1

QP Live: All eyes on four by-elections

Join us for your daily dose of political theatre. Tweet about the madness at #QP.


 

Parliamentarians will be forgiven for thinking about events further afield than the House of Commons, as four sets of voters choose new MPs this evening. Whether or not the extraordinarily hyped by-elections produce any surprising results, they’re sure to distract. The topic of discussion in the chamber, though, will no doubt revolve around the continuing puzzle that is the Wright-Duffy affair.

Conservatives are, apparently, unhappy in places. The Prime Minister explained his position on various allegations over the weekend, though his communications director was the one doing the talking. Today, Stephen Harper’s delegated spokesman in the chamber—MP Paul Calandra, the PM’s parliamentary secretary—will undoubtedly speak plenty for the PM. No matter the query from opposition benches, Calandra will continue to argue that his boss was the last guy in his own office to hear about Nigel Wright paying Sen. Mike Duffy’s improperly claimed expenses.

Maclean’s is your home for the daily political theatre that is Question Period, when MPs trade barbs and take names for 45 minutes every day. If you’ve never watched, check out our primer, which we produced with J-Source. Today, QP runs from 2:15 p.m. until just past 3. We tell you who to watch, we stream it live, and we liveblog all the action. The whole thing only matters if you participate. Chime in on Twitter with #QP.

HOT SEAT

Whoever is standing in for the PM will face many pestering questions on the Wright-Duffy affair. That means parliamentary secretary Paul Calandra will be on his feet quite a bit.

HOT TOPICS

THE STREAM

THE BLOG


 

QP Live: All eyes on four by-elections

  1. You can agree with the cons or not, but Mulcairs credibility should be scrutinized more by the MSM. I don’t think Tom should be let off the hook that easy by the MSM for covering up about corruption(corruption is corruption, no matter when it happened). He(tom) should be investigated by the Law society of Quebec for with holding information about crimes taken place in his office when he was a local MHA. If you would do it once, you could do it again. It cuts straight to his credibility.

Sign in to comment.