Patents expire and the single-serve coffee war heats up

Single-serve coffee wars heat up

As patents expire, companies are desperate to reclaim their monopoly on your pricey morning brew

Dina Rudick/Boston Globe/Getty Images

Dina Rudick/Boston Globe/Getty Images

The perfect, North American-sized cup of homemade coffee. That’s what Nespresso is promising Canadians with its new $299 VertuoLine coffee-making system. Jacques Demont, the head of Nespresso Canada, says the fast-growing arm of Swiss food giant Nestlé spent no less than eight years perfecting the technology, claiming there’s far more to it than pushing more coffee and hot water through the company’s existing single-serve espresso-makers.

But critics say the “intelligent extraction” technology, in which each coffee pod has a bar code, is in fact a clever, or ruthless, way to protect what’s been a stranglehold on the booming market for single-serve coffee pods, which were protected by patents. Until recently, owners of single-serve machines were forced to buy their coffee from Nespresso or, in the case of rival Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, maker of the popular Keurig machines, from one of its dozens of licensed suppliers. But those patents have been expiring, and now a battle is under way to win back their dominance.

For instance, Green Mountain is rolling out radio-frequency identification technology for its K-Cups that will effectively prevent its newest machines from brewing unlicensed packs. “No monopoly likes to lose their monopoly power,” says Gene Kakaulin, the CEO and co-founder of New York-based HiLine Coffee Co., which began selling Nespresso-compatible pods last July. “If I was in their position, I would probably do the same thing.”

The dawn of a new round in the pod wars demonstrates just how valuable the single-serve business has become. U.S. sales of pods tripled to $3.1 billion between 2011 and 2013, according to data from Mintel Group. In Canada, market research firm NPD Group says nearly half of all coffee makers sold are of the single-serve variety, while Demont says coffee-pods here are now a $725-million-a-year business.

For years, Nespresso, Green Mountain and others like Kraft’s Tassimo had the market to themselves. They tapped appliance-makers to build and sell the machines, secure in the knowledge they’d make far more money selling their proprietary pods to a captive audience over the life of the appliance—a business model often compared to printer cartridges and razor blades. Despite mind-boggling mark-ups—as much as double or triple the price of a bag of roasted beans from Starbucks or the local supermarket—consumers gravitated to the format. It promised more convenience, improved consistency and fewer half-pots of stale brew poured down the sink.

But cracks began to appear when Green Mountain’s patent on its K-Cups expired in 2012, opening up its machines to unlicensed coffee suppliers. The same thing has now happened to Nespresso, which has lost several court battles aimed at preventing cheaper, third-party pods, like those made by HiLine, from finding their way into its machines. (Kakaulin says he got the idea after running out of Nespresso pods one day, forcing him to fashion his own out of a spent capsule and a piece of tin foil.) In general, Kakaulin says, the courts have viewed single-serve coffee makers the same way they view regular drip ones, meaning consumers should be entitled to fill it with whatever they want.

With the barbarians at the gate, both Nespresso and Green Mountain are scrambling to introduce new technologies to their platforms that will be eligible for patent protection. Green Mountain CEO Brian Kelley confirmed on a recent conference call the company’s upcoming Keurig 2.0 brewing system will not accept unlicensed pods because of new “interactive technology to help us perfectly brew all Keurig brew packs.” Green Mountain has argued such technology is necessary because future Keurig machines will brew both larger amounts of coffee (including, oddly enough, a full-sized pot—just like a regular drip coffee maker that can be purchased for as little as $20 at Wal-Mart) and a slew of non-coffee beverages. A new cold brew system, for example, will pump out flavoured waters, energy drinks and pop. The ploy has drawn the interest of Coca-Cola, which recently purchased a 10 per cent stake in Green Mountain for US$1.3 billion. Keurig has also inked a partnership with Campbell’s to develop K-Cup packs that will make soup.

While Demont claims Nespresso’s new VertuoLine system will have “patent protection until 2030,” he notes the machine will only be sold in North America and that the company is banking on its strong brand and reputation for customer service (Nespresso capsules are sold only in swanky boutiques or through an online “club”) to keep customers in the fold. There are no plans to start brewing non-coffee beverages, he said.

Kakaulin, for one, doubts either company’s gambit will work as planned. The former private-equity associate predicts the industry will ultimately go the way of the tech world, where the most successful firms are usually the ones that embrace third-party developers. “In time,” he says, “open systems tend to win over.”

Filed under:

Single-serve coffee wars heat up

  1. Yet another reason to never use these expensive, wasteful products. Ordinary coffee grounds can be composted/green-binned, but these plastic capsules, topped w/ foil – not so much.

    • You can remove the foil and compost the grounds plus recycle the plastic container and foil. Also, Kuerig has a re-usable cup so you can just use regular grounds to make your cuppa. I like my machine. You get instant hot water for tea, hot chocolate plus an instant cup of brewed coffee. It is great for the workplace. BUT to each their own…

      • A number of municipalities have contradicted this and asked the consumers dispose of coffee pods in the trash. Perhaps this will change, but given that separating a pod into three streams (plastic, foil and compost) requires effort, compliance is likely to be low.


          Well…I live in Alberta….Edmonton and Calgary can recycle the plastic from the Keuring cups. According to this website, many places in Canada are doing so. Edmonton is very progressive when it comes to recycling and composting….they have curbside composting of everything including meat and dog feces. As for separating the components of the pod, where I live we do our own compost and the curbside company separates the plastic from the foil after the pickup the clean items. It isn’t any more inconvenient than recycling single-serving yogurt containers.

    • Spread in around flowers and raspberry/strawberry bushes it keeps certain pests away without the poisons. You will never see squirrels standing on coffee grounds ruining a strawberry.

  2. People with too much mney and no regard to debt buy these machines.

    BTW, Walmart price is exactly $21.49, as there is GST, PST extra for most Canadains. Think is, I bought one of these after an expensive machine failed. Glad I did as the cheapo has already outlasted the now discarded expensive machine.

    ANd we buy coffee at Costco, $10 a tin. If they get greedy, we buy bagged beans bulk and put a $12 US grinder to work. Its unbelievable people pay this much for coffee machines or $5 twice a day at TIms.

    $5 twice as day is a $650,000 TFSA at 6%/yr returns in 30-40 years. And people wonder why they are broke? Its because they are economically stupid. You squandered an upscale debt free home for over priced coffee!

    But most Canadians are about “status”, shallow bragging that they have a bigger, better, more expensive coffee machine or can blow $50/week at Tims. The craziness. So narcissistic on self importance that they have to have it, they discard basic economics and charge it in revolving debt which even makes it worse.

    There is a reason they call it a “loonie”.

  3. Pingback: Global Ports Forum » Blog Archive » Patents expire and the single-serve coffee war heats up