Are members of organized religions inherently more generous?

Why faith may explain why Abbotsford, B.C., is Canada’s most generous city

The value of giving in the valley

Simon Hayter

When the management team of Vancouver’s Canuck Place children’s hospice met a few years back to consider a fundraising campaign to build a facility to meet the growing needs of the Fraser Valley, they were advised it was folly to consider a multi-million-dollar capital project in the teeth of a recession, says Filomena Nalewajek, CEO of Canuck Place.

She admits the board wavered before pressing ahead last year after making one key decision: they would locate the hospice in Abbotsford. “We did our homework and recognized we were going into a community that was different,” she says. “We just didn’t know how different.” A year later, the campaign is already “a stone’s throw” from hitting its $13-million target, says Nalewajek. “It is because of that community. It is unbelievable. It is unprecedented, especially in this economic climate.”

For nine years in a row, the tax filers of Abbotsford-Mission have given the largest per-capita charitable donations in Canada, Statistics Canada reported in December. Overall, Canadians gave $8.3 billion in 2010 to charities, based on income tax returns. The median Canadian donation was $260 per person, meaning half of donors gave more and half gave less. In Abbotsford and neighbouring Mission, however, the median donation was $610, which is impressive considering the median income is a modest $46,490. Calgary was next highest among metropolitan areas with a median donation of $380—but with a median annual income some $20,000 higher.

Ask observers why the Abbotsford area is so uncommonly generous, and invariably they note it is the heart of the Bible belt of B.C. There are about 90 churches in Abbotsford alone, including some of the largest in the country. As well, the community benefits from its vibrant, long-established Sikh, Muslim and Jewish communities. “There’s a faith base and there’s multiculturalism, people coming from abroad and knowing what it’s like to not have a lot to start off with,” says Hugh Franklin, a supervisor at the Abbotsford Food Bank and Christmas Bureau.

However, Dave Murray, the food bank director, questions how much of the donations go to church overheads and salaries. As well, Abbotsford attracts like-minded organizations, including a couple of Bible colleges, the provincial headquarters for the Mennonite Central Committee, which conducts relief and missionary work around the globe, and the national office of American fundamentalist preacher Charles R. Swindoll, among others, he notes. Still, he says there’s no denying faith-based institutions instill a culture of giving, though this year he frets that donations to the food bank are lagging by 20 per cent. “Eighty per cent of our budget comes in December-January, so it’s pretty stressful.”

Are members of organized religions inherently more generous? The short answer seems to be yes, but the devil is in the details. “Religious people do tend to give more than non-religious people,” says Michael Wilkinson, a sociologist specializing in religion at Trinity Western University in the Fraser Valley. This generosity is at the foundation of many faiths, he says. “It’s part of their value system. They’re motivated to give; they believe they’re doing something that’s important for the community. They believe they are involved in something bigger than themselves.”

When charities seek to learn what motivates donors, they often turn to Cygnus Applied Research, a Hamilton-based company that tracks donor intentions and charitable trends in the U.S. and Canada. Its annual survey of some 22,000 donors on both sides of the border confirms religious conviction has a major impact on philanthropy, says company president Penelope Burk. “It’s not just giving to one’s own faith,” she says. “Actively religious donors are more likely to give to, stay loyal to and give at a higher level to other causes.” Its survey of some 4,100 Canadians who regularly give to charity found the average donation in 2010 for those professing no religion was $2,345. Those who identified as “spiritual” gave an average $2,889. Those who called themselves “actively religious”—about one donor in five—gave an average $7,178.

Perhaps those numbers help explain why Quebecers—in what is considered Canada’s most secular province—give the least to charity. The median donation claimed by tax filers there was just $130.

Nationally, donations climbed by 6.5 per cent after a recessionary 2009, but Burk warns charities face a looming problem. Her surveys find the number of religious young people is falling, and with it the level of donations. The tiny minority of those under 35 who define themselves as religious gave over five times more generously than others their age, she says. As the influence of religion wanes among younger people (even in Abbotsford the average age of donors was 52), she wonders what is needed to instill a higher level of philanthropy: “I don’t know what the answer to that question is.”




Browse

Are members of organized religions inherently more generous?

  1. Giving to greenpeace is not considered giving to charity by Revenue Canada.
    Giving to the Jehova’s Witness’ church that you’re a member of is.

    I think that’s really all that needs to be said about those statistics.

    • Neither of them count as charities as far as I’m concerned, but rather causes.
       
      However even if you subtract religious proselytization and institutions from the equation, the religious still give far, far more to actual charities, than the secular.
       
      It probably has more to do with cultural influences and worldviews within the various religious groups, than the specific moral values and empathy of the particular church/mosque/synagogue member.
      Because secular individuals don’t have the additional cultural influences, giving has to be a more conscientious personal choice for them.

      • Any proof of that statement?

    • That would be because Greenpeace actively seeks to impoverish people in favour of animals, while the Jehovah’s Witnesses actively seek to help impoverished people.

      Furthermore, even if one removes donations to their own church from the equation, religious people still give more per capita than non-religious people, and far more as percentage of income.

      I think that’s really all that needs to be said about that defensive comment. Methinks he doth protest too much.

      • Again, any proof of that?

        Also, you not only have to remove donations to their own religion but add in various other causes, such as greenpeace, sierra club, or humanitarians, that people give to because they believe it helps the world.

        Incidentally, which impoverished people do the JW’s seek to help, because I’ve never heard of them doing any sort of actual charity work — however, you obviously have, so I’m curious as to what.

        • Plus those who would give or give more but for not receiving a tax receipt.

  2. You left out the most interesting take on Quebec being the least giving – they believe the government will look after everything.

    “There’s another rationale that has been gaining currency in the past few years in Quebec. This one holds that because Quebecers are the highest-taxed citizens in Canada, the less fortunate among them should be able to rely on the generously funded state, not handouts from their taxed-to-the-max compatriots.”

    http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/Quebecers+should+shake+stinginess+tradition/5838256/story.html#ixzz1g5PmdbX8

  3. They’re told from childhood that an evil spirit will torture them for eternity if they don’t embrace a set of beliefs of which charity and giving is an integral part.  They give tithes as a requirement of the faith. And once a week they come together in a facility which often gives immediate concrete opportunities to get involved and do good in their community. 

    What kind of people would they be if they DIDN’T contribute more to charity?

Sign in to comment.