TV Squad points out the oddity of leaving The West Wing off the list (particularly since they included Sports Night). I also agree that NewsRadio should be on any list of the great ’90s shows, though I’m not surprised that it wasn’t included. I would have put King of the Hill on any such list, and even though I don’t care for Family Guy, I’m surprised that it didn’t make the list.
Otherwise, it’s not a bad list; there are choices I don’t agree with, and other choices that I find odd even though I agree with them (I think Spin City belongs on a top 40 list; I just didn’t expect anyone else to think so). The ’90s had their good points and bad points like any TV decade, but in many ways it was one of the better eras for television. Normally the two tentpoles of television, comedy and drama, are of unequal health: one is strong while the other is weak. So comedy was strong in the ’70s, but drama was not in great shape; drama was very strong for most of this decade while comedy was very weak. But the ’90s were pretty strong in both areas, because the first part of the decade produced a comedy explosion (with the huge success and influence of Seinfeld, Friends, Larry Sanders and The Simpsons among others) and hour-long dramas, while they didn’t fully come into their own until near the end of the decade, were learning some of the lessons of the late ’80s and moving towards more continuing storylines and more character development than we used to expect.
A lot of this was riding on the ’90s bubble: economic giddiness, new networks popping up all over the place, expensive development deals for writers — and comedy, in particular, was strangled by the attempts to imitate the success of the early ’90s hits. But it was a pretty strong era for comedy and drama, which is unusual. (The early ’60s also were pretty strong in both areas, and the ’50s had big successes in both comedy and drama, mostly of the live-from-New-York kind.)