The problem with cats

Outdoor feline populations are exploding across the country and cities are struggling to keep the cats—and cat lovers—at bay


 
Cats on a corrugated roof. (mer Fuat Eryener/EyeEm/Getty Images

Cats on a corrugated roof. (mer Fuat Eryener/EyeEm/Getty Images

“Most cats don’t want to be spotted, so it can be really difficult to count them,” observes Tyler Flockhart. “But there are exceptions.”

The exception this wintry afternoon in Guelph, Ont., is an inquisitive jet-black cat with just the slightest dab of white at the end of its tail. Wandering over from a nearby balcony, Blackie (or perhaps it’s Tip?) proceeds to rub itself against Flockhart’s leg. As he’s being greeted, Flockhart scribbles down the details of their encounter: time of day, colouring, health and location. Demeanour? Unconcerned. Another cat counted.

As with herding cats, tallying them with any sense of precision seems an entirely Sisyphean task. But Flockhart, who holds a post-doctoral position at the University of Guelph’s Department of Integrative Biology, aims to bring some scientific rigour to the controversial topic of outdoor cats. His brief interaction with Blackie is part of a research agenda aimed at putting a reliable number on Guelph’s outdoor felines—a broad category that includes pet cats with outdoor privileges, lost or abandoned strays and entirely feral cats. By repeatedly walking pre-determined routes, recording every cat sighted and applying statistical methods typically used to count animals in less-developed surroundings, he hopes to produce a figure that’s more than just a wild guess. “If you want to understand or manage the cat population, you first need to know how many cats are out there, where they are and what determines their abundance,” he says.

Research to date suggests that for every cat Flockhart spots on Guelph’s streets, another 20 are hiding somewhere nearby. Roaming cats appear with greater frequency in lower-income residential neighbourhoods, suggesting a socio-economic aspect to the problem. And they are less common near major roads and woods, where cars and coyotes, respectively—two major threats to feline longevity—lurk. By Flockhart’s reckoning, Guelph, with a population of 120,000 humans, is home to between 8,000 and 10,000 cats at large. Is that a lot? It probably depends on what you think about cats. And lately, Canadian cities have been thinking a lot about cats.

Across Canada, municipalities both large and small are replacing their old animal control bylaws with “responsible pet ownership” rules. This move is intended to shift the obligations of pet behaviour away from animals to their owners. A common feature of the accelerating trend is a requirement that owners get a licence for their cats and ensure they don’t roam. (Exact rules vary from city to city.) Once considered so absurd it featured in a Monty Python skit, the cat licence is now becoming, like the task of picking up your dog’s poop, yet another prosaic obligation of modern pet ownership.

Over the past several months, Montreal, Peterborough, Ont., Sudbury, Ont., and Guelph have all mandated licences for resident cats. Winnipeg made the move a year ago, joining early adopters Regina, Saskatoon, Edmonton, Ottawa and Toronto.

Calgary is considered to be the pioneer of this movement, with a bylaw that took effect in 2007. “We are certainly seeing a trend toward a greater focus on cats,” says Barbara Cartwright, CEO of the Canadian Federation of Humane Societies (CFHS), a group that lobbies for cat licensing. “We’ve had bylaws covering dogs for a very long time, but only in the past decade have we started to see similar concern for cats.”

In 2012, the CFHS estimated Canada’s owned cat population at 10.2 million—substantially outnumbering dogs as the country’s most popular pet. Yet numerical superiority doesn’t necessarily mean a better lifestyle. “We treat dogs differently than we do cats,” laments Cartwright. Perhaps because dogs tend to insert themselves deeply into the emotional life of their families, they benefit from more attention, such as vet care, as well as stricter official scrutiny. Cats play it cooler, and are more likely to walk on the wild side.

In her 2016 book The Lion in the Living Room, Abigail Tucker notes the peculiarity that the house cat, despite thousands of years of human domestication, is still nearly identical to its untamed relatives. While dogs have been bred into a dizzying array of shapes and sizes to satisfy the whims of their owners, “cats have changed so little physically during their time among people that even today experts often can’t tell house tabbies from wild cats,” writes Tucker.

