Layton

Canada’s foreign policy, in black and white and orange

There’s a ‘Harper Doctrine’ now? Really?

Coyne v. Wells on the ‘alleged outbreak of civility’ in Parliament

“I’ll take substance with nastiness over civil emptiness, anytime…”

Coyne v. Wells on Harper’s new government and Layton’s new job

A weekly politics podcast with columnists Andrew Coyne and Paul Wells

Coyne v. Wells on why we still have to talk about a coalition

Our columnists talk between stops on the campaign trail

Coyne v. Wells on the looming election

Why the Liberals are worried and how Layton became the man to watch (VIDEO)

Aaron Wherry on why we’re heading to an election

A summary of the opposition’s reaction to the budget

Coyne v. Wells on the budget

Federal budget analysis from inside the press lock-up in Ottawa

Coyne v. Wells on the unlikely possibility of an election

“In Canadian politics, there is no duty, there is no honour, no requirement of logical consistency…”

no-image

Layton gets the shiv

In which Terry Glavin rips Jack Layton’s pretenses on Afgh to shreds.

Today in Quebec punditocracy: après la tempête, la détente

Vincent Marissal, who has always struck me as an eternally cynical fellow, today shows why politics, especially of the type we’ve seen over the last week, is an inherently cynicism-inducing practice. He notes how Stephen Harper’s has often depended on the Bloc Québécois’ support to pass crucial legislation, and whose very tenure as prime minister has been thanks largely to the very separatists he now decries. “Mr. Harper says Bloc MPs have the right to sit in the House of Commons, but must be isolated because they are counter to the ‘real’ interests of Canada,” Marrisal writes. “Coming from a prime minister who has survived his first throne speech in 2006 and a budget in 2007, this is frankly dishonest.” (DMA would also like to point out that the Conservatives bragged very loudly about the Bloc’s support of its measures, back when it was politically expedient to do so.) On the other side of the bench, Marrisal rains on Bob Rae who, for the sake of wanting to lead the Liberal party, endorsed a coalition led by Stéphane Dion. “[Rae] has held onto his dream of leading the party, and doesn’t have the grace to cede his spot to caucus favourite Michael Ignatieff.”

Today in Quebec punditocracy, post-perogy edition

Opinion is a fleeting thing in these fluid days of the Otta-brouhaha™. This morning’s columns, some of which raised the doom-and-gloom spectre of a full-blown ‘national unity crisis’, seem rather quaint since Michaëlle Jean acquiesced and gave parliamentarians a six-week holiday. Still, as Le Devoir’s Michel David points out in a prescient column today, today’s prorogation “only postpones the inevitable” and, at the very worst, only extends what David calls Stephen Harper’s “dangerous game” of flogging the national unity issue for political gain. “When passions arise, nuance disappears,” David writes. “The words ‘separatist’, ‘Québécois and ‘Francophone’ quickly become synonyms. It only takes one instance during a pro-Conservative rally for a bunch of fanatics to stomp on the Quebec flag, like what happened in Brockville in 1989, to put fire to gunpowder.”

no-image

A very different view from the West

You may be surprised with what some notable Western Canadians have been saying this week about the crisis in Ottawa