1

REVIEW: Encyclopedia Gothica

Book by Liisa Ladouceur


 

Encyclopedia gothicaWhat do Aqua Net, Johnny Depp and Denny’s have in common? Spoiler alert: they’re all staples of the goth community. But unless you are—or were—a child of darkness, or were lucky enough to birth one, it’s unlikely you mundanes (that’s what they call us) would understand. And so, just in time for Halloween, a.k.a. goth Christmas, Toronto journalist Liisa Ladouceur, Canada’s only goth expert, writes “a compilation and celebration of our obsessions, our heroes, our humour—and our hairstyles.” Ladouceur lists more than 600 words and phrases—everything from absinthe to corsets—that define goth.

This is no easy task. The word “goth” refers to music, fashion, architecture, literature, cinema and more. Confusing factions include cybergoths, romantigoths, trad goths, corp goths, mall goths (or doom cookies), kindergoths and recovering goths. Ask a goth person what goth is and they’ll promptly tell you they’re not goth—“which is a sure sign that they are.” Ladouceur explains her take on what’s definitively goth (Edgar Allan Poe, bondage pants), honorary goth (Nick Cave, Bettie Page), possibly goth (Iggy Pop, Mary Janes) and definitely not goth (the Columbine shooters, Twilight).

There are repetitions, but Encyclopedia Gothica, contrary to what you might think of goth culture, doesn’t take itself too seriously. Just the opposite: Ladouceur’s humour is a welcome rarity in an oft-misunderstood subculture. She even lets us norms in on some inside goth jokes: “Nice boots” is the ultimate pickup line, and “goth points” measure your score from gothier-than-thou to total poseur. Somehow, Ladouceur finds a balance between the two, staying legit to her dark minions and accessible to the rest of us. Now let’s all dance to the Time Warp and enjoy the festivities.


 
Filed under:

REVIEW: Encyclopedia Gothica

  1. The too-easy, too-familiar snarky tone of Encyclopedia Gothica by Liisa Ladouceur is tiresome, and it’s not nearly as funny as it thinks it is, especially after reading more than a few entries. Ambitious attempt (it is an encyclopedia, after all), but the writing is inadequate (feels like many entries had to be fluffed up) and not up to the scope of the project. (Was hoping for Bela Lugosi’s Dead, but got Tower of Strength). Two out of five stars.

Sign in to comment.