Since Andrew Coyne wrote this post about the subsidy Horse-Canada receives, and since he carries a title which suggests he holds editorial responsibility at a magazine that receives subsidies orders of magnitude larger than the Horse-Canada subsidy, I do wonder how, in good conscience, he could have failed to address the question of the Maclean’s subsidy squarely.
Since Andrew Coyne wrote this post about the subsidy Horse-Canada receives, and since he carries a title which suggests he holds editorial responsibility at a magazine that receives subsidies orders of magnitude larger than the Horse-Canada subsidy, I do wonder how, in good conscience, he could have failed to address the question of the Maclean’s subsidy squarely.
I’m pretty sure I know Andrew’s position on the matter. But in this context, nobody should have to guess at it.