In Quebec City, a moment of painful truth

In the wake of the Ste-Foy attack, Quebec is forced to face a dark record of right-wing rhetoric and dog-whistle politics

Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks during funeral ceremonies for three of the victims of the deadly shooting at the Quebec Islamic Cultural Centre, in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, February 2, 2017. (Chris Wattie/Reuters)

Equipped with a pressure hose and squeegee, Corey Fleischer traverses the province of Quebec erasing swastikas and anti-Muslim slurs. As the owner of a graffiti removal business based in Montreal, the 36-year-old commonly sees incendiary slogans like, “Stop Islam” and “Only the white matters.” When police don’t respond, Fleischer gets calls to wash away the offending words. “This is something that I’ve been screaming about at the top of my lungs for years,” he says, noting one incident in December of more than 20 swastikas on a building in Laval. “If that’s not [hateful activity] that the police should be focusing on, then I don’t know what is.”

What Fleischer read as danger signs have for years been dismissed by Quebec’s political leaders and public officials as the work of a lunatic fringe—an ugly nuisance with scant links to Quebec’s efforts to protect its values and identity. But as the scenes of anguish poured in from Ste-Foy, Que.—fatherless children in tears; the blood-spattered floor of a well-attended mosque—more than a few were seized by doubts. The man suspected of shooting up the Centre Culturel Islamique had voiced support, after all, for politicians who’ve toyed with far-right rhetoric in the name of preserving values, before he embarked on a rampage that killed six and wounded 19. And while the connection between dog-whistle politics and the workings of a murderous mind may never be proven, some in positions of influence seemed eager to try. “Freedom of speech has consequences, good ones and bad ones,” said Philippe Couillard, Quebec’s Liberal premier. “Words can hurt. Words can be knives slashing at people’s consciousness.”


This will be, to put it mildly, an awkward conversation. The night after the shooting, both Couillard and Justin Trudeau spoke at a vigil outside the mosque, reassuring Muslims that they live in a diverse and welcoming society. Beside them, however, stood Parti-Quebecois leader Jean-François Lisée, who had helped concoct Quebec’s so-called Charter of Values, a piece of legislation introduced by the PQ government in 2013 that would have compelled all provincial public servants to remove religious symbols like hijabs during work hours.

The new Parti Quebecois leader Jean-Francois Lisee speaks to supporters after he was elected at the Parti Quebecois leadership event in Levis Que. on Friday, October 7, 2016. (Jacques Boissinot/CP)

At the time, administrators of the Centre Culturel Islamique spoke out, saying such a law would “feed the perception of discrimination between Quebecers,” and the legislation didn’t pass. But Lisée wasn’t done. In the run-up to last summer’s PQ leadership vote, he penned an online op-ed saying burqas should be banned in Quebec before “a jihadist uses one to hide his movements”—an image he later augmented by suggesting the full-body garments could be used to conceal AK-47 assault rifles. Also at the vigil was Coalition Avenir leader Francois Legault, whose party has spent considerable political oxygen musing about banning the so-called “burkini” from Quebec beaches.

For some at the ceremony, the cognitive dissonance was too much. Hakim Merdassi, a member of the city’s Tunisian association, addressed himself to the political leaders standing behind him when came time for him to speak, saying, “What happened wasn’t anodyne, Mr. Politicians. Some of you have been pyromaniac firefighters, and today we have all been burned.” Quebec City Mayor Régis Labeaume, clearly devastated, said the killings “were an opportunity to reject those who enrich themselves through hate.”

The mayor’s remark, though subtle, was a shot to the heart of those who’ve been exploiting the growing market for anti-Muslim sentiment—especially on private radio. When someone left a severed pig’s head outside the same Ste-Foy mosque less than a year ago, radio host Eric Duhaime appeared more upset about police opening an investigation than the crime directed at those who pray inside. “Is it written in the Criminal Code that I’m not allowed to gave a pig’s head wrapped in plastic with a note saying ‘Bon appétit?’ ” he asked listeners on FM93. “It may be a silly joke and I’m not trying to defend it. How is it hate?” Dominic Maurais, who hosts a conservative talk show on CHOI 98.1, regularly invites former PQ cabinet minister Jacques Brassard for discussions on Islam. Brassard has supplied insights such as, “the terrorists who threaten the world at the moment are all Muslims.”

They’ve been the pronounced voice of an anti-immigrant subcurrent that has gained strength in Quebec since the small town of Hérouxville made international headlines by drafting a “code of conduct” for immigrants in 2007, despite its near-total lack of newcomers (the code, later watered down by council, warned that the stoning of women and female genital mutilation, among other atrocities, would not be tolerated in the community of 1,300). Three years later, an Egyptian student named Naema Ahmed got expelled from her French class by Quebec education officials because she wouldn’t take off her niqab. And when a Muslim mother of two was accidentally strangled to death after her hijab and hair got tangled on one of Montreal’s subway escalators, online commenters chimed in with remarks like: “This is what you get for deciding to keep it on.”

No matter how hard the forces of pluralism try, suspicion toward Muslims has been hard to dislodge. Between 2009 and 2013, according to Angus Reid surveys, unfavourable opinion of Islam in Quebec held steady around 69 per cent, fully 19 points higher than that seen in the rest of the country. Meanwhile, about half of Quebecers surveyed, 48 per cent, said it would be unacceptable for one of their offspring to marry a Muslim. Less than one-third of Canadians outside Quebec felt the same way. And when the Canada Race Relations Foundation did its own study last year, it found that while half of English-Canadians held a positive view of Muslims, only a quarter of French-Canadians felt the same way.

Alexandre Bissonnette is escorted to a van after appearing in court for the deadly shooting at a mosque, Monday, January 30, 2017 in Quebec City. (Jacques Boissinot/CP)

Where the man accused of the massacre fell on this spectrum is only starting to come clear. Alexandre Bissonnette, 27, had a Facebook history showing “likes” for U.S. president Donald Trump and far-right French politician Marine Le Pen. And while that hardly tells the whole story—now-deceased NDP leader Jack Layton and Garfield the cartoon cat count among his other likes—close friends have begun to fill in the blanks. In interviews with various media outlets, they’ve described Laval Université student as a gun-loving ultra-nationalist enamoured by the alt-right movement, and a devout reader of far right websites like Breitbart and Infowars. Though he grew up in the middle class Cap-Rouge suburb of Quebec City, he despised Muslims, some say, and was critical of Canada’s plan to welcome Syrian refugees. “He didn’t like the Muslim religion,” one friend told the National Post. “But he never said he wanted to exterminate them or that he considered them an inferior race.”

François Deschamps, who runs a refugee-support Facebook page in Quebec City, instantly recognized Bissonnette’s photo on the news. He is “unfortunately known to several activists,” Deschamps later wrote, for posting pro-Le Pen and anti-feminist comments online. Another friend told the Globe and Mail: “I wrote him off as a xenophobe. I didn’t even think of him as totally racist, but he was enthralled by a borderline racist nationalist movement.”

It’s all been enough to chasten the likes of Lisée, who the day after the mosque shooting acknowledged his remark about burqas being used to hide AK-47s was ill-advised. Radio host Maurais told the New York Times that the tone on the air needs to be more respectful, though not to the point that political correctness trumps his panel’s frank talk about Islamic values. And as spontaneous vigils honouring the dead popped up from Digby, N.S., to Calgary City Hall, a sense of collective responsibility prevailed—as if the show of numbers on its own might contain the forces of hatred.

Yet even as the mourners assembled, at least one Quebec City shock jock was denying all hint of responsibility, complaining to his listeners about critics who “stir the pot” in search of someone to blame for the massacre. “I find it irresponsible, adolescent,” added Jeff Fillion of CHOI 98.1FM. “There is one person responsible.”

And for Fleischer, alas, business remains as brisk as ever. After five days out of commission with the flu, he faced a backlog of requests to remove graphics as hateful as any he’s seen, noting ruefully, “I have close to 10 already waiting for me.”

—with Martin Patriquin and Michael Friscolanti