1

Question and Astronaut: Jeremy Hansen

Jeremy Hansen on parenting from space and why Mars is a ‘crappy planet’, part of our series in conversation with Canadian astronauts


 
(Richard Lautens/Toronto Star/Getty Images)

(Richard Lautens/Toronto Star/Getty Images)

MAC33_SPACE_INTERVIEW_HANSEN_FEATURE01Jeremy Hansen

Space mission:

  • First mission: by 2020

Read other entries from Question and Astronaut, our series of annotated interviews with Canadian astronauts who have been or will soon go to space.

Q: What was the most difficult part of your training?

A: The hardest part was definitely our time in Halifax, when we went through the Canadian military’s Navy battle-damage simulation. They gave us one day of training on how to fight fires and plug holes on a sinking ship in this amazing simulator they have in a building, where they can set a compartment on fire, and they can flood a compartment with freezing water. Then, on the second day, we went through it in small groups, and we spent the whole day fighting fires and plugging holes. It was really hard. I’ve had some pretty big challenges in the military, some big, physical days, and this was on par with some of the toughest days. It was telling, I think. What they’re looking for is how you react when things aren’t going your way, when you’re no longer feeling great, you’re exhausted, you’re approaching hypothermia—how do you treat others? Are you able to contribute to the team?

Q: How long have you wanted to be an astronaut?

A: For me, that passion was ignited at an early age. I have this recollection of looking at a picture of the Apollo program—Neil Armstrong standing on the Moon—then looking at the night sky and realizing that, right where I was looking, people stood and looked back at the Earth. Even as a fairly young child, that was not lost on me, and it inspired me to pursue my dream. I didn’t know if I would ever become an astronaut, of course, and the odds are not in your favour, but I just kept it in the back of my mind and tried to keep those options open.

Q: What are you most looking forward to when you finally go into space?

A: When you talk to astronauts, the most profound thing is the view—looking back at the planet—so I absolutely know for sure that that’s going to change my perspective on our planet, and it’s going to change my perspective on life, I think.

Q: What are you most nervous about?

hansen1A: Mission-wise, there’s nothing I’d be nervous about this far out, but I do wonder about the challenges of parenting from space.Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 2.39.35 PM It’s tough to parent from the ground, so when I do fly in space—I have three children, they’re 10, eight and eight; I have twins—you just never know what life’s going to throw at you. Let’s say I’m gone for six months, which is what we’ve planned right now. That’s a long time to contribute as a parent from space.

Q: Tell me about what you do when you’re an astronaut who’s not getting ready for a mission. What’s your day-to-day work like right now?

A: Actually, that’s one of the things I like most about my job: There isn’t much of a day-to-day. For example, last week, I was flying with the RCAF, flying CF-18s. Today, I was going through my annual physical. I take language classes, I learn robotics and spacewalking, so every week is different.

Q: You have a military background. Did anything from that help you get through this process?

A: Two things—what I would call the operational skill sets. I share them with young Canadians when they ask me, “What do I need to work on?” For me, I got them from learning to fly gliders and airplanes with the Air Cadet program, and then from joining the military. The outcome of my decisions affect whether I live or die, or whether someone else lives or dies, or gets injured. Having serious consequences to your decision-making process is something you have to be very comfortable with. It’s something you learn and you practise over time, so I encourage people to find some way to challenge themselves. The other thing I share with people, which I’ve learned over time, is self-confidence. You have to get very comfortable with saying, “Well, every day, I’m just going to give my best. I have skill sets I’ve learned, I’m going to employ them, and my best is going to be good enough.” I don’t spend a lot of time fretting about what’s coming; I make the assumption that I’m going to deal with it properly and have a good outcome.

Q: What’s catching your interest in the space world?

A: I really love sharing with young Canadians the changes we’re seeing in the space program right now with what we call “commercial space.” We have commercial cargo delivery to the space station, and now we have what we call “commercial crew,” where we’re going to be delivering people to low orbit on new vehicles that are being designed by Boeing and SpaceX.Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 2.39.35 PM

hansen2When I look at all the other pieces I see coming together in the space programs, I realize that the 2020s are going to be completely different than this decade has been. There’s going to be rapid progress. One of the most important aspects is going to be cheaper access to space. It changes everything. We have the ideas and the technology to do a lot of things, but we’re limited financially, so, by reducing the cost of access to space, the whole problem is changed. Ultimately, the pieces that are coming together are going to allow us to send humans to Mars—and bring them back.

Q: What do you think of the people buying one-way tickets for Mars One?

A: I don’t think they’re crazy to want to go. I think there are people in different phases of their lives, and I think there are people who’d be happy to go and do that. I have a wife and three children and, for me, there has to be a return. I can’t just check out of all these things that I’ve committed to here on Earth.
I think my career will end too early for me to go to Mars, though I might be involved in preparing the next generation to go. I’d love to explore Mars, but, ultimately, it’s kind of a crappy planet. The thing is, [Mars One people would] never go outside without a spacesuit ever again. You’re going to live in a tin can. Space stations are noisy; it’s like living inside a computer with the fan on all the time. You’re never going to smell grass or trees. It’s just never going to be anything like Earth. You’re never going to swim. You’re giving up so much.

Q: What would you tell aspiring astronauts?

A: I’d like to reiterate that the opportunities in space are going to be vastly different than they’ve been before, so, for young Canadians preparing for their futures, it’s important to understand that there are going to be many opportunities to work in either new space industries that are being developed or to actually go to space, to be one of the people to join our team of explorers who are going to leave lower-Earth orbit. That, ultimately, is amazing, the opportunities we’ll have.

Get to know the great unknowable. Read Maclean’s special Space issue, on physical newsstands this week and on Next Issue, Apple Newsstand and Google Play.

Update


 

Question and Astronaut: Jeremy Hansen

  1. ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH

    by Babu G. Ranganathan
    (B.A. Bible/Biology)

    In the Earth’s past there was powerful volcanic activity which could have easily spewed dirt and rocks containing microbes into outer space which not only could have eventually reached Mars but also ended up traveling in orbit through space that we now know as meteors, comets, and asteroids. A Newsweek article of September 21, 1998, p.12 mentions the high possibility of Earth life on Mars. “We think there’s about 7 million tons of earth soil sitting on Mars”, says scientist and evolutionist Kenneth Nealson. “You have to consider the possibility that if we find life on Mars, it could have come from the Earth” [Weingarten, T., Newsweek, September 21, 1998, p.12].

    HAVING THE RIGHT CONDITIONS AND RAW MATERIALS FOR LIFE doesn’t mean that life can originate by chance. Proteins can’t come into existence unless there’s life first! Miller, in his famous experiment in 1953, showed that individual amino acids (the building blocks of life) could come into existence by chance. But, it’s not enough just to have amino acids. The various amino acids that make-up life must link together in a precise sequence, just like the letters in a sentence, to form functioning protein molecules. If they’re not in the right sequence the protein molecules won’t work. It has never been shown that various amino acids can bind together into a sequence by chance to form protein molecules. Even the simplest cell is made up of many millions of various protein molecules.

    The probability of just an average size protein molecule arising by chance is 10 to the 65th power. Mathematicians have said any event in the universe with odds of 10 to 50th power or greater is impossible! The late great British scientist Sir Frederick Hoyle calculated that the odds of even the simplest cell coming into existence by chance is 10 to the 40,000th power! How large is this? Consider that the total number of atoms in our universe is 10 to the 82nd power.

    Also, what many don’t realize is that Miller had a laboratory apparatus that shielded and protected the individual amino acids the moment they were formed, otherwise the amino acids would have quickly disintegrated and been destroyed in the mix of random energy and forces involved in Miller’s experiment.

    Miller’s experiment produced equally both left-handed and right-handed amino acids, but all living things strictly require only left-handed amino acids. If a right-handed amino acid gets into the chain the protein won’t work.

    There is no innate chemical tendency for the various amino acids to bond with one another in a sequence. Any one amino acid can just as easily bond with any other. The only reason at all for why the various amino acids bond with one another in a precise sequence in the cells of our bodies is because they’re directed to do so by an already existing sequence of molecules found in our genetic code.

    Of course, once you have a complete and living cell then the genetic code and biological machinery exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how could life or the cell have naturally originated when no directing code and mechanisms existed in nature? Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.

    A partially evolved cell would quickly disintegrate under the effects of random forces of the environment, especially without the protection of a complete and fully functioning cell membrane. A partially evolved cell cannot wait millions of years for chance to make it complete and living! In fact, it couldn’t have even reached the partially evolved state.

    Please read my popular Internet articles listed below:

    ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH, SCIENCE AND THE ORIGIN OF LIFE, NATURAL LIMITS OF EVOLUTION, HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS (2nd Edition), NO HALF-EVOLVED DINOSAURS, HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?DOES GOD PARTICLE EXPLAIN UNIVERSE’S ORIGIN?

    Visit my newest Internet site: THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION

    Sincerely,

    Babu G. Ranganathan*

    (B.A. theology/biology)

    Author of popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS

    * I have had the privilege of being recognized in the 24th edition of Marquis “Who’s Who In The East” for my writings on religion and science, and I have given successful lectures (with question and answer time afterwards) defending creation from science before evolutionist science faculty and students at various colleges and universities.

Sign in to comment.