This latent wildness likely explains the laissez-faire attitude of many cat owners; an estimated 40 per cent let their kitties roam outside to indulge in ancient hunting rituals. This aura of self-sufficiency is also the reason why a depressing number of cats are abandoned whenever they become inconvenient. “If you see a dog at large in your neighbourhood, chances are you’ll do something about it,” observes Cartwright. “But if you see a cat wandering around, you’ll probably think, ‘So what. It’s just a cat.’ ”

One way to confront this disparity is to make people pay for the privilege of owning one. “Licensing is a tool to change perceptions,” says Cartwright.

Prior to Calgary’s 2007 cat licensing bylaw, almost 40 per cent of stray cats trapped in the city were euthanized. Without a centralized ID system, it was difficult to match lost cats with their owners. Today, Tara Lowes, superintendent of shelter operations at the city’s Animal Services Centre, happily reports that more than half of all impounded cats are returned to their owners and just 10 per cent are put down out of necessity. “Now responsible owners can come in and pick up their pets. It’s made a big difference,” she says. But while cat licensing may move cats up the value chain and help reunite lost pets with their owners, the policy is incapable of resolving Canada’s other major cat issue: what to do about the vast clowder of unowned, outdoor cats.

The Humane Society’s 10.2 million figure refers only to owned pet cats. They’re waiting on Flockhart’s research to bring greater clarity to the issue of outdoor and feral cats. Regardless of exact numbers, however, many cities complain they’re overrun. “The reproductive cycle of an outdoor cat is completely unmanageable,” says Lubna Ekramoddoullah, a director of the Surrey Community Cat Coalition in B.C.; an unspayed cat can have a litter every two to three months. In 2014, her group estimated the unowned feral cat population in Surrey at a whopping 34,000. After consulting with Flockhart, she now considers that number to be unreliable, but stresses “the crisis is still ongoing.”

Ekramoddoullah figures two-thirds of the cats living on Surrey’s streets are abandoned house cats, mostly from low-income neighbourhoods where owners are less likely to sterilize their pets. While Surrey doesn’t have a cat-licensing bylaw, this makes little difference: no one licenses unowned cats.

Efforts in Surrey to stem the feline tidal wave follow “trap, neuter and return,” or TNR, as practised in most Canadian cities by volunteer organizations, or with official oversight. Under TNR, outdoor cats are trapped whenever possible. Owned cats are returned to their homes if possible. Unowned cats with suitable temperaments are put up for adoption. The rest are spayed or neutered and returned to the alleys or backyards where they were found.

Volunteers often visit daily to provide food to these free-range cat colonies, but otherwise the off-grid cats are left alone to prowl the urban jungle. “Once they are fixed and have reliable food and shelter, most cats don’t wander too far,” says Debbie Nelson, a founder of Calgary’s MEOW Foundation, which has been practising TNR since before the city’s cat licensing bylaw. “Cats aren’t stupid. There are lots of kind souls out there to feed them, so they stick around.”

There is, however, considerable doubt about whether TNR can be considered a permanent solution to free-roaming cats. In theory, it should lead to a gradual diminution in colony size as the breeding pool shrinks. But real-world evidence is mixed. For TNR to be successful, up to 90 per cent of a colony’s cats must be fixed, and new cats somehow prevented from arriving. It’s a big ask. “No municipal-scale TNR program has been shown scientifically to reduce the number of free-roaming unowned cats in a jurisdiction,” says Travis Longcore, author of a lengthy review of TNR’s efficacy in the academic journal Conservation Biology. Rather than solving cat overpopulation, he sees it serving a different purpose. “The goal of TNR is to coddle people who have the hobby of feeding feral cats,” he snaps.

