War of 1812: Did the Americans throw the fight?

A provocative author says a wealthy businessman paid the U.S. to abandon a winning strategy

by Peter Shawn Taylor

The real reason we won?

Frederic Remington Art Museum, Ogdensburg, NY

An American victory over Canada in the War of 1812 should have been dead simple. Besides a huge advantage in manpower and resources, the United States Army also enjoyed the benefit of an obvious winning strategy. “The St. Lawrence River was the lifeline for the entire British force in North America,” recounts Maj. John R. Grodzinski, history professor at the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ont. “Every regular soldier in Upper Canada, every musket, artillery piece and shot plus most of their food and communications moved along that river.” American control of the St. Lawrence would have instantly starved the colony of men, supplies and information. After that, victory was inevitable.

And yet the American army never put such a strategy into effect. Instead of quickly going for the jugular, it spent most of its time and effort on the bloody hinterlands of the Canadian frontier, in places like Niagara Falls and other areas in southwestern Ontario; the St. Lawrence was left in British hands. Why?

Hidden away in U.S. historian Alan Taylor’s 2010 book The Civil War of 1812 is a provocative, if ultimately unproven, explanation for America’s reluctance to pursue this winning strategy: Washington was paid to throw the war.

If money, rather than tactics or patriotism, was behind the British victory then it’s not those familiar heroes such as Sir Isaac Brock, Tecumseh or Laura Secord we should be celebrating during the 200th anniversary of the War of 1812. Rather it’s David Parish, a German-born financier and upstate New York landowner, who deserves credit as the real saviour of Canada.

“One of the most important reasons why the Americans frittered away their forces on marginal theatres during the War of 1812 is the political clout of Parish, one of the richest men in America at the time,” says Taylor. Parish settled in Ogdensburg, N.Y., on the south shore of the St. Lawrence in 1808 after making his fortune arranging a massive shipment of gold and silver bullion from Mexico to Napoleon’s France. His plan was to turn Ogdensburg into a booming metropolis modelled after his hometown of Hamburg, Germany, and he built roads, mills, stores and factories to attract settlers. Before the war, the area’s primary business was selling food to British troops in Prescott, Ont. “Both sides of the river benefited from this commerce and were appalled at the thought of war,” says Ed LaVarnway, executive director of the Frederic Remington Art Museum in Ogdensburg, and a local historian well-versed in the era.

The arrival of war saw Ogdensburg’s lucrative trading business disrupted by a series of tit-for-tat cross-river raids. Parish, a savvy political operative with connections among both the British and U.S. leadership, sought to protect his investment by moving this bothersome war as far away as possible. “As long as we are not annoyed by the presence of American troops,” Parish wrote, “I apprehend no danger.” But how to get the two armies to leave such a crucial battle zone alone?

As the war dragged into 1813, the U.S. government soon found itself facing a financial crisis, and in need of Parish’s aid. The bulk of federal revenues came from customs duties, which soon dried up due to a successful British naval blockade of the Atlantic seaboard. A helpful Parish arranged a crucial $16-million bond deal that allowed Washington to pay its bills. But as quid pro quo for the bond issue, Taylor argues, Parish demanded the U.S. military abandon the St. Lawrence Valley. “I believe this is the reason they insisted on fighting the war in places they could not win,” he says.

Would the U.S. government really agree to abandon a winning strategy in exchange for $16 million? “There is no smoking gun,” the historian admits. “This is a circumstantial case.” He bolsters his argument with letters from British officers describing their tacit understanding with Parish’s agents that American soldiers would avoid the area and the British would refrain from provocative attacks. Taylor also points out the transfer of funds coincides with a U.S. military withdrawal from the area.

The lone incursion by American forces into the St. Lawrence Valley after the bond deal, a campaign that culminated in a British victory at Crysler’s Farm in late 1813, is the exception that proves his rule, says Taylor. The U.S. commander had orders to attack Kingston but decided instead to head downriver. “The whole operation was thoroughly botched and ended in utter failure,” he notes. “And it was never repeated.”

Ogdensburg’s LaVarnway, whose museum is located in Parish’s old mansion, favours this controversial payoff theory. “I find Taylor’s thesis to be highly plausible,” he says. “It fits with what I have seen of Parish’s correspondence. He was a businessman, first and foremost.”

Not everyone is convinced. Military historian Grodzinski explains the mystery of the St. Lawrence Valley in more practical terms. “Events along the river are suggestive of the general lack of resolve throughout the United States toward the war” rather than the mark of any one man’s efforts, he says. “This was a very complex conflict.” Grodzinski also notes that, late in the war, American high command actually drew up plans to flood the St. Lawrence Valley with 20,000 men in a full-on assault against the British colony’s central nervous system. Either Parish’s influence had waned by then, or it simply took the Americans that long to get down to business. Regardless, the plan was abandoned once a peace treaty was ratified in 1815.

As for Parish, perhaps Canada’s greatest ally in the war, his grand vision for Ogdensburg was never fulfilled. He lost his fortune in an Austrian bank fraud and drowned himself in the Danube River in 1826.




Browse

War of 1812: Did the Americans throw the fight?

  1. Yes I’m sure that someone from the USA would say that they threw the fight. It is sour grapes.

    I also read yesterday that another historian mentioned the British elite veterans of the Napoleonic Wars who fought against the USA as an explanation as to why the USA lost. The reality is that the War of 1812 was fought during–not after– the Napoleonic Wars. The British soldiers sent to help defend Canada were garrison troops, second rate troops, not elite veterans. The British priority was Europe and defeating the French. The War of 1812 was a minor sideshow to them.

    The USA has never had a great military and has preferred to fight as members of alliances. In these alliances their most useful role has been as supplier of munitions, food, medicine, etc. They are good at that. But they have a long history of letting their allies do all of the heavy fighting for them, then taking all of the credit for themselves. Their ‘real’ military victories are on Hollywood sound stages, not in the actual battlefield. The high German command during WW 2 nicknamed the USA “Churchill’s Italians” because of the US Army’s lack of fighting spirit. After the Korean War, Mao, having seen the US Army performance, referred to them as ‘Paper Tigers’. This historian is grasping for an explanation as to why they lost the War of 1812. I would just suggest that they look at the US Army’s real track record rather than believing their own self-written pseudo-history. Check out the original records. Don’t rely on the Hollywood version of events.

    • The Americans lost the War of 1812 and have never had a great military? What hubris. I won’t say the Americans won the War of 1812, but I can’t say they lost it either. It was a draw. At the very least, they got the British and their Indian ALLIES out of what was then called the Northwest Territory and settled the boundary. I don’t buy the “they threw the war” theory. The Americans mistakenly thought Canada would be ripe pickings and that most Canadians would welcome being liberated from Great Britain. Wrong on that score, to be sure.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *