The secret Omar Khadr file

Child soldier. Convicted terrorist. Khadr is about to return to Canada, but no one has been able to see his full seven-hour interview at Guantánamo Bay. Until now.

The secret Khadr file

Colin Perkel/CP

Omar Khadr has spent so much of his young life answering questions. (Some honestly, some not.) The faces of his interrogators have changed over the years—men, women, American, Canadian—but the questions rarely did. The gist of every grilling was the same. How does a 15-year-old kid from Toronto end up on the front lines of Afghanistan? What was your father’s relationship with Osama bin Laden? Did you throw the grenade that killed Sgt. Christopher Speer? (As one CSIS spy famously told him: “You didn’t just fall off the turnip truck . . . You could probably tell us a lot of interesting things.”)

On June 15, 2010, the man asking the questions was not a nameless interrogator. It was Michael Welner, a prominent forensic psychiatrist based in New York. Hired by Pentagon prosecutors, Welner’s job was, among other things, to personally assess Khadr in advance of his much-anticipated war crimes trial. When they sat down together that Tuesday morning, inside the razor wire of Guantánamo Bay, Khadr was a few months shy of his 24th birthday. With a full beard and a muscular frame, he looked nothing like the bony teenager who was shot and captured by U.S. troops eight years before.

“If I had to ask you about the five worst memories that you have in your life, what are they?” Welner asked him.

“Well, there is one huge, horrible memory and it’s still going, which is where we are right now,” Khadr answered. He was sitting in a chair, his feet chained to the floor.

“What do you mean?” Welner asked.

“Well, if I get released, I wouldn’t want to remember this place.”

“You mean Guantánamo?”

“Yes.”

As they spoke, a video camera recorded their every word.

“What are the five things that you most regret in your life?” Welner asked.

“Regrets?” Khadr replied.

“Yes.”

“I don’t think I had a choice in my life to regret anything, because I didn’t make any choices to regret them.”

“What would you say the five worst things you’ve done in your life have been?”

“I don’t blame myself for anything that I didn’t have a choice to do.”

“But I asked you a different question,” Welner said. “We’re talking about the regret. What would you say are the five worst things that you’ve ever done?”

“That’s going to have to be somebody who has more experience to say what I did was wrong or not,” Khadr answered.

As the camera rolled, Welner asked Khadr what he misses most about his former life.

“Being loved,” he answered, his voice barely a whisper.

“Pardon?” Welner said.

“Being loved,” Khadr repeated.

“Do you think about that a lot?”

“I try not to think about my miseries.”

For a moment, Khadr rested his head on the table in front of him, filling the room with a brief silence. As he reached for a tissue, wiping his nose and his eyes, Welner continued to ask about his hopes and desires.

“There’s lots of things I miss,” Khadr replied, now sitting back up. “I miss being trusted.”

“Can you help me understand that a little more?” Welner asked.

“Nobody trusts me, and they don’t trust me because of something I didn’t do or I was made to do. I was never given a chance.”

“So, you miss feeling loved and you miss being trusted. Whom else do you miss and what else do you miss?

“I miss my family and the sense of security,” he said.

“Why do I get a sense that you don’t really feel close to anybody in this world?”

“How can I be close to anybody?” Khadr replied. “I’m trying. It just doesn’t feel that anybody is giving me his hand.”

Four months after uttering those words, Omar Khadr stood up in front of a U.S. military commission and pleaded guilty to five charges, including the battlefield murder of Sgt. Speer, a Delta Force medic and father of two. In an agreed statement of facts, the cornerstone of his plea, Khadr admitted that he threw the fatal grenade on July 27, 2002, that he was a loyal al-Qaeda fighter obsessed with killing Americans “anywhere they can be found,” and that his Canadian father was a leading figure in bin Laden’s network.

At Khadr’s sentencing hearing in October 2010, Welner testified for the prosecution, describing his interview subject as “full of rage” and “highly dangerous”—a “rock star” at Gitmo who has not only expressed zero remorse, but has spent years “marinating in a community of hardened and belligerent radical Islamists.” In Welner’s words, Khadr has grown up to be “al-Qaeda royalty.”

Although a military jury sentenced him to 40 years in prison (15 more than even prosecutors requested), the plea deal ensured that Khadr would serve no more than eight. The agreement also included another provision: after spending 12 more months in Cuba, Khadr would be allowed to request a transfer to a Canadian prison. (Ottawa was not involved in the negotiations, but Stephen Harper’s government did send a diplomatic note to the Americans, saying it would be “inclined to favourably consider” such a transfer request.)

Two years later, Khadr remains in a solitary cell at Guantánamo Bay. The White House is partially responsible for the delay; it took the Americans until April—18 months after Khadr’s guilty plea—to officially approve his transfer. But Vic Toews, Canada’s public safety minister, has also prolonged the process. In July, he asked the Pentagon to hand over a copy of Welner’s jailhouse interview, as well as another videotaped assessment conducted by a U.S. army psychologist. Amazingly, the Harper government says it only recently discovered (through media reports) that the videos exist—and that it needs to view them before ruling on Khadr’s application.

The Pentagon delivered the tapes in early September, on the strict condition that only select officials view the sealed footage. The rest of Khadr’s fellow Canadians are not allowed to hear what he said.

Until now.

Maclean’s has viewed a complete transcript of Welner’s seven-hour interview—the most candid glimpse yet of the “real” Omar Khadr. For a man whose story has been told so many times by so many other people (journalists, authors, documentary filmmakers, lawyers from all sides), the Welner interview is a public rarity: Khadr in his own words.

At times, he sounds like the victim he claims to be: a “child” thrust into war, exploited by “everybody” and haunted by nightmares. A “very peaceful person,” he longs to return to Canada—“a place that I could call home”—and move on with his life. (At one point, he reminisced about the girl he hoped to marry, a young friend he met shortly before his capture). Khadr insists, repeatedly, that he did not actually kill anyone that day, and provides fresh details about the torture he has allegedly endured during his decade in U.S. custody. The conversation also suggests that Khadr has endured some form of sexual abuse, either at the hands of adult jihadists in Afghanistan or fellow detainees at Gitmo.

Yet during other moments of the interview, Khadr sounds exactly like the man Welner described on the witness stand: unrepentant and unconvincing. He vehemently denies his father’s al-Qaeda connections—“I know my father, and I don’t accept anybody saying that he’s a bad person”—and compares bin Laden’s training camps to mere martial arts clubs. He skirts around certain questions (about 9/11, his siblings, his father’s death) and when shown a home video of himself expertly wiring and planting improvised explosive devices, he can barely watch the footage. “What’s the point?” he asked.