Nelson disagrees, pointing to a steady decrease in the number of TNR procedures her organization has performed over the years as evidence it can work. “I believe with continued effort we can reduce and eliminate the roaming cat population,” she says. “And even if the goal is just to reduce euthanasia, I think TNR is still worthy. Why would we want to kill any animal?”

If TNR is simply meant to spare the lives of outdoor cats—perhaps a reasonable objective given the role human inattention plays in their current proliferation—its continued application sets up an unusual dichotomy, given the current trend toward cat licensing and responsible pet ownership bylaws. Montreal’s new bylaw, for example, requires owned cats to wear a licence at all times, even if they never go outside. They are also forbidden from “wandering,” and it is illegal for anyone to feed a stray animal. Yet the city’s new pet ordinance explicitly exempts unowned TNR cats and their “guardians” from all such rules. For a movement that’s supposed to equalize the treatment of dogs and cats, it seems a striking disparity. Consider the civic mayhem that would ensue if a pack of feral dogs suddenly took up residence in a park and a group of volunteers dropped off a few raw steaks every night for their benefit. No one would tolerate such a situation. “There is a contradiction here,” admits Calgary’s Lowes about the differing ways in which owned and feral cats are treated under her city’s bylaw. “But to be honest, we don’t hear a lot about cat colonies from our citizens.”

Local cat coalitions and humane societies tend to dominate municipal discussions about outdoor cats, so advocacy for TNR and the need to avoid euthanasia generally take precedence over policy coherence. As a result, other issues get far less airing. Feral cats, for example, have been implicated in some worrisome public health issues, such as the recent outbreak of raccoon-borne rabies in southern Ontario. And they’re murder on birds. “The ongoing mortality of birds by domestic and feral cats in Canada is a disgrace and needs to be addressed urgently,” complains Alan Burger, an ornithologist at the University of Victoria and president of BC Nature. Neutered or not, outdoor cats remain skilled and prolific hunters—a federal government report estimated the annual toll of birds killed by cats at nearly 200 million, with the majority killed by ferals.

Burger’s group promotes province-wide cat licensing as a first step to keeping all cats locked up. And he considers TNR “a waste of time because you are putting a predator back out there to kill more birds. If you’ve captured a cat, it should be put down,” he says.

On the topic of outdoor cats, cat lovers and bird lovers tend to fight like, well, cats and dogs. “Quite often the conversation comes down to either killing cats or not killing cats. And that isn’t very productive,” says Flockhart.

Is there hope for middle ground? Some of Flockhart’s colleagues at the University of Guelph have tried to turn their city into a test case for cat-bird détente by focusing on mutual objectives and interests. The first lesson: don’t refer to the problem as “cat overpopulation”; that gets cat people worked up. Hence the Cat Population Taskforce. And while both sides tend to approve of cat licensing (for different reasons), there’s no agreement on how to control their unlicensed relatives.

Failing interspecies rapprochement, Flockhart puts his hope in better science. Knowing how many cats are actually wandering our streets, where they’re located and why, may eventually make it possible to come to some broader conclusions about what to do with them. He finds evidence that cats avoid woods where coyotes are known to prowl to be “very, very interesting.” This suggests birds find safety in the presence of coyotes, a predator that suffers from a reputation even worse than that of feral cats.

It also hints at an ecosystem with its own checks and balances operating outside the realm of human involvement. “The number of cats isn’t just a product of the number of people,” says Flockhart. “There is also a natural process at work here. And from an ecological perspective, mortality is a natural process.”

If humans can’t figure out how to solve their cat problem, maybe Mother Nature will have to get involved.


 

The problem with cats

  1. Cats should be kept indoors……or not at all.

    • Feral cats aren’t owned so how do you propose keeping them indoors?
      Many people abandon their cats that aren’t fixed, how do you propose we stop that?

  2. People lose their minds over cats. I was asked to go to a benefit to feed and neuter feral cats, I declined, “Why not let the coyotes deal with the cats?” I asked, my query was not well received.

    • Not a lot of coyotes in cities, dude.

