people who have earned it to dole all of it out to equalize things? You call that a democracy? Pure crap. Go away NDP.

    • ABBERS… are a fine example of double-think.

      you want to get rid of the Conservatives….but they are the party that understands everything you just wrote. You also don’t want the NDP, because you clearly lay out the socialist mindset, and what they would do to ruin the economy.

      clearly, this means you think the only option is the Liberal party under Trudeau. (or the Greens?). But if you noticed; the Liberals under Trudeau are even further to the left than today’s NDP. If you think Mulcair would be a nightmare….just imagine an ex-snow board instructor as the manager for the economy.

      Bear in mind….Trudeau doesn’t come up with any of his own ideas. He is the leader because of his name, and his name only. we all know this; even those who will vote Liberal know he’s a lightweight. That means the ideas used if Trudeau becomes the PM will simply be the ideas of his handlers. Gerald Butts, Alexandre Trudeau, Kathlynn Wynne..etc…etc…

      Gerald Butts …extreme environmentalist who gave Ontario the Green Energy act; resulting in huge energy cost increases, which resulted in lost jobs, and businesses leaving the provine.
      his brother – a “documentary” film maker….who only seems to make movies about how rotten those silly Jews in israel are. (why else would Trudeau spend so much time after the Muslim vote)
      Kathlynn Wynne……bad decisions and judgements too numerous to mention.

      Sorry Abbers…..but if harper loses, I’ll hope for the nutty (but pretty smart) Mulcair over the incompetent puppet currently leading the Liberals. We all know that Mulcair doesn’t mean much of what he says (he needs to keep his Quebec MP’s if he hopes to be PM) and that many of his policies won’t work. Even mulcair knows they won’t work, which is why he won’t actually enact them. Trudea on the other hand, seems to believe whatever he is told, and he may actually try to bring those policies in.

      • I am in favour of none of them – no matter what happens this country is royally screwed. I crap on Mulcair simply because he is promising the world without any indication of a solid economic plan. Did I say anywhere I am in favour of Trudeau – no. Wynne and the Libs have destroyed Ontario, no question about that and if JT follows down that path we are in trouble. I am commenting on an article about Mulcair and so sorry that I didn’t attack Trudeau as well. The plight of this country is in the hands of incompetence from all three major parties which in the big picture is all that counts at this time. We can only hope that a minority government will prevail. At least that will keep things in check for the most part. Heaven help us all if a majority happens. Why is it so wrong to admit that there really isn’t a party to vote for? Peewee Herman withstanding…lol. Let’s just hope that we get the best of the worst.

        • Abbers,

          Your cynicism is pretty much status quo from what I have seen. That being said, I have travelled extensively, and I can say without a doubt that the country is definitely not “screwed”. In fact, we are pretty much at the top of the heap when it comes to quality of life. This is not the result of any ONE Government……it is the result of the majorithy of the people who live here.

          there is a chief in the West, and he leads one of the best reserves in Canada. He has a quote that pretty much sums up what he believes, and what he tells his people. You should pay heed. The quote is, “If your life sucks… is because YOU suck”.

          Pretty much sums it up.

          Abbers…….stop sucking. You’ll enjoy life more.

    • You are not making any sense ….you want to get rid of Harper…you call Mulcair a welfare state idiot….you are against big government and taxing the rich, that outs Trudeau…who DO you favour in this dogfight…Peewee Herman is not running….

  5. Mulcair seems to be a target of the other parties; but not a target of the journalists on his campaign. None of them seem to question Mulcairs campaign speech content, when clearly much of it is an outright falsehood; and easily shown to be so. The media on the liberal and NDP campaigns lob softball questions, knowing exactly what the answer will be. Granted, that is the only kind of Question trudeau could answer….but Tom would do better.

    Not a single journalist has followed up on Mulcairs claim that over 400,000 manufacturing jobs were lost due to “Harper’s failed policies”……..when the truth is plain to see. Most mfg. jobs lost were in Ontario. they started to disappear shortly after the Liberals were elected in Ontario; mainly due to idiotic GREEN policy. Now Trudeau, under Wynne’s direction, wants to do the same thing to all of Canada.

    If the media wants to be taken seriously….then they need to take their job seriously and start asking tough questions, and following up when they are fed piffle; such as Mulcair seems to provide.

    • after the refugee fiasco coupled Mulcair’s new campaign promise to withdraw Canadian combat troops frpm Iraq and replace them with Social Workers….just watch the media distance themselves…..The anti-Harper… anti-Trudeau media crusade threw the undecideds Mulcair’s way as long as he kept his trap shut…however he was unable to keep his ego under wraps and his political suicide is now underway…

      • Brent,

        don’t be so sure. The kinds of folks who would like to see Mulcair and the NDP in power, only care about this dead Kurdish boy insomuch as they can use it to criticize Harper.

        I’m pretty sure the majority of them don’t give a damn about the dead kid…… long as they see a chance to get some freebies.

  6. Tom Mulcair has the wind at his back.
    There is a momentum that is compelling from here on Vancouver Island to Atlantic Canada!
    Harper and Harper-lite aka Justin will divide the free market ideologues while Tom attracts progressives in every region.

  7. The nations in the world have failed to solve the problem of ISIS Islamic state aggressively as a result all nations in the west are facing the Muslim INVASION TO THE WEST !! This is strategically planned by ISIS and all Islamic nations so in couple few years all these nations in the west will have some thing called HOME GROWN TERRORISM. US ( boston bombing , 911 etc ) france ( Charlie hebdo etc ) Canada ( train derailment that was caught by Canadian security, innocent Canadian captian Cirillo etc ) UK ( has lots of examples)all are an example. These refugees are like parasites that will suck up all our taxes and bomb OUR FUTURE GENERATIONS pretty soon . ISIS WILL BE ACTIVE IN OUR NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMUNITY. Canadians need to get out and vote for their own SECURITY first . NDP AND LIBERALS are demolishing Canadian military !!!!!!!!!!! and inviting these Trojan horse ( REFUGEES ) which will invariably put all Canadians at risk of just not their own life but the welfare of WHOLE CANADA at large !! All Justin and Tom M are doing is bad politics for the seat of PM grabbing muslim vote bank !!

  8. The nations in the world have failed to solve the problem of ISIS Islamic state aggressively as a result all nations in the west are facing the Muslim INVASION TO THE WEST !! This is strategically planned by ISIS and all Islamic nations so in couple few years all these nations in the west will have some thing called HOME GROWN TERRORISM. US ( boston bombing , 911 etc ) france ( Charlie hebdo etc ) Canada ( train derailment that was caught by Canadian security) UK ( has lots of examples)all are an example. These refugees are like parasites that will suck up all our taxes and bomb OUR FUTURE GENERATIONS in near future, ISIS WILL BE ACTIVE IN OUR NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMUNITY. Canadians need to get out and vote for their own SECURITY first . NDP AND LIBERALS are demolishing Canadian military !!!!!!!!!!! and inviting these Trojan horse ( REFUGEES ) which will invariably put all Canadians at risk of just not their own life but the welfare of WHOLE CANADA at large !!
    For election we Canadians should focus on canadian problems and not make the refugee issue as a sole seat winner for either candidates. These Syrian or ISIS have rapped hundred’s of young girls and daughters ,beheaded numerous innocent lives what about them are we not responsible , are we trying to invite more problem by not screening them , is our security not imp first . who knows ISIS guys are not coming , they sure are .NDP ,LIBERALS are anti Canadian parties , since military cuts will expose all Canadians to infiltration , jihad , Canadian Islamist state in next few years …………do we really want these guys for our children !!