Not once does Khadr accept even a shred of responsibility for his lot, consistently shifting the blame to everyone else. Except, of course, the man who dispatched him into battle. “I think he was just a normal dad,” Khadr said. “He was just trying to raise his children the right way.”

 

IN HIS PRIVATE practice, Michael Welner specializes in violent patients who don’t respond very well to other treatments. In court, he has consulted on some of the biggest criminal cases in the United States, from the abduction of Elizabeth Smart to the trial of Andrea Yates, the Houston mother who drowned her five children in a bathtub (and was declared insane). Welner is most renowned for developing the “Depravity Scale,” a research project aimed at quantifying evil.

“Well, nice to meet you,” he told Khadr, settling into his chair.

“Me too,” Khadr said.

A lean man with dark hair and a deep voice, Welner explained how he’d been poring through the case file, and had a lot of questions to ask. “You’ve been in the system for a while,” he said.

“Yeah,” Khadr answered. “I bet you’ve had a lot of reading to do.”

Canadians, of course, are already well acquainted with the file. Born in Scarborough, Ont., on Sept. 19, 1986, Omar is the fourth son of Ahmed Said Khadr, an Egyptian immigrant who moved to Canada to study engineering before pledging his allegiance to Osama bin Laden. The Khadr patriarch first made headlines back in the mid-1990s, when Pakistani authorities arrested him in connection with a deadly embassy bombing in Islamabad. He was set free a few months later—after prime minister Jean Chrétien, in Pakistan for a state visit, personally broached his case with the late Benazir Bhutto. (Chrétien also squeezed in a quick meeting with the Khadr clan, including eight-year-old Omar.)

The family did return to Canada, but very briefly. By 1997, they were in Afghanistan, living in the same compound as bin Laden and his wives. A “charity” worker who ran orphanages, Ahmed Khadr spent much more of his energy funnelling cash to al-Qaeda training camps—the same ones where his sons learned to fire Kalashnikovs. As one senior Mountie later wrote in a sworn affidavit, Khadr “created his own ‘terrorist cell’ and indoctrinated his children from an early age in the values and beliefs of criminal extremists.” When Pakistani forces finally tracked him down (in 2003, a year after Omar’s capture), Ahmed was eulogized as a “holy warrior” and “founding member” of al-Qaeda.

His kids, for better or worse, are the remnants of his legacy. His beloved Omar—shot, shackled, and charged with murder after a deadly firefight with U.S. special forces—has spent a decade of his life locked inside Guantánamo. Kareem, another son, is confined to a wheelchair, shot and paralyzed in the same raid that killed dad. Abdullah, the eldest son, was wanted by the F.B.I. on weapons smuggling charges, while Zaynab, the eldest sister, has been the target of her own RCMP search warrant. (In media interviews, Zaynab has also glorified suicide bombers, rationalized terrorism, and wished she had “the guts” to die a martyr. When bin Laden was killed last year, she mourned his death on her Facebook page, asking Allah to “give us the sabre and the strength to carry on the fight.”)

It was another Khadr sibling, Abdurahman, who first admitted the truth about his upbringing, telling a reporter that his was “an al-Qaeda family” and that his dad repeatedly urged him to become a suicide bomber.

Except Omar, the entire family—all Canadian citizens—is back in Toronto.

“I am not going to mislead you into thinking I am here to help you,” Welner told Omar. “But I am here to tell you that I do take what I do seriously, and what’s most important to me is that I be fair and accurate.”

“That’s the only thing I ask for,” he said.

As Welner listened, Khadr explained how he only lived in Toronto for two years of his life: first grade and fourth grade. He spent the rest of his childhood in Pakistan, dropping out of school, like his older brothers, after the eighth grade. (“It’s like a cursed grade,” he said.) Fluent in four languages (Arabic, English, Pashto and Farsi), Khadr said he translated for his father as he travelled through war-torn Afghanistan, ostensibly to check on his orphanages. Often, his dad would lecture the family about how lucky they were. “My father said: ‘You know, you have to be thankful, you know. You have your parents. These poor kids don’t have their parents.’ ”

Even from his prison cell, Khadr is well aware of the overwhelming publicity his case has generated. He has even watched some of the documentaries, including the footage of Abdurahman revealing the family secret. “As he says about himself, he’s the black sheep,” Khadr told Welner, when asked about his older brother. “He has a very tender heart, but he’s very, very stubborn. He likes to brag about himself. He doesn’t like to be bound by anything . . . That’s why, you know, he had a lot of problems with my dad. You know, he just likes to do whatever he wants to do.”

“How did your father respond to that?” Welner asked.

“In different ways, you know? Hit him sometimes, punch him sometimes, talk to him sometimes. Just like a normal father.” (As for Abdurahman’s suicide bomber story, Omar insisted it’s “not even true.”)

One by one, Welner asked about each of his siblings.

Zaynab? She was like a second mother, Khadr said, someone he shares a “very, very close” bond with. “There is nothing I can say poorly about my sister,” he explained, adding later: “She does what she believes, and she says what she believes. She’s very confident in what she believes.”

Abdullah? He was the “sensible” one “who would not break any rules.” At the time of their interview, Abdullah was in a Toronto jail, fighting extradition to the U.S. on charges that he provided weapons to be used against coalition troops in Afghanistan. “I think he’s being locked up unfairly,” Omar said. “I don’t believe he did anything because I know my brother.” (An Ontario judge later refused to approve Abdullah’s extradition, citing the “gross misconduct” of U.S. officials.)

Kareem? “From what I know,” Omar said, “he was with my dad when my dad died, and he was trying to run away and he got shot from the back.”

“What are your thoughts and your feelings about that?” Welner asked.

“I try not to think about it,” Khadr answered. “When I start thinking about it, I get sad and I get—bad memories come to me, so I just try not to remember it.”

Welner was frank. He told Khadr that as far as he understood, his father was an al-Qaeda leader killed alongside fellow terrorists, and that his little brother, just 14 at the time, was at his side. (After returning to Canada, Kareem himself said he dreamed of dying a martyr, obsessed by the 72 virgins awaiting him in heaven.) Omar, though, was defiant, demanding to know the source of Welner’s information. Over and over, he defended his dad. “I can say he’s not an al-Qaeda, and I can base my beliefs on actual facts,” he said. “I was living with my father, and I saw him.”

Welner continued to probe. “Were you surprised when your father passed away?”

“I was sad,” Khadr answered.

“Were you surprised?” he asked again.

“What do you mean by surprised?”

“Surprised. Were you shocked?”

“I was very sad.”

Welner pressed harder. “You didn’t answer the question.”

“I don’t know,” Khadr said. “I was very sad, that’s all I can answer.”

In fact, Khadr said he hasn’t thought about his dad “for longer than 10 seconds” since the day he heard about his death.

“Not one time at all?” Welner asked.

“Not one time.”

“Does that surprise you?”

“It’s better for me,” Khadr said.

“Because?”

“Because it brings lots of sadness. And being in a place like this, you know, trying to decrease the amount of sadness and pressure you have on yourself.”

“Do you think your father would be proud of you if he were alive?” Welner continued.

“I don’t think I did anything that he would have told me not to do,” Khadr said.

“So, the answer is yes?”

“I hope so.”

 

OMAR KHADR WAS 14 years old when he last stepped foot on Canadian soil. By his own estimation, he landed in Toronto in February 2001 and spent the next few months catching up with relatives. One uncle took him to a baseball game. Another brought him to the zoo. He headed back to Afghanistan that summer, just weeks before the Sept. 11 attacks.

“Do you watch the news?” Welner asked.

“Not too much.”

“What does ‘not too much’ mean?”

“Well, I used to listen to the news, but there is too much tragedy,” Khadr said. (He prefers watching sports networks.)

“What do you think are the biggest problems in the Muslim world?”

“I think the biggest problem in the Muslim world is they’re not being good Muslims,” Khadr replied.

“Can you help me understand that better?” Welner asked.

“Well, I relate to the Prophet, right? And there’s nobody that—in the Islamic history—there is nobody who had a better relationship with the Jews and Christians than the Prophet or with, you know, un-Muslim people . . . We are supposed to be like him, but people are not like him.”

“What can Muslims do differently to change that?”

“I’m sure there’s lots of things that can change, but I don’t know.”

“What do you think of 9/11?” Welner asked.

“It was a tragedy,” Khadr replied.

“What made it tragic?”

“The killing of innocents is tragic.”

“Do you think that the United States deserved it?”

“That’s not up to me to say, but as I told you, I don’t believe in killing innocent people.”

“Well, do you have an opinion?”

“No innocent person deserves to die or be killed,” Khadr said. “That’s all I’m going to say. Americans, Muslims, Jewish, Mormons, whatever; human soul is sacred and each that must be protected and not abused. So for me, a human soul is a human soul, regardless of its religion, of its country. They’re all protected.”

“What do you think it would be like for you, as a devout Muslim, living in Canada?” Welner asked, a few minutes later.

“I’d practise my religion, and everybody can practise his own religion,” Khadr answered.

“Do you feel that it’s easy to practise your religion in a devout way there?”

“Well, I hope nobody would tell me not to practise my religion, but I think I have confidence that Canada is not going to try to harm me if my religion—”

Welner cut him off. He had read some of the letters Khadr received from his family, and how “they’re very offended by some of the things that they see” in Canada. “Of course, there’s freedom of religion there,” Welner said. “But how is it going to be for you in an environment where people may be doing things that are just offensive to you?”

“Well, I think you’ve come to know that I am okay around anybody,” Khadr answered. “And I can live with anybody, you know? If you’re not going to harm me personally, then you can do whatever you want to . . . Everybody has the right to do whatever he wants to do, as long as it’s not going to harm me.”

As they continued talking, Khadr conceded that his family has had difficulty “getting blended into the community.”

“Do you think that’s possible?” Welner asked.

“For them to blend?” Khadr replied.

“Yeah, or do you think that things are sort of as they are, and that next time somebody gets arrested for an al-Qaeda plot, it’s just going to blow back up to the community and make it that much more difficult for them to get integrated?”

“Unfortunately, that’s what’s probably going to happen,” Khadr said. “One of my hopes is, like, people can get over this connecting anything terrorist with Muslims. Like, like, right now, anything that has anything to do with terrorists, they always look to Muslims . . . So I wish that, you know, that people would get over this, like, paranoia of Muslims, you know, that they’re trying to put every blame on them, you know?”

“Do you understand why people in the United States and Canada make an association between terrorism and Muslims?”

“I understand, yes,” Khadr replied. But people need to be more “open-minded,” he said. “You know, a million Muslims can do something bad, but it doesn’t mean that this million and one person is bad, too. We have to reach that mentality to consider ourselves modernized people and civilized people.”

 

IN THE SUMMER OF 2008—six years after the firefight, and still in prison—Omar Khadr signed his name to a nine-page affidavit that outlines, in appalling detail, the alleged torture he has suffered at the hands of his American jailers. Barking dogs. A bag over his head, wrapped tightly around his neck. “Extremely bright lights” aimed at his badly wounded eyes. “Several times,” he wrote, “the soldiers tied my hands above my head to the door frame or chained them to the ceiling and made me stand like that for hours at a time.” One guard, he said, “farted in my face.”

Khadr was flown from Bagram, Afghanistan, to Guantánamo Bay in October 2002, barely a month after his 16th birthday. “I did not want to expose myself to any more harm, so I always just told interrogators what I thought they wanted to hear,” he wrote. Still, Khadr claims, the torture continued. Isolation. Sleep deprivation. No Koran in his cell. According to the affidavit, one interrogator spit in his face, pulled his hair, and threatened to send in another associate—“Soldier Number 9”—to rape him. “The interrogator told me, ‘Your life is in my hands.’ ”

During the interview, Welner asked Khadr to talk about the torture, to share his experiences in his own words. “Can my affidavit do these things?” Khadr replied.

“No,” Welner answered. “I’ve read it.”

“See, because I don’t like going through these bad memories.”

“I understand,” he said. “But I’m a psychiatrist, and a psychiatrist who doesn’t go through this with you is unprofessional.”

“Even if it causes your patient harm and pain?” Khadr asked.

Again, he told Welner to review the court document (“I think it’s better to read from the affidavit; I really do”), but as the first day of their interview wound down, Khadr did open up about some of the torture. “They tried lots of methods on me,” he said. “They’d try one thing, then they’d try something else, and then they’d try something else.”

Once, he said, guards locked him in a cell where “you can’t see the sun” and “you had to scream to actually hear anyone.” Another time, he was used as a “human mop” to clean up his own urine. Repeatedly, Khadr said, guards short-shackled him to the floor—arms tied behind his legs—and left him there. When his father died, interrogators showed him his photo “just to hurt me.”

“They brought you a picture of him dead?” Welner asked.

“Yes,” Khadr answered. “They were, like, trying to make fun of me: ‘Oh, you are crying. Oh, your eyes are teary.’ And they said: ‘Oh, your father was a big terrorist and we caught him.’ ”

“What was your reaction to that?”

“I didn’t answer them.”

“How did it affect you?”

“It was very painful, but I detached myself.”

Welner continued to ask Khadr how the torture has impacted him. “I really don’t know how to put it in words,” he said. “I was tortured. This is the only way I can explain it.” He grew so upset by the questions that he asked to change the topic.

They talked about the Canadian government. (“I was expecting them and my father were going to help me,” Khadr said.) About his family saying they are “proud” of him. (“They’re being misled.”) About being influenced by older detainees. (“In the beginning they were successful,” he said. “Right now nobody can influence me to do anything.”)

Welner asked if other prisoners ever threatened him for talking to interrogators. “I always felt very unsafe,” Khadr answered.

“Can you help me understand that?”

Khadr hesitated. “I don’t like to talk about this certain subject.”

“Well, that’s a good way to get me interested in it,” Welner said.

“I know, but—”

“Do you understand why I need to know that?”

“Yeah,” Khadr answered. “The defence doctors, they tried to get me to talk about this. It’s just, I don’t want to talk about this specific subject.”

“About feeling unsafe from other detainees?”

“In a specific way,” Khadr said.

“You mean about sexual assault?”

“Let’s talk about another subject.”

Welner kept pressing. “This is something I need to understand,” he said.

“I think I prefer to move over this certain subject,” Khadr repeated.

“Do you still feel unsafe?”

“I will always feel unsafe,” he said.

“I know that sexual conduct happens here,” Welner said. “It happens in every custodial environment.”

“Can we change the subject please?”

Again, Welner persisted. “Do you understand why we all as doctors would be curious to know about that? Is there anything that we can do to make you safer here?”

“Get me out of this place,” Khadr replied.

 

BEHIND BARS, Omar Khadr has memorized every verse of the Koran. (“I had nothing else to do,” he told Welner.) He has immersed himself in other literature, too, from Harry Potter to Nelson Mandela’s Long Walk to Freedom to steamy Danielle Steele novels. He has also read Ishmael Beah’s A Long Way Gone, the story of a 13-year-old who was forced into the Sierra Leone army, ordered to kill, but later rehabilitated. “He’s done, like, 10 times worse things than the thing I’m accused of doing,” Khadr said. “But he was given a chance in life to prove himself, and I was not.”

According to military prosecutors—and the agreed statement of facts Omar signed—Ahmed Khadr dispatched his 15-year-old son in June 2002 to serve as a “translator” for a militant cell operating near Khost, Afghanistan. While there, Khadr received “one-on-one private terrorist training” in the use of rocket-propelled grenades, assault rifles and pistols. A home video—recovered from the rubble of the compound after Khadr’s capture—shows the smiling teenager wiring improvised explosive devices and helping to plant them under the cover of darkness.

On June 16, 2010, the second day of their interview, Welner brought along a copy of the video. “Can I just ask what’s the point of watching this thing?” Khadr asked.

“Because I think it’s something that’s important,” Welner replied.

“No, no, but what does it have to do with me?” Khadr said.

“Because you’re in it,” Welner said. “What’s it like to watch it?”

“I don’t like to watch it,” Khadr said. “I believe that people are trying to hurt me more than I deserve.”

In one scene, Khadr is sitting beside the group’s leader, Abu Laith al-Libi, taping wires. “One of the things that I noticed is that you’re assembling these explosives,” Welner said. “Could you tell me about the whole process of [Laith] teaching you to do this?”

“Well, he didn’t teach me,” Khadr said. “As you can see, it’s only taping wires. I don’t think it needs any teaching.”

“Would you hand these explosive materials to Zaynab?” Welner asked, referring to his sister. “Or would you give her some sort of instruction; perhaps be concerned for her safety, and make sure that she can handle these in a responsible way?”

“Are you trying to be sarcastic?”

“No. I’m trying to be straightforward with you. Are you suggesting to me that he just handed you explosive materials and said: ‘Here, take this,’ with him sitting in the room a few feet away?”

Eventually, Khadr admitted that he had previous experience with explosives. “Please don’t put my sister in anything like this, because this doesn’t have to do anything with my sister or my family,” Khadr said.

Pressed again about the video clip, he asked his own question. “Do you have any experience of al-Qaeda’s people?”

“I don’t know that that answers my question,” Welner said.

“Well, I’m going to get to it,” Khadr said.

“Okay. Well then please answer the question because this is your opportunity to educate me about what I may not understand about your experience there.”

“First thing, al-Qaeda doesn’t care about you—if you’re a kid. If they cared about me, they wouldn’t be putting me in such a position. And I think that’s very obvious you don’t put a kid with explosives if you care about them, right? That’s the first thing.”

“Do you think Abu Laith cared about himself?” Welner asked.

“He had his goals and he wanted to accomplish them,” Khadr said.

“You’re sitting five feet away from him with explosives.”

“Yeah.”

“Even if he doesn’t care about you, do you think he doesn’t care about his own safety?”

“Yeah, he does,” Khadr said, trying to explain the contradiction. “Explosives need a detonator to detonate these explosives. If you don’t have a detonator, then there’s no risk. You can have a whole room full of explosives; if you don’t have a detonator, then it’s safe. So that’s the second point. The third point, I told you, I was a translator for a long time and they were teaching Afghans how to do these things, and translating I’ve learned how to do these things. Make any sense?”

Khadr was still at the Bagram airbase, blind in his left eye and recovering from his wounds, when interrogators first showed him that bomb-making video. (As one interrogator recalled: “He got caught with his hand in the cookie jar.”) When Welner asked about that specific interview, Khadr said he couldn’t remember it. “I was under lots of stress and I was under a lot of medications,” he said.

Welner asked him to describe the stress. “I think you government people like to see me tortured,” Khadr replied. “If not physically, you like to see me tortured.”

“Do you feel that it’s psychological torture to show you this video?” Welner asked.

“Yes.”

“Tell me how that is.”

“It’s painful. I told you, like, four times already.”

“You can’t have it both ways,” Welner said, a few minutes later. “Either you do remember things or you don’t. And if you remember, well then talk to me about what you remember, and that includes whatever you experienced that’s painful to you . . . But if you decide that you want to say that you don’t remember because you’re being cagey and you want to manage the interview—”

“What’s cagey?” Khadr interrupted.

“That you’re being tactical. I’m just asking you questions. Either you remember that period or you don’t.”

“The American government has lost its wing,” Khadr said.

“Pardon?”

“The American government has lost its wing,” he repeated. “Tactics? I’ve been held as a child, and you’re talking about tactics. When do you think I had the chance to learn tactics?

“I was afraid,” Khadr continued. “That’s all I need to tell you.”

“Okay,” Welner said. “When you tell me that you were afraid when this video was shown, can you tell me about what kinds of fears came to mind?”

“I was afraid to be tortured, more than what I was.”

“When you say tortured, what did you expect was going to happen to you once this video [was] shown to you?”

“Rape, abuse, physical torture; everything would come to my mind,” Khadr said.

“So have you been raped prior to that point?” Welner asked.

“I’d been threatened.”

“Okay. And did you expect that once this videotape was shown that you then would be raped afterwards?”

“Anything was possible,” Khadr said.

“Had you been raped in the past?”

“I don’t want to answer that.”

“Because I’m under the impression that you had been sexually assaulted in the past and the reports of the defence mental health experts suggested that you had.”

“I’m not answering this question,” Khadr said, again. “I would rather skip it.’

“You understand, though, why I’m asking the question,” Welner said.

“I understand,” Khadr answered. “That’s why sexual threat is very sensitive to me. I’m not going to go into any more details.”

“Were you sexually abused by Abu Laith?”

“I’m not going to answer this question.”

“Were you sexually abused by anyone in the family?”

“I don’t want to talk about anything of this sexual abuse,” Khadr insisted. “Why don’t we just go to the next subject?”

Welner tried to explain that as a mental health professional, it’s his job to examine “the impact of different things” on his life. “If I or anyone else is getting to know you and doesn’t have a feeling for what happened, then an evaluation is incomplete,” he said. “And that’s why I’m asking the questions.”

“I’m not going to talk about the subject,” Khadr repeated. “You’re a professional, you can make your own conclusions on what you think is true.”

 

FOR YEARS, KHADR’S defenders have pointed the finger at his fanatical father, blaming him for his son’s fate. But Omar himself does not subscribe to that storyline. “I don’t believe that my father sent me knowing that my life was going to be in danger,” he said. “And secondly, I don’t think my father thought that anybody would use his kids and things.”

According to Khadr’s version of events, his family was always translating for Arab friends living in Afghanistan, and Abu Laith’s request for his services was nothing out of the ordinary. “We like to help people in translating because we are privileged with this talent: multi-language,” he said. “So I don’t think that my father thought that they were going to use me in a way that might endanger my life because it never happened in the past.”

There were moments in the interview, very briefly, when Khadr described the events of July 27, 2002. Still facing a trial at the time, he would not specifically discuss the grenade toss that killed Sgt. Speer—and Welner did not ask him about it. But when they did talk about the firefight, Khadr consistently minimized his role. Other people handed him a weapon. Other people told him to stand outside. Other people “started dragging me around” after the bombs started falling.

“I haven’t asked you this directly and so I want to understand it,” Welner said. “How do you feel like you are a victim in this?”

“Well, all the way to the beginning, being used to accomplish other people’s goals; that’s a victim,” Khadr said. “At Bagram, people wanted information and so I was the victim. Right now, in this military commissions, I’m only being charged because I’m the only survivor and there’s a dead body and there have been bad things that happened, and there’s no other survivor to blame but me. So I’m a victim. I’ve been a victim from the beginning.”

“Did you ever brag here about killing an American?” Welner asked.

“No.”

“So anyone who would’ve documented this would be lying?”

“If I said that after a torture, then that’s not reliable,” Khadr replied. “But me saying with my heart that I’m happy because this person is dead? No.”

Near the end of the interview, Welner asked a few more questions about Canada. “It’s a country I can call home,” Khadr said.

“And when you say it’s a country you could call home, what do you mean by that?”

“I can’t say, like, Afghanistan was my home or Pakistan is my home. But I can say Canada is my home. You go back to it.”

“It’s a place you can go?”

“Yes.”

“Okay,” Welner said. “Where would you live in Canada, if you could?”

“Probably in Toronto,” he said. “Obviously, I’m going to live around my family.”

“So you expect to live around your family?”

“I guess,” he said. “It doesn’t mean that I won’t live anywhere else, though. I haven’t thought about it.”

“If you didn’t go to Canada, where would you prefer to live?” Welner continued.

“Anywhere,” said Khadr, still chained to the floor. “Probably I could live anywhere.”

If you could change anything about Canada, Welner continued, what would it be?

“That’s a good question,” Khadr said. “I would enhance their human rights field.”

“How so?”

“To make a law applicable on everybody, and to try not to make any difference between anybody in getting their rights.”

 

THREE WEEKS AFTER meeting Omar Khadr, Michael Welner submitted a 63-page report to military prosecutors. His findings were unequivocal: Khadr is conniving, unrepentant, as radicalized as ever—and a “spoiled celebrity.” Although charming and confident, his answers were often so elusive and so self-serving that they bordered on the ridiculous. “His responses,” Welner wrote in his report, “are such departures from the available record that his ability to carry it off as much as he does is impressive as well.”

As for the torture allegations, Welner wrote: “It is my professional opinion that the affidavit he submitted demonstrates his determination to do and say whatever he believes he must in order to help his case.”

When Khadr pleaded guilty—in exchange for that chance to come to a Canadian jail—Welner was just as blunt on the witness stand: “He has great support from certain sectors of the news media who lend legitimacy to him,” and his star power will have an “instant impact on the scalability of what al-Qaeda and the radical jihadist movement is capable of in Canada.” (Under cross-examination, Welner was attacked for relying, in part, on the research of Nicolai Sennels, a Danish psychologist who has said the Koran is “a criminal book that forces people to do criminal things.” Welner told the court he was unaware of Sennels’ “political” remarks.)

When it was finally his turn to address the court, Khadr portrayed a much different version of himself. He personally apologized to Sgt. Speer’s widow “for the pain I caused you and your family,” and said he reached “a conclusion” in jail. “You’re not going to gain anything with hate,” he said, dressed in a suit and tie instead of his orange prison jumpsuit. “Love and forgiveness are more constructive and will bring people together.” (They didn’t testify, but Khadr has also spent hundreds of hours with two mental health experts retained by his defence team: Stephen Xenakis, a psychiatrist and retired U.S. army brigadier-general; and child psychologist Katherine Porterfield. Both have written glowing letters to Minister Toews, praising Khadr’s “remarkably positive outlook” and his wish to “contribute to the world in a way that brings about religious understanding.”)

By now, federal officials have no doubt watched the secret Welner tape. Technically, Toews still has every authority to deny Khadr’s transfer request, despite the diplomatic note that said Ottawa would be “inclined to favourably consider” it. The law that governs the minister’s decision (the International Transfer of Offenders Act) specifically states that an application can be refused on the grounds that the offender is likely to “endanger public safety” or “commit a terrorism offence.” A person who “left or remained outside Canada with the intention of abandoning Canada as their place of permanent residence” can also be refused. In Khadr’s case, there’s an argument to be made for all three.

But it’s not that simple, of course. When it comes to the Khadrs, nothing ever is. The real question facing Toews actually has nothing to do with whether Omar should be allowed to return to the country of his birth. He will come home, at some point, like all Canadians can. The real question is this: which Khadr do we want to welcome back? The one who serves the rest of his sentence in Cuba, only to fly home a completely free man in six more years? Or the one who can be eased into our prison system, and accountable to the parole laws that go with it?

If Omar Khadr is truly a remorseless threat—a jihadist rock star bent on revenge—which option best protects his fellow citizens?

For many of those citizens, another question must also be answered: when is enough enough? Despite everything he has done—and everything his family stands for—Khadr has spent more than 10 years inside a place that is almost as abhorrent. Willing terrorist or exploited child, he was still a 15-year-old kid thrown into a literal black hole. He was locked up for more than two years before he even talked to a lawyer.

A few days ago, Khadr turned 26—his 11th birthday behind U.S. bars. During that 2010 interview with Welner, he said all he wants is “a chance of life, of true life.” A chance to prove people wrong. A chance to go to school and become a doctor. A chance to marry. “I don’t know if I’m going to find somebody who’s going to understand what I’ve been through,” he conceded. “But it’s always a dream that somebody will understand.”

Canadians are still struggling to understand, too. After so many years, and so many contradictory descriptions, the truth about Omar Khadr remains a moving target. Toews demanded to see the Welner tape, hoping it would offer some fresh insights into the man nobody really knows. If anything, though, it will only add more fuel to the endless debate.

Who is the real Omar Khadr? Helpless child soldier? Unrepentant killer? As always, it depends on which snippets of the evidence you’re willing to ignore.




Browse

The secret Omar Khadr file

  1. If this man is ever normal again after Gitmo, it’ll be a miracle

  2. GET HIM HOME! I fully trust that as a country and society we can deal with issues surrounding Omar Khadr. He deserves a chance in life, like everyone of us.

    • NO!! This is a terrorist who ALREADY received a pardon (thank you Cretien). Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.
      This family has NO Canadian values. I hope he rots in Gitmo.

      • Yes, Chretien pardoned an 8 yr boy! How about you go back and re-read that section of the article again.
        Leaving him to “rot in Gitmo” will prove that WE have no Canadian values.

        • If giving a terrorist a second chance at mass killing is a Canadian value,
          I for one will pass on the Canadian values.

          This person and his whole family are only Canadians for the security of our passport and free medical after getting shot up over sea’s.

          Whe need more people like him in our country like the world needs more Brevik’s, both are extremists with a goal of wiping out the other.

          And if all souls are so precious what was all the IED’s meant for?
          A really good fireworks show by the side of the road????

          Get your head out of your posterior and think for yourself.

          • Omar is a Canadian citizen because he was born here. He was also a CHILD at the time. Get your head out of Harpers ass…

          • So we should just smile and accept a Canadian born terrorist back into the country??? He is about as Canadian as all the Lebanese Canadians of convenience who only come here when the crap hits the fan in the sunny middle east.

            Does the fact that he is Canadian make him less of a danger, from the transcripts of the interviews he accept no blame and sees nothing wrong with how his DADDY raised him, or how Osama Bin Laden helped train him in weapons and bomb making. So maybe you should extract your head from Mulclair’s posterior. He might need it soon when he get’s it handed to him:)

            And read the UN defintion of a child soldier at least once and you will find that he does not fit it.

          • Get yours out of your own.

          • I took a pass on the Trudeaupian brainwashing that passes for “Canadian” values long ago – our moral cowardice and zeal to blame the victim are a national shame and international laughingstock – witness Luka Magnotta’s very real wish to be returned to Canada for trial after being caught in Germany.

            We have had 4 decades of this lunatic state-sponsored propaganda now (at least until Harper; the national media still generate it daily though) and millions of you are incapable of rational, critical, truly independent thought any more. The Zombie Apocalypse? It’s already here in Canada.

      • A pardon? Did he burp in the presence of the petit gar?

        The father was locked up not the 8-year-old.

  3. What do you even say anymore?
    Taking a 16 year old traumatized in various ways throughout his young life by his parents and those they allowed to abuse him, and then multiplying that abuse by a thousand for another decade?
    We might as well admit we’re no better than those we criticize.

    • 15…..not 16

      • YOU may not be any better, but many of us are. Deal with it.

  4. The biases in this article are more subtle than in a “Ezra Levant
    Rant” but in some ways that makes them more insidious and dangerous in
    their ability to sway the all-important demographic: centrist, under-informed
    Canadians who want to be compassionate but not quite as much as they want to be
    safe.

    Consider first the source of the leak. The access to the
    complete unredacted tapes and files had to come from the Harper government.
    They are the only ones (other than the US government) who have access to this
    material. What terms do you suppose Mr. Friscolanti had to agree to in order to
    secure this exclusive? I am sure he still considers his journalistic integrity
    intact but I also am sure there were terms and conditions attached to this
    exclusive that were in keeping with the Harper government’s goals.

    For starters, there is the classic “medic”
    reference – referring to Delta Force Sgt. Christopher Speer as a medic. There
    are only two reasons for a detailed article to include such a reference:
    journalistic incompetence OR it was a prerequisite in exchange for access to the
    video. This is a factual inaccuracy that leads the reader down the “Omar
    Khadr killed Hawkeye Pearce from MASH” path and you know that Friscolanti
    did more than enough research for a feature like this to be aware of the
    controversy around the use of this term. He would also know that “medic” is a
    Levant/Toews term that appears nowhere in the Stipulation of Facts that he
    references in the very next sentence. If
    the US government, when writing the Stipulation of Facts for Omar to sign as
    part of his plea, did not think they could credibly refer to Sgt. Speer as a
    medic, why is the Canadian media so lazily picking up on this Conservative mis-representation?

    Another critical bias is the very soft touch he uses when he
    addresses the destruction of Welner’s credibility that occurred in the GTMO
    courtroom during Omar’s sentencing hearing and in subsequent media reports. He
    alludes to it briefly but gives Welner the final word on Welner. The article
    presents Welner as a “fair and accurate” (using Welner’s self-assigned
    adjectives) but as fully informed readers we can see how Welner has already
    written his “full of rage” and “highly dangerous”
    assessment long before his interview with Khadr. He does his college-trained best to guide
    this Grade 8 educated young man down dark alleys of self-incrimination. It is
    quite miraculous just how little success Welner has – he really has to stretch
    things thinly to justify his pre-determined conclusions. Where is the rage? Where is this imminent danger?

    Another interesting thing that is not discussed by Mr.
    Friscolanti is the fact that this entire interview could not even have happened
    if it were not for the special rules of the US Military Tribunals. Omar Khadr
    was subjected to 8 hours of intensive questioning that formed the primary basis
    for his sentencing – all without the presence of a defense attorney to advise him.
    The Maclean’s reader is left to sit comfortably in their cozy Canadian
    jurisdiction (thankfully still the home of concepts like “innocent until
    proven guilty” and “habeus corpus”) where they can pretend that
    Omar Khadr had human rights in this process.
    How did we completely disengage from the discussion of these critical
    background elements that make Omar Khadr’s case unique in Canadian history?

    With the spectrum of bias anchored so heavily on one end by the
    likes of Ezra Levant, it is hard to assess Mr. Friscolanti too harshly, but I
    suspect that history will judge him and many others in the media relatively
    severely for facilitating the gradual movement of the discussion away from
    critical truths that go to the heart of our Canadian value system. We are the
    frog and the water in which we swim is slowly being brought to a boil…

    At the end of the day, my belief is that this article will
    probably reassure more Canadians than it will frighten and for that reason, I
    will circulate it and encourage others to read it. Omar Khadr is his own best
    character reference – one really has to wonder how Levant & Co. can harp on
    about Omar being “unrepentant Jihadist” when throughout his time with
    Welner, Omar Khadr is consistently preaching inter-faith tolerance and the
    sanctity of every human life. We should all feel sorry for men like Welner and
    Levant – imagine how horrible it must be to see the world through their eyes…
    I suspect that is what Omar Khadr would say.

    • He is an Islamist not a white, Christian guy who joined the Waffen-SS to serve Hitler. We let that guy go after ten years. We all recognize that American soldiers lives are more valuable than Canadian lives.

      Khadr killed one man within throwing range. Major Harry Schmidt killed four of us, wounded eight and was given a reprimand for his heroism. He dropped his bomb, rolling in from 14,000 feet in violation of an order from his AWACS controller.

    • What crap. You are what is wrong with Canada today.

      • Inarticulate people often use swear words and name-calling in their posts.

        • …and prissy cowards often criticize people on the basis of their vocabulary instead of addressing their points.

          • …and fools like you think he made a point when all Howard did was flick the bird.

    • Here’s the Qur’an on jihad, according to one scholar:
      “The Qur’anic concept of jihad refers to exerting efforts, in the form of struggle against or resistance to something, for the sake of Allah. This effort can be fighting back armed aggression, but can also be resisting evil drives and desires in one’s self. Even donating money to the needy is a form of jihad, as it involves struggling against one’s selfishness and inner desire to keep one’s money for one’s own pleasures. Armed jihad…is a response to armed aggression. Once the aggression has ceased, armed jihad comes to an end.
      Causes of peaceful jihad…are always existent, which is why this form of jihad is permanent. One major form of peaceful jihad is the war of the Muslim against his “nafs,” an Arabic term that may be translated as the “lower self,” and which refers to the individual’s inferior drives and evil motives. This most dangerous enemy never disappears, hence this war knows no end.”
      So Omar Khadr may well be an unrepentant jihadist, in the sense of one who wants to better himself. His responses in the interview indicate this.
      The U.S. and Canadian governments’ attempts to use Khadr to further their own questionable ends have failed. Now, amoral, shameless hacks like Ezra Levant, knowing that Canadians are unfamiliar with the term, are using it to drum up fear of Khadr in the interests of the Islamaphobia industry that Levant profits from.

    • Fool.

  5. There is nothing in the interview above to support Michael Welner’s findings that “Khadr is conniving, unrepentant, as radicalized as ever—and a “spoiled celebrity.” On the contrary, Michael Welner is adept at using his position of power in the interview to inflate his own ego.

    • Welner isn’t conniving or radicalized or anything like that.

  6. The Maclean’s article is a dishonest smear job.
    Please editors, stop your yellow journalism!

    • Lefties need the muslin terrorists to do the dirty job since they are too coward to do the same. That’s why leftists and terrorists are always in bed together.

  7. Khadr did not admit to “being obsessed with killing Americans wherever they can be found”. See the “stipulation of facts”, the confession document Khadr signed for the purpose of the plea bargain.
    http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/40166977?access_key=key-1qsq04reeonzmw6z4059

    It’s also not clear to me why the reporter seems to accept without question the controversial charges against Khadr. He was a 15 year old who joined a war obviously based on the beliefs of his father and other adults among whom he was raised. His actions in the war, even assuming the charges against him were valid, were far more like normal acts of war than anything else. The US used a questionable interpretation of a law passed long after he was captured to justify characterizing these actions as “war crimes, murder and terrorism”.

    Has this reporter ever actually read the “child soldier law”? Does he have any idea that it was intended to protect people exactly like Khadr? Is he aware that Harper lied to public about Khadr not being qualified under this law, even based on the plain language of the law? Is he aware that the UN representative of the “child soldier” program wrote to the military commission to confirm that Khadr was a “classic” example, and that his prosecution was contrary to decades of international practice and undermined the treaty, one adopted into both US and Canadian law? Does he know that even the military judge didn’t dispute that fact? He made it clear that this prosecution wasn’t his decision, and that Khadr was charged under the Military Commissions Act, passed after the US adopted the “child soldier law”, and therefore taking precedence, and long after Khadr was captured. Charging people under a law that didn’t exist at the time of their offense is justified by the dubious claim that it somehow represents pre-existing law, without specifying what law.

    It’s not possible for anybody to say what Khadr would do if released. The Canadian government should live up to its agreement that was used by the US to finally convince Khadr to plead guilty and give up appeal rights, as they have been trying to do for years. The Canadian government should accept the US decision to transfer Khadr to a Canadian jail. It should have Khadr assessed by credible and objective people and consult with US military and security officials. Relying on contradictory reports of psychiatrists hired for the Prosecution and Defense makes no sense. The government is obviously stalling for political reasons having nothing to do with genuine concerns about security.

  8. Wow! This wasn’t a 26 year old man who committed a crime in our backyard. This was a 15 year old boy doing what his father had expected of him in countries that were at war of some sort. Not only that he was fighting for his own life, at that moment in his life. Sheesh, wouldn’t anyone else do the same. Everyone, take yourselves back prior to Sept.11.2001. I would accept Omar into my home at any time. He deserves as much of a chance of a normal life as any other Canadian does. Omar should not be used as a political puppet!

  9. As a serving member in the military I find this as a slap in the face that the Government would allow him back in our country.

    • So you won’t defend freedom to the death? Or only freedoms that you approve. As a serving member of the military you are not allowed to have public opinions. Your military status is simply not relevant in this context (and if you feel slighted, you are more perceptive than I expected).

      This is the Internet, anyone can claim to be anything.

      All right! Who wants to go marching up and down the square with Sergeant-Major!

  10. One may not love the Khadr family, but the only way to honour international law and basic human rights is to return Omar to Canada, and allow him the chance to regain his existence as a free human being. And secondly, one has to apply some critical thinking to the acceptance by American authorities of the use of torture, and their seeming abandonment of the requirement of any kind of real evidence, let alone proof, of guilt, before subjecting human beings to years of incarceration and torture. Perhaps the decline of American has more to do with its abandonment of basic human rights than its over-generous entitlements for its citizens.

  11. I sympathize with him in that he has been manipulated since childhood. However, I don’t believe he can change at this point in his life to where he no longer poses a danger to others. Let him do his time in prison, in either Canada or else where and then ship him off to any country that will accept him…other than Canada.

  12. The POS should be hanged for treason and the rest of his demon-spawn family should be sent back the the third-world cesspool they crawled out of.

  13. Why is Omar Khadr being so severely punished for a coerced admission of killing one soldier? Canada allowed the release of a Waffen-SS Brigadier General who was convicted of killing forty-one (41) surrendering Canadian soldiers on June 7 and 8, 1944 ? Kurt Meyer was captured by the US Army on Sept 6, 1944 and was released from a British Army prison in Werl, Germany on Sept 7, 1954. He spent five years in Dorchester pennitentiary.

    Meyer was given a fair trial by a court martial board of five Canadian Army general officers and was sentenced to death. His sentence was commuted to life in prison by Canadian Major-General Christopher Vokes.

    After his release Meyer worked as a distributor for a brewery and supplied beer to the messes of the Canadian Army at Soest, Germany. He died a free man in 1961.

  14. This would have all be a lot better if he were just killed in battle, he is a p.o.s and does not deserve to be free.

  15. Undoubtedly this child soldier has been used and abused by the biggest military machine in history. The US knew what it wanted and pressed til it got it. The loud mouthed Mp who has accused Omar as a terrorist uses inflammatory language whenever he tries to get his own way. Eg., all who disagreed with him in matter of allowing police access to the public’s computers were accused by him of siding with the pornogrifers. Wild accu sations made by Vic Toews show a man who has to be in the middle of a whirlwind!!! He has to be important. Omar had nooo chance at a fair trial in US and the cons. who are presently in gov. here are people with no moral standing, pretend to be Christian. I do not know where they get their example . Certainly not from Jesus Christ. I am ashamed to be Canadian when matters as humane and deeply spiritual as the repatriation of this CHILD SOLDIER are ignored by the current gov. { the same as Pharasees in the time of Christ.} Disgusting how people can hide behind Christian principle for their own selfish purposes.

  16. Ok He is back. He is a Canadian citizen Now lets give him a trial, and then hang him for treason.It is still a capitol offence.Those IED’s he is so proud of making could just as easily killed Canadian Troops. Oh but wait. You people want to give him 10 mil., You are pathetic. You are what is wrong with our country today. So very sad.

    • There is no death penalty for treason. The Criminal code specifies life in prison. Section 46(2)(a) of the code states, “Every one commits treason who, in Canada, uses force or violence for the purposes of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province.” There is no way Khadr’s activities could be construed as an attempt to overthrow the Canadian government. In the broader definition, treason is defined as aiding an enemy at war with Canada. But Khadr wasn’t fighting off a Canadian attack. He could have been making IEDs to kill Americans. Your assertions are utterly groundless and based on ignorance. You use the words “you people.” Do you mean people who actually have an education and some kind of critical faculties?

  17. What would you say the central message being conveyed in this article would be?

  18. This entire affair is disgusting. a blight upon this nation. A cowardly, peeping tom pursuit of lurid imaginary bogeymen, squeezing droplets of gratification from morsels and tidbits of gossip.
    And it lays at the feet of Stephen Harper. May it be imprinted on his gravestone.

  19. I think Mr Friscolanti did a good job of reporting the content of the long interrogation by this Welner guy. I cannot bring myself to refer to him as “Dr”. His whole “depravity scale” and “objective measure of evil” enterprise brings us closer to the Inquisition than to modern psychiatry, as R. Betty points out.
    At least the paper lets the reader grasp the extent of the damage done to a young boy, at all stages of his life. I don’t get the impression that the author tries to paint young (and mature) Khadr as the evil person that Welner pretends to have met, but I am taken aback by his conclusion:”Who is the real Omar Khadr? Helpless child soldier? Unrepentant killer? As always, it depends on which snippets of the evidence you’re willing to ignore.”
    What “snippet of evidence” exactly are we talking about? Strangely enough I can’t find anything that would lead me to think that we are face to face with a depraved homicidal and unrepentant killer. This is, according to Maclean’s, a “revealing interview”, yet the author himself can’t even draws his own conclusion and instead tries to convince us that there is ample evidence for both side of the argument. For God’s sake, Omar Khadr is no Anders Behring Breivik, smiling one minute and executing the Nazi salute the other, oblivious to the pain he has inflicted on so many. Yet even this madman had a fair trial. Why not call it as it is? A miscarriage of justice, at all levels, by the most advanced country in the world.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *