Israel’s best friend: Stephen Harper

The Prime Minister’s support seems less strategic than a reflection of his deeply held personal beliefs

by Nick Taylor-Vaisey

Chris Wattie/Reuters

Stephen Harper looked ever so relaxed, standing among friends, as he spoke to thousands assembled for a glitzy annual gala at the Metro Toronto Convention Centre on Dec. 1. He strode across the stage in an untucked black shirt and slacks, a wardrobe giveaway that he would perform with Herringbone, the Harper-led musical act that informally serves as the Conservative party’s house band. Harper spoke for several minutes without notes—a relative rarity for the Prime Minister—and the crowd reciprocated with an immediate, and prolonged, standing ovation. Then, the Prime Minister played a few tunes. The warmth in the room was palpable as the Jewish National Fund feted Harper at its Negev Dinner, as thanks for his long-standing and unapologetic defence of the Israeli cause.

Conservatives won the support of 52 per cent of Jewish voters during the last federal election, a departure from prior elections stretching back for decades. Conservative politicians have coalesced behind the Prime Minister, and now stand in lockstep with his stridently pro-Israel agenda. Tim Hudak, Ontario’s Opposition leader, leapt to his feet when Harper announced that he would visit the Middle East in 2014. Julian Fantino, the veterans affairs minister, beamed as the Prime Minister belted out the words to the Who’s restless hit, The Seeker. Karen Stintz, a Toronto mayoral candidate set to take on Ford Nation, soaked in the festivities. Harper, who almost never pours his heart out in public, acknowledged that the affair was “a show of affection and love,” and assured the crowd the feeling was mutual. The people behind the gala made one thing clear: No longer are Jews nervous about voting Conservative.

That wasn’t always so. Liberals used to be able to count on waves of Jewish support at the polls, and they benefited from the perception among Jews that extremists in the Conservative ranks were not to be trusted. But there was no strict ideological opposition to right-leaning parties, says Shimon Fogel, the CEO of the Centre for Jewish and Israel Affairs. He says the last Conservative prime minister was held in similarly high regard. “There was significant affection for, and appreciation directed at, Brian Mulroney,” says Fogel. “It didn’t translate uniformly to the party that he represented.” The emergence of the Reform movement, and the Canadian Alliance that followed, only spooked wary Jewish voters. Frank Dimant, the CEO of B’nai Brith Canada, recalls that Israeli officials, long accustomed to their Liberal counterparts in Ottawa, were “very skeptical” of the fractured right wing. But then, in 2004, along came Harper and the united right.

Dimant’s first encounter with Harper wasn’t altogether warm, he says. In fact, it was “a little bit cool.” When the Jewish leader asked the then-opposition leader if he’d continue a tradition of booting anti-Semites from caucus—an agreement B’nai Brith arranged with prior Reform and Alliance leaders—Harper inquired sharply about whether or not Jewish leaders had sought the same assurances from the Liberals. “That floored all of us, quite frankly,” says Dimant. But don’t mistake that for disillusionment on Dimant’s part. “I’ve seen him many times over the years, privately and with delegations, and have found him to be forthright,” he says.

Eventually, Harper’s approach connected with the broader Jewish community. “Jews started to realize that they finally had a leader who felt the same way about their issues as our community,” says Sen. Linda Frum, whom Harper appointed to the Senate in 2009. “I think Jews had been Liberals because they figured they would get the most sensitivity for their perspective. But I think they’ve figured out, slowly, that this was an illusion.” Frum insists the community simply grew tired of Liberal abstentions at the United Nations and the notion that, when Israelis and Palestinians quarrel, Canada should “consider the grievances of both sides equally.” When Harper infuriated Israel’s critics by declaring the country’s 2006 rocket attacks on Hezbollah a “measured response,” Jews loved what they heard. The friendship was sealed.

Those remarks, and similarly friendly comments that have helped define Harper’s foreign policy, may have emboldened his opposition at home—but they also assured him of thousands of new friends. Dimant recalls the reception that Harper received at a 2006 event where he wasn’t even the guest of honour. Walter Arbib, a Jewish-Canadian philanthropist, was supposed to gather all the accolades—but everyone wanted to talk to the Prime Minister. “He couldn’t eat his meal because people didn’t stop coming over to shake his hand,” says Dimant. And, if any Israelis clung to any doubts about their new Conservative friends, those have long since vanished. “I think it’s fair to say that he’s the most popular politician in Israel, bar none, including any of their own. He’s a rock star in Israel,” says Frum, adding that Israelis are “thrilled” that a new visitor’s centre at an environmentally sensitive bird sanctuary, built partially with the $5.7 million raised at Harper’s Toronto tribute, will bear the Prime Minister’s name. “The fact that they’ve chosen to associate it with Stephen Harper’s name is as meaningful a tribute as I think Israel can offer,” says Fogel.

