A proposal to change the way committee chairs are elected
The New Democrats have called a news conference for 10:30am this morning to outline their “plan for ensuring a full study of the Conservative’s omnibus budget bill.” Thomas Mulcair mused this weekend of both “parliamentary” and “legal” options, while environmental groups are planning a national ad campaign.
The Canadian Press reports that the Harper government is suddenly less interested in hearing from the auditor general.
While the Conservatives launch inquiries into the CBC and NDP, another proposal disappears.
Some enterprising filmographer has spliced together a video of Jason Kenney both lamenting that anyone would call a member of a minister’s staff to testify at a Parliamentary committee and, years earlier, listing all the aides and staff members he hopes to hear from at an upcoming Parliamentary committee.
The Parliamentary Law Clerk responds to the Justice Department’s response.
Parliamentary law clerk Robert Walsh tells Ujjal Dosanjh that Parliamentary committees are essentially entitled to whatever they seek.
It’s almost as though there was a sudden interest in committee hearings. Where, oh where could that have come from? Who’s been covering committee hearings in an entertaining and informative manner, live? A Monday-morning puzzle.
Drinking a super-sized sugar-free Red Bull and preparing for another committee triple-header, of course.
I know, I know – Colleague Wells has already liveblogged it, but just to give you a sense of our cuddly, forgiving Prime Minister:
Fresh from the Victoria break — or Honouring Our Monarch week, if you follow the regular Thursday now-I’m-sure-he’s-doing-it-at-least-partly-to-drive-me-crazy theme-ifying by Peter Van Loan — the kids — AKA our esteemed elected representatives – are back in Ottawa, the House is back in session and committees are back in business.
Note to readers: For some reason, while watching Question Period this afternoon, I suddenly had the urge to repost this. I blame Peter Van Loan: