TV Premiere Week: Tuesday - Macleans.ca
 

TV Premiere Week: Tuesday


 

Another run-down of what to expect tonight as premiere week continues. Last night’s ratings brought few big surprises except that Lone Star was a tremendous bomb, something I hadn’t really anticipated — it was so hyped online (the pilot was good, so the hype made some sense) that it distracted attention from the issue of what the show looked like to people who weren’t reading blogs. And if you were just watching the promos, I suppose the show looked like a rather dull soap opera; worse, it featured a man who was cheating on two women (and suggests he loves them both, of course) and presented him as the hero. Good though the pilot was, smarter people than I seem to have realized that that wouldn’t fly on a network where, unlike AMC, 4 million viewers is a disappointment.

Now here come tonight’s premieres on the big 4 networks (don’t forget that the CBC premieres the new season of Being Erica tonight at 9, and Stephen King guest-stars on tonight’s Sons of Anarchy):

8:00
NBC: The Biggest Loser
ABC: Dancing With the Stars, again
CBS: NCIS
Fox: Glee

All very known quantities except for Glee, which has everyone waiting to pounce on it and pronounce that it has the Sophomore Jinx and that the hype is over. I wouldn’t be so sure that the show will decline in quality in the second season; it’s going to get even more meta and have even more gimmicky guests (Gwyneth Paltrow was just announced), but shows like this often take s step forward in their second season, as they have a better sense of what works and what their audience likes to see. The issue is long-term — eventually they give the audience too much of what they think we want, and that’s likely to happen with Glee, a show that wants to give us literally everything we like and double. But a second season could be great fun. (A precedent is My Name is Earl, a similarly all-things-to-all-people show. It burned out badly in its third and fourth seasons, but the second was actually the best.) The real question for Glee is whether the move from 9 to 8 will have any effect on its viewership; despite its links to reality event shows like American Idol, it may not necessarily have the “whole family can watch together” quality that 8 o’clock shows are expected to have these days.

9:00
Fox: Raising Hope
CBS: NCIS: Los Angeles

NCIS: L.A. is another known quantity, the main question at this point being when CBS plans to move it away from its parent and try to use it on its own (it’s bound to happen eventually), and if this is going to be the truly CSI-level franchise the network hopes it will become. Raising Hope is from Greg Garcia, the guy who brought you that show I mentioned earlier, My Name Is Earl; in fact, he came up with it almost as soon as Earl was canceled. It seems similar to that show, maybe a little edgier (read, meaner) as befits a Fox show, with a less diverse cast and a marginally less gimmicky premise. I don’t know if this show will be able to avoid Garcia’s basic contempt for his characters, something he’s been demonstrating ever since his longest-running creation, Yes, Dear. But Earl had lots of funny episodes early on (even Yes, Dear had its moments) and this one also might.

9:30
Fox: Running Wilde

Mitch Hurwitz makes another pilot.
Test audiences all revile it.
So they revise, re-vamp, re-shoot
And bring in David Cross to boot.

There’s no clear indication that the show has improved massively from the original pilot (I’m in the “Odenkirk is better than Cross” camp, and Tobias was my least favourite character on Arrested Development, so his presence isn’t a huge plus for me), and Arnett is not the most plausible of leads — he’s very talented, but comes off like a less charming Joel McHale, and even McHale’s show, good as it is, isn’t popular. If Raising Hope does all right, it might be able to hold on to its audience, though. But I wish Fox had picked up Brent Forrester’s multi-camera pilot about the IRS instead; not only did that have a funny script, but it was produced by Ron Howard, and based on Hurwitz’s work since Arrested Development, I trust Howard’s guidance for a comedy almost more than Hurwitz’s.

10:00
NBC: Parenthood
ABC: Detroit 187

This isn’t actually the premiere of Parenthood; that was last week. The hour will really come into focus next week when The Good Wife comes back. For now, Parenthood seems to be this season what it seemed to be last season, a solid family drama constantly teetering on the edge of soap, but which hasn’t fallen in yet. I wonder if it might improve even more once Friday Night Lights ends its upcoming and (sob) final season, and Jason Katims focuses more of his attention on this one show. Detroit 187 is another show about fighting crime in the city; the twists are that a) It uses Detroit as the setting, making it at least partly a commentary on current economic conditions (though Detroit has been media shorthand for “dying city” since the ’70s at least), and b) It was originally intended as a mockumentary and the idea was scrapped, cementing the modern rule that the mockumentary format is inherently comic — if you see documentary devices, it’s funny. Just ask Casey Affleck.

Finally, I feel that Dancing With The Stars needs a theme song sung to the tune of “Racing With The Clock” from The Pajama Game:

Hurry up,
Hurry up,
Can’t dance well (can’t dance well)
Can’t cance well (can’t dance well)
When you’re dancing with the stars,
When you’re dancing with the stars,
But you can’t vote off
David Hasselhoff,
And you can’t get rid
Of the Palin kid,
And the Brady lady learned her steps on Mars.
So you’ve got no chance when you’re dancing with the,
Dancing, dancing, dancing with the stars
.


 
Filed under:

TV Premiere Week: Tuesday

  1. Tobias was probably one of the best characters on Arrested Development. Once again, you've proven to me that your opinions do nothing but frustrate me. No wonder you always get it wrong.


    • Tobias was probably one of the best characters on Arrested Development. Once again, you've proven to me that your opinions do nothing but frustrate me. No wonder you always get it wrong.

      Having had the same experience reading other people whose opinions are usually different from mine, I sympathize — but I think the only solution is to accept that if I don't like something that doesn't mean you won't like it, and vice versa.

      As for Tobias, I personally found the constant one-note gay jokes annoying and, in the end, pretty weak writing. He wasn't in "Pier Pressure" and I didn't miss him in that episode at all. Again, that doesn't mean you should agree.

      • My point was that if you don't like something, odds are good that I will. And vice versa. And I know that I certainly don't differ a lot from the mainstream, try as I might. Your opinions also generally indicate that they are simply your own views, rarely based on any real information. The Star yesterday had a great piece on Jessalyn Gilsig that gave me much more insight on the upcoming season of Glee than your paltry comparison to My Name is Earl.

        I'm just not certain you fit in with the rest of the bloggers at Macleans. The lack of comments on most of your posts seem to suggest as much, anyway.

        • The Star piece you refer to was an interview with Jessalyn Gilsig, which is all well and good but is different from a blog post where someone writes about his own impressions of the shows and what we might expect from them. The purpose of a post like this is not to give inside information, though there's certainly a place for that — more often in print than on a blog, though.

          I don't know how views of whether a TV show is good or bad can be "based on any real information," though. I mean, obviously it has to be based on information in the sense of being related to the show, and what we see on screen. We can both agree that it is a fact that Tobias had lots of "sounding gay" jokes on Arrested Development. The point then becomes talking about the different opinions we have based on these facts, and the disagreeing is fun.

          I'm just not certain you fit in with the rest of the bloggers at Macleans. The lack of comments on most of your posts seem to suggest as much, anyway.

          Well, you know what they say — a blogger who doesn't seem to fit in may turn out to be a beautiful swan. Though I may have misremembered that story.

          • I think the original story is "a blogger who doesn't seem to fit in may turn out to be Scott Feschuk" :P

            Since most blogs at Macleans are about political issues, where there are lots of very 'aggressive' supporters on both sides, I don't see how comparing this blog to others is really that relevant. I read every day and almost never post.

          • The analrapist business card was worth every other lazy gay joke in the whole series.

            Saw Raising Hope tonight.
            Lovely! I don't think Garcia hates his characters. He hates the characters his characters had to endure.
            And that Wilde show got my wife to laugh out loud. AD is back!

        • There was another time someone claimed that the lack of comments on Jaime's posts was a sign that he wasn't highly thought of by the macleans.ca blog readers.

          What happened then was that many like me chimed in to say that they always read Jaime's posts but don't see the need to place a comment.

          • I actually only go to this website to read Jaime Weinman's blog.

          • I don't comment much because I'd mostly be reduced to "interesting point", "you're right" and the occasional "you're wrong." But it's one of my favorite TV blogs.

  2. Cross was originally supposed to be in the pilot, but was stuck in England (I think after touring with stand-up, with his book, or finishing The Increasingly Poor Decisions of Todd Margaret) when the super volcano hit and he couldn't fly back. Andy Daly filled in, but Cross's casting wasn't because test audiences didn't like the pilot. According to Daly, reshooting the pilot scenes with Cross and having Cross as a regular was always the plan.

  3. How could a Canadian TV reviewer not mention that to night is the return of Rick Mercer????? Proud Canadian Anne

    • Yes, while I enjoy reading Jaime (and Feschuck and Reid) I am disappointed that he sticks almost exclusively to American television (they exclusively cover the NFL).

      Jaime, how could you not mention that Shaun Majumder is on Detroit 1-8-7.