      • Maybe there aren’t many coyotes in city centres, but in surrounding areas there can be sufficient habitat in undeveloped or semi-developed land to support numerous coyotes. When I used to live Burnaby, BC, which is right next to Vancouver, coyotes sightings were pretty common. Residence students at Simon Fraser University’s Burnaby Mountain campus would occasionally receive warnings about black bear sightings.

        • And what is your plan for dealing with coyotes? Or, are coyotes acceptable because, hey, they look a bit like dogs?

          Should coyotes now be viewed as prey animals, and if so, what is the predator? Tough guys with rifles?

          • ★★★…
            +++++++++++++rrree>>>
            Most of us want to have good income but dont know how to do that on Internet there are a lot of methods to earn huge sum, but whenever Buddies try that they get trapped in a scam/fraud so I thought to share with you a genuine and guaranteed method for free to earn huge sum of money at home anyone of you interested should visit the page. I am more than sure that you will get best result.
            Best Of Luck for new Initiative!

            █▓▒░F░O░L░L░O░W░░M░E░▒▓██••►!!! http://paypro8.com

            ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔

            ❥———————————————————-━━━❥

  3. I find it extremely interesting that our society has little trouble culling wolves and coyotes and any other animal that historically scares us through myths and legends but can not bring itself to cull cats even though they are so harmful to the environment and are an introduced species whose populations are exploding.

    I guess public policy is based a lot on fear instead of facts.

    • I wasn’t aware that coyotes and wolves were regularly kept as family pets.

    • Your latest phenomenally childish and manipulative con is claiming that the number of feral-cat intakes into shelters in some-way represents the fewer numbers that are roaming free, still destroying everyone’s property, still harassing the pets of responsible pet-owners, still spreading 3dozen+ deadly diseases to people’s pets and humans and wildlife, and still torturing billions of native wildlife (thousands of individual native-species) to death for your vermin cats’ play-toys.

      Claiming that there are fewer destructive invasive-species cats roaming free by comparing them to the number of shelter intakes is just as phenomenally stupid, manipulative, and ignorant as claiming there would be fewer rusting cars on the sides of all the roads, leaking all their toxic fluids and heavy-metals into the environment, just because people no-longer took them to the local junkyard for responsible and ecologically-safe disposal.

      I guess some fools are just that phenomenally stupid and easily manipulated by you criminally irresponsible cat-lunatics. Even someone with a 3rd-grade background in arithmetic could see beyond this inane and blatantly manipulative tactic of yours. Did any of you even graduate from 3rd-grade?

      Any parents of children reading this? Here’s how you can tell that your child’s room is now cleaner than ever before: Fewer of their dirty clothes are in the dirty-clothes hamper where they belong and there is less trash in the garbage-cans. That’s a good way to tell, isn’t it. According to these insane, ignorant, and perpetually-manipulative and deceptive cat-hoarders that’s PRECISELY how you can tell that there is less of a problem in regards to their invasive-species, disease-infested, vermin, garbage-cats. And they are just so stupid that they think everyone else can’t see right through this childishly deceptive song & dance-act of theirs. I swear; we’re dealing with whiney, manipulative, and irresponsible snot-nosed 7-year-olds who are making-up outlandish excuses to not clean-up their rooms properly.

  4. Here is glaring proof of how, as cat-hoarders so often and mindlessly respew, “Trap-Neuter-Release is the most effective means of managing feral cat populations. In fact, it is the only proven way to do so.”

