Introducing the Gillette OctoBlade with built-in WiFi

Seriously though, Scott Feschuk explains why it’s time to shut down the Gillette razor labs

Photo illustration by Sarah MacKinnon

Photo illustration by Sarah MacKinnon

Have you heard the big news? Gillette is promising that its new razor will usher in “an entirely new era in shaving.” Got that? Entirely new. Henceforth, we shall presumably blast away facial stubble with laser cannons or perhaps coax it out using the power of positive thinking. You can do it, Mr. Whisker!

Given the focus of recent advances in shaving technology, you’re probably thinking: more blades. Bet they gave it way more blades. Six blades. Seven. Introducing the Gillette OctoBlade with built-in WiFi and awesome lightning decals along the side!

But no. This time around, Gillette invested five years of R&D and millions of dollars to create, test, hone and perfect—are you ready?—A Handle That Pivots Slightly. (Officially, the company refers to this as FlexBall™ Technology—probably because that sounds more impressive than A Handle That Pivots Slightly™. Which, FYI, is what it is.)

Gillette says its new Fusion ProGlide razor with FlexBall™ Technology is so powerful that it allows capital letters to be placed in the middle of made-up words. It also apparently “responds to facial contours”—unlike my old razor, which, when confronted by anything other than a perfect 90-degree angle, simply exploded into flames.

According to Gillette, for too long now, men have been burdened with the onerous task of having to “twist their faces in awkward ways” when they shave. You ladies out there don’t know what it’s like. One morning back in ’06, I had to lift my chin slightly. And I know a guy who still suffers from PTSD (post-traumatic shaving disorder) on account of having to scrunch up his nose that one time.

Enter the FlexBall™, which is designed to protect men from the countless perils of moderate head tilting. Speaking with reporters, Gillette’s director of Shave Care R&D said, “Yes, that’s my actual job title. Why are you all laughing?” OK, I made up that quote, but what he actually said was: “I think we’ll look back on today and say, ‘This is when shaving changed again.’ ”

Except here’s the thing, Gillette: You’ve already nailed shaving. Your last two razors were both really great. Unless evolution throws us a curveball, and men’s whiskers abruptly become sentient and develop the ability to deploy countermeasures, we’re good for razors. We can shut down Gillette labs and free up the company’s scientists to devote their intellect to more pressing needs, such as a cure for cancer or whatever makes Billy Corgan sing like that.

But frankly, Gillette’s “breakthrough” fits with the current times. U.S. innovation is in a real slump these days.

For instance, Apple’s corporate strategy for the past few years has been to make a bigger and bigger deal out of smaller and smaller advances. We’re, at most, a few months away from CEO Tim Cook presiding over a three-hour announcement of a software update that will make the yellow icons on your iPhone up to 12 per cent “more yellowy.”

And did you see the new sandwich being touted by Burger King? It’s got two all-beef patties, a special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun—so, yeah, it’s a Big Mac. They even call it a Big King, in case you’re too thick to realize it’s a Big Mac. I’m not saying Burger King is going backward with its product development, but we can all look forward to the next new offering on its menu: One Entire Living Cow.

So perhaps it is unsurprising that a company is going to spend $200 million to market a razor that, by its own best estimation, shaves facial hair one-fortieth of one millimetre shorter than before. (Now I can wait an extra six seconds before I shave again. Thanks!)

Sure, some have been hard on the FlexBall™, calling it “a glorified marketing gimmick” and “a dumb novelty.” And sure, I bought one, shaved with it and immediately thought to myself: “Wait, did I just use my old razor by mistake, because this feels exactly like my old razor? Nope, new razor.”

But, on the other hand, the new CEO of Procter & Gamble—which owns the Gillette brand—recently said he sees an opportunity to squeeze more revenue out of the high end of the market for the products that people use every day.

So there is some profoundly American innovation behind this new product after all. The innovation is charging more.




Browse

Introducing the Gillette OctoBlade with built-in WiFi

  1. There was an article on the Onion a while back called ‘@$%! it, we’re going 5 blades’. It was a hilarious satire, written from the perspective of the CEO of Gillette about how they needed to reclaim their spot as innovators of razor technology in the face of upstarts matching them on three blade technology. Today, my Gillette razor has 5 blades on it.

    Even further back, there was a Saturday Night live sketch in apparent response to the emergence of the two blade razor which capitalized on the hilarity of a 3 blade razor.

    If the trend holds, the WiFi enabled Octoblade with flex grip won’t be far off. I suggest you run to the patent office now.

  2. Oh brother. I decided a while back that this multi-blade thing was getting entirely too crazy. I went back to the type of razor my dad used, along with blades where the high end seems to be about $5 for 20 blades. Guess what – it’s a much better shave, and I don’t have to pay upwards of $7 per blade. So… take that, Gilette.

    • Peg’s got it. I bought a Merkur Furtur many years ago, and with feather or derby blades, it gives me as good a shave, but for a fraction of the cost. And the fraction is not 1/4, or 1/10. It’s 1/100 or 1/1000th.

  3. Gillette has been going backwards since the Sensor and Sensor Excel, the two best mass market safety razors ever invented. As soon as they came out with the Mach 3 they jumped the shark. The fact is, multiple blades do not give you a better shave.. They just give you a more expensive shave, with more irritation. But not to worry, Gillette has products to sell you to soothe razor burn too. All you need to do is spend even more money on Gillette products.

  4. The authors and commenters here clearly understand the tragedy here – major R&D funding & marketing money squandered on … what … a line extension to a line extension? “opportunity to squeeze more revenue out of the high end of the market” really?

    Harvard professor and author Clay Christensen has been embroiled in a debate over the past week on this exact subject – the nature of innovation – he summed his perspective on this nicely last Thursday: sustaining innovations do not create growth. Seems to me that leaders who do not appreciate the depth of this (impact on their organizations, staff, communities and economy) should get it tatooed on the back on their writing hand.

    If you are interested in more check out Christensen’s new book “The Capitalist’s Dilemma”. For more on the debate I am tracking links here http://bit.ly/1jJI4kq

Sign in to comment.