The political advantage in Canada to such a pro-Israel stance is unclear. “Going after the Jewish vote is not great political strategy,” says Frum. “I think it’s almost a disadvantage,” says Dimant. A handful of ridings, including key constituencies in Toronto and Montreal, can be tilted by Jewish support. But that’s about it, in stark electoral terms. Frum says the polls are not what drives Harper’s support for Israel. “These are his genuine, and true, and deeply held convictions, and he feels he has no choice,” she says. “He’s not going to take a different position because it’s politically advantageous.” Indeed, the Prime Minister told the gala audience in Toronto that his affection for Israel comes not from political ambition, but rather his father’s own fervent belief in the then-fledgling nation.

Nevertheless, Liberals want to win back the Jewish vote they counted on for so long. Justin Trudeau, the Liberal leader, recently reiterated his party’s position that Canada “must always be a strong, true friend of Israel.” His chief fundraiser, Stephen Bronfman, claimed Trudeau was a closer friend to Israel than the Prime Minister, because he’s actually visited the place. That advantage evaporates next year, when Harper sets off for Israel, especially because, Dimant claims, the trip’s not a token drop-in. “I think it’s going to be both a political journey to Israel, but also a spiritual journey,” he says.

As he accepted his Toronto tribute, Harper referred to the countries surrounding Israel as a “region of darkness,” juxtaposed against a Jewish state that he called a “light of freedom and democracy.” Canadians may disagree about the substance of that characterization, but everyone can agree about one thing: On matters of Israel, the Prime Minister is utterly immovable.




Browse

Israel’s best friend: Stephen Harper

  1. “The political advantage in Canada to such a pro-Israel stance is
    unclear. “Going after the Jewish vote is not great political strategy,”
    says Frum.”

    That’s right. Irving Gerstein just sits there and twiddles his thumbs.

    • They’re not after votes but contributions.

  2. Probably most Canadians would like a more balanced approach to our position on the middle east, but it’s number 3425 on the list of things they consider when voting. There’s not really much of an anti-Israel or pro-arab states vote that you can bank on in Canada. So to the extent that you can grab votes from people by taking a position on the middle east, the only way to go about it is to be noticeably more strident on the matter than the party of Irwin Cotler.

  3. “These are his genuine, and true, and deeply held convictions, and he
    feels he has no choice,” she says. “He’s not going to take a different
    position because it’s politically advantageous.”

    ***

    “i would rather lose an election than withdraw from Afghanistan” – Stephen harper 2008 (paraphrasing)

  4. The thing is he’s supposed to represent Canada’s views, not his personal views. He’s supporting a racist country that committing ethnic cleansing in the Negev as we speak.

    • @Nite_Owl: The thing is he’s supposed to represent Canada’s views, not his personal views.
      That’s exactly the point.

    • And all the murderous dictatorships surrounding Israel and determined to wipe it off the map are a bunch of great guys that Canada should be supporting instead.

      Hahahahahahahahahahahaha! Stop it! You’re breaking me up, clown!

      • This comment was deleted.

        • Israel’s hands aren’t exactly clean, but your comparison may be a bit harsh, there.

      • Oy! Even the Israelis have a more nuanced and intelligent view than that!

  5. Yup, that’s Harp’s religion we’re looking at….not a decent foreign policy. Canada gets no benefit from allying with Israel, neither does the US….it’s all religion.

    And Jews are well aware that fundies are using them to hasten the Rapture, and that they are playing with fire in encouraging it.

    Harper is in fantasyland as usual.

    • Pretty funny how you try to make someone with principles look like a religious zealot when in fact it has nothing to do with religion.

      Harper is not religious. Look it up.

      • Harper is very religious….a member of the Christian and Missionary alliance…..an evangelist.

        Where have YOU been??

    • This comment was deleted.

      • Yup….all fundies….any religion…. are lunatics. Be nice if we could put them all on an island and let them fight it out amonst themselves and leave the rest of us alone.

  6. Hooray for P.M. Harper!
    God bless Canada.

    • Where are the pom-poms? Can you do the splits?

  7. 57 million dollars was raised at that Jewish tribute, money which is tax deductible and will be spent in Israel to support Jewish jobs. That’s essentially money that should have gone to Canada tax base. This is more than Harper’s love for his favourite country, it’s an increased tax burden for the rest of Canadians to pay for it.

  8. Those opposed to these policies should form their own voting block. In the long run, such totally one-sided positioning is not in Canada’s interests. Do we want to be on the side of troubled but burgeoning democratic movements or military strongmen. THe strongmen will fall sooner or later, and hard core Netanyahu types would have us turn our backs on the millions of people in the Middle East who want something better. There is blame on both sides of this conflict, and both sides have missed opportunities for peace. Reflexive support for every Israeli policy will not help achieve a peace accord. After all, peace agreements with Egypt and Jordan were opposed by Israeli hawks, and the outside world had to exert pressure on both sides to make it happen. A slightly mollified Iran, while still dangerous, is better than what we have now.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *