2

Welcome to the Internet. No kids allowed

Where’s the wisdom in forcing kids to lie about their age to get online?


 

If you’re under 13, you’re not allowed on Facebook.

That’s not the command of a strict parent—it’s Facebook policy. It also happens to be U.S. law. Thanks to the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, it’s illegal for websites to collect the personal data of anyone under 13 without parental consent. Mark Zuckerberg has vowed to fight this law, but for now, Facebook won’t let you sign up unless you state your age as 13 or over, regardless of which country you live in.

Of course, Facebook is just one of the sites kids aren’t supposed to use. Just about every commercial website has small print in their TOU (Terms of Use) limiting access to those legally able to enter into binding contracts. In Canada, as in most countries, this means ages 18 and up. So if you’re a teenager who follows the rules, you can’t tweet, you can’t watch a YouTube video, and you can’t even run a Google search.

Of course, all kids, except maybe the Amish, break these rules. Their parents and teachers help them to break these rules. My 8-month old baby has broken these rules. According to Consumer Reports, 7.5 million kids have lied about their age to Facebook. And the number seems low;  according to a Pew Center Survey, 73 percent of kids use social networks.

If you’re a kid, lying about your age to websites is easy and routine. So is ignoring long, restrictive, and painfully written TOUs. But where does that leave kids as online citizens? It makes them into phantom entities, without responsibilities or rights. Websites can (and have) deleted their accounts—their videos, their emails, on a whim, leaving minors without recourse.

It’s frightening to think that five years after joining Facebook, millions of minors will be falsely presenting themselves to the world as adults. With all the hysteria around online child predators, you’d think that forcing 15 year old kids to tell the world that they are eighteen would be considered a pretty bad idea.

Making lying a prerequisite to participating in online life lends false credibility to the false idea that what happens on the Internet doesn’t matter.  It’s a pretty shabby introduction to digital life. Lawmakers and websites need to work together on a better deal for kids.


 

Welcome to the Internet. No kids allowed

  1. Who’s kidding who – the disclaimers are a means of covering their butts legally. It is unenforceable. Any ideas for a workable solution that protects both minors and the owners?

  2. Most adults with whom I have had a discussion about these issues seem to be unable to get past the misconception that if the name attatched to some online post sounds like a real name, that it must be real, and so they claim to assign greater authority to such posts than they do to posters who sign themselves, most realistically, as anonymous.

    Even industry players cannot see the difficulty inherant in the fact that we have no way of knowing when any media we consume has come freely from its rightful copyright owner, or was posted by a pirate.  Or for that matter when a settlement notice for copyright ingringement has come from an authorised legal representative, or from a fraudster.

    And nobody seems to have noticed that by installing copyright ‘agents’ inside the offices of youtube and facebook, to expedite the rights of big media conglomerates alone, that we have effectively shut out unpopular dialogue, chilled political dissidence, and derailed the great promise that the Internet once held for democracy. I’m not holding my breath and waiting for lawmakers and websites to lead us out of this.

    Eventually these teens will take over and show us the way.  Somehow, I don’t think it will look anything like what the media and the government has planned.

Sign in to comment.