Some books that have influenced me

A few weeks ago, Tyler Cowen challenged bloggers to list the books that have influenced them the most. It’s become a hot little blogospheric meme, but like a few others, I’m skeptical of these sorts of exercises as true measures of intellectual influence. One reason is that, like one theory of quantum mechanics I remember reading about once, the very act of consciously trying to make the list has a distorting effect. There’s also a lot of post-facto rationalization going on, interpreting past reading interests in light of current beliefs and dispositions.

But for me, the main obstacle to a decent list is that the “book” category isn’t necessarily the best unit of influence on my intellectual makeup. Sure, I’ve read a lot of great books, but what has shaped my views on most topics are specific arguments, from conversations, a couple of lines in a book, a journal article, etc.  For even the best books I’ve read, the ultimate take-away can usually be summed up in a paragraph or two.

So what I’ll try to do here is list some of the positions I’ve been arrived at, and their book-length sources when appropriate. If I had made this list yesterday it would probably have been quite different; if I were to do the exercise again Monday it would be more different still. Anyway:

Semantic holism and ontological relativism: Quine’s Word and Object; Rorty’s Contingency, Irony, Solidarity

Evolution through natural selection: Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker (basically, just one paragraph in the entire book makes the entire argument)

All intentionality is derived intentionality: Dennett, The Intentional Stance

Political Liberalism: Kant, filtered largely through Rawls, but even him largely through Arthur Ripstein’s Equality, Responsibility, and the Law.

The state as the insurance agent of last resort: Joe Heath’s The Efficient Society changed my views forever; an excellent book is David Moss’s When All Else Fails.

Political Eustonianism: Paul Berman’s Terror and Liberalism and Power and the Idealists.

The centrality of status-seeking to human culture: The Theory of the Leisure Class by Veblen is a must-read, as is everything by Tom Wolfe. Also Paul Fussell’s Class; Fukuyama’s The End of History

The priority of institutions to culture: I’m not sure where I got this conviction from; mostly from talking to Joe Heath and Daniel Weinstock I guess.

The primacy of Cabinet over Parliament (i.e. anti Bagehotism): Ned Franks, The Parliament of Canada.

Humour as literature: Amis, Lucky Jim; Amis II, Money; Nabokov, Pnin

The possibilities of journalism: All of Orwell, but especially The Road to Wigan Pier.

The meaning of life: The writings of Chuang Tzu; Raymond Smullyan, The Tao is Silent; Catch and Release by Mark Kingwell (he doesn’t agree, but it is his best book)

Looking for more?

Get the best of Maclean's sent straight to your inbox. Sign up for news, commentary and analysis.