Board of Inquiry

no-image

The Board of Inquiry report (IV)

Earlier this week, I posted the thoughts of Sebastien Jodoin of Amnesty International in response to the recent Board of Inquiry report. I then wrote to the offices of General Walter Natynczyk and Defence Minister Peter MacKay and offered to post any response to Mr. Jodoin’s comments. Today, a letter arrived from Rear-Admiral Davidson.

no-image

The Board of Inquiry report (III)

Sebastien Jodoin, a law fellow at Amnesty International who is participating in the Military Police Complaints Commission proceedings, sent along some unsolicited thoughts on the BOI report late last week. When I asked if I might post those thoughts here, he sent along more thoughts.

no-image

The Board of Inquiry report (II)

As Rear Admiral P.A. Maddison explained yesterday, there was apparently belief among Canadian Forces that violence was a “cultural norm” among Afghan authorities, but there was no “observation” or “expectation” that detainees were being abused.

no-image

The Board of Inquiry report

The BOI report into the incident of June 14, 2006 is available here. The following is parts E and F of the findings.

no-image

And now, some answers?

The Board of Inquiry report into the events of June 14, 2006 “detainee incident” is due to be released this afternoon.

no-image

‘If there are specific problems’

The Prime Minister responds to last night’s CBC report.

no-image

Contingency and hindsight

CBC obtains the contingency plan the government prepared to deal with public accusations of torture in Afghanistan.

no-image

The pivotal paperwork (V)

For the record, these questions remain unanswered. At last report, the buck was resting with the Justice department.