    The residents of the UK who invented TNR in the 1950’s have been relentlessly practicing that failed ideology nationwide for over 60 years now. And all they have managed to do with TNR is DOUBLE their vermin cat populations — from 4.1 million vermin cats in 1965 to 8.1 million vermin cats in 2015. (One site claims 10.5 million today!) And to help, all this time they are still killing them in shelters and legally shooting them in rural areas under their animal depredation-control laws. By foolishly hoping and praying that their very own TNR concept will reduce vermin cat populations someday they have now even driven their one and only NATIVE cat species to extinction with their invasive-species vermin “moggies” (feral house-cats) — with less than 19 “Scottish Wildcats” left in the whole world. (Along with 421 other species that they have already made extinct in the UK in the last 200 years — OVER TWO SPECIES PER YEAR GONE FOREVER just due to British cultural beliefs, practices, and values.) All the while they still insist that practicing their failed TNR policies will still save their “Scottish Wildcat” from being wiped from the earth forever. You can kiss their “Scottish Wildcat” good-bye too now because 19 individuals is not even enough RNA diversity for a viable/successful species anymore — they are already EXTINCT. (Laughably ironic if it weren’t so pathetically, globally, and permanently sad. The population of the UK have made themselves into the ecological-laughingstocks of the whole world.)

    Nice plan. TNR sure does work, doesn’t it!

    You know that saying about doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. The British have proved the failure of their vermin cat-insanity for over 60 years now. You too can be just as ecologically destructive, ignorant, and just as insane as the inbred mentalities of the Toxoplasma gondii brain-damaged moggie-licking British by practicing and promoting their failed-belief in their TNR concept.

    Here too are some wonderful quotes from an article published by their most revered TNR promoters — the very “scientists” that TNR imbeciles always quote out of context to try to support their TNR insanity. Read it and weep.

    “Virtually no information exists to support the contention that neutering is an effective long-term method for controlling free-roaming cat populations.”

    “Free-roaming cats do not appear to have sufficient territorial activity to prevent new arrivals from permanently joining colonies.”

    Levy, Julie K., David W. Gale, and Leslie A. Gale. “Evaluation of the Effect of a Long-Term Trap-Neuter-Return and Adoption Program on a Free-Roaming Cat Population.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2003, 222(1)

    Or these comments from Julie K. Levy’s other study::

    “In both counties, results of analyses did not indicate a consistent reduction in per capita growth, the population multiplier, or the proportion of female cats that were pregnant.”

    “Implementation of the stage-structured model suggested that no plausible combinations of life history variables would likely allow for TNR to succeed in reducing population size, although neutering approximately 75% of the cats could achieve control (which is unrealistic), a value quite similar to results in the present study.”

    Pretty damning conclusion regarding the efficacy of TNR.

    “No plausible combinations…. would likely allow for TNR to succeed…”.

    In other words – It can’t work.

    Levy, Julie K; “Analysis of the impact of trap-neuter-return programs on populations of feral cats”

  5. The “federal government report estimat[ing] the annual toll of birds killed by cats at nearly 200 million” referenced here is, in fact, badly flawed—largely because its author (on staff at Environment Canada) used as his “estimated” feral cat population wild guesses mentioned in news stories. These figures were completely unsubstantiated. (Readers interested in the details are encouraged to check out my blog post on the subject: http://www.voxfelina.com/2014/04/estimated-number-of-birds-killed-by-house-cats-felis-catus-in-canada/).

    It’s a shame that his indefensible misuse of unsubstantiated guesswork (giving it the appearance of legitimate science) has been ignored entirely here, especially since his “estimate” is being used to fuel the witch-hunt against outdoor cats.

    Peter J. Wolf
    VoxFelina.com

  6. Things are moving here in Halifax although Atlantic Canada is not mentioned in the artcle. We’ve tackled the cat population from all angles and that is what it takes. We have low-cost spay/neuter programs at both shelters, a charitable spay/neuter program, a free TNR program for ferals city wide, and virtually all shelters & rescues only adopt out altered cats. Shelters, rescuers and the public have all come together to tacke the cat population explosion. We have less cats in shelters, less cats & kittens on kijiji, less cats on the street in neighbourhoods. The first feral colony I tackled four years ago with over 20 cats is now down to two cats. It doesn’t take a scientist to tell me that spay & neuter works. I see it with my own eyes. The big problems for cats is humans. If we could just get people to stop abandoning the cats outside, keep their cats inside, we might actually have success. I don’t blame the cats. I blame their irresponsible owners. Next goal, a cat shortage so people who should not own cats will have a harder time to get them.