Earlier today Dick Cheney made a speech in which he defended enhanced interrogations of high-value detainees and said that intelligence gained from the interrogations was used to prevent specific attacks. He went on to make the allegation that:
Earlier today Dick Cheney made a speech in which he defended enhanced interrogations of high-value detainees and said that intelligence gained from the interrogations was used to prevent specific attacks. He went on to make the allegation that:
“This might explain why President Obama has reserved unto himself the right to order the use of enhanced interrogation should he deem it appropriate. What value remains to that authority is debatable, given that the enemy now knows exactly what interrogation methods to train against, and which ones not to worry about. Yet having reserved for himself the authority to order enhanced interrogation after an emergency, you would think that President Obama would be less disdainful of what his predecessor authorized after 9/11.”
“It’s almost gone unnoticed that the president has retained the power to order the same methods in the same circumstances. When they talk about interrogations, he and his administration speak as if they have resolved some great moral dilemma in how to extract critical information from terrorists. Instead they have put the decision off, while assigning a presumption of moral superiority to any decision they make in the future.”
Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs was just on CNN saying this is absolutely untrue.