wafergate-gate

So no less an august body than the New York Times has weighed in on Wafergate-gate, providing an enviably succinct summary of the events to date, but no new insight or additional information. At the moment, it reads like an unfinished cautionary tale, which, as far as ITQ is concerned, is pretty much exactly what it’s turned out to be. We still don’t have anything approaching answers to the myriad questions sparked by the now notorious apology from the Telegraph Journal, despite the best efforts of numerous reporters to find out the story behind the now partially retracted story.  Yes, “reporters”, in the plural — it hasn’t just been ITQ on the Wafergate-gate beat, although as one pointed out to her last week by email, “We just don’t blog on our progress”.

BREAKING! MUST CREDIT ITQ: KINSELLA DENIES INVOLVEMENT IN SO-FAR-UNSUPPORTED-BY-INDEPENDENT-EVIDENCE CLAIM OF DASTARDLY LIBERAL-WITH-A-CAPITAL-L INVOLVEMENT IN COMMUNION HOST STORY!

From the ITQ inbox: