What we know—and have always known—about this moment in sexual harassment - Macleans.ca

What we know—and have always known—about this moment in sexual harassment

These stories of harassment exist on a spectrum, but they’re all about abuse of power as gratification, writes Tabatha Southey


US Democratic Senator from Minnesota Al Franken (R) with his wife Franni Bryson (L) walk to his car after his resignation speech on the Senate floor in the US Capitol in Washington DC, USA, 07 December 2017. Senator Franken announced his resignation from Senate amid sexual harassment allegations and a call from over half of the Democratic caucus. (Shawn Thew/EPA)

On Dec. 7, Democratic Senator Al Franken of Minnesota announced that he will shortly be resigning from the U.S. Senate. Franken has been accused of groping several women, mostly while they were having their picture taken with him, and of planting a few big, sloppy and decidedly unsolicited kisses on the mouths of women he met in a professional capacity.

Just weeks ago, in the wake of multiple allegations of sexual misconduct against him, distribution of comedian Louis C.K’s film I Love You, Daddy was cancelled, HBO suspended C.K.’s appearance on an upcoming Night of Too Many Stars, and Netflix announced they would not be producing his next stand-up special.

Both Franken and C.K. have admitted wrongdoing, although Franken seems to be having difficulty sticking to both his story and his “sorry,” which doesn’t look good on him. I’ve followed both these men’s careers admiringly and wish that all of that comedic and legislative work had been done by men who—unlike Franken, apparently—were consistently capable of spending a day glad-handing at a state fair without grabbing a stranger’s ass uninvited. Please, just eat a corn dog, down a funnel cake, guess the weight of a pumpkin, pose for some pics and go home, guys. This is not political rocket science.

I regret that C.K. masturbated in front of women he worked with, women who worked for him, and women who knew he metaphorically held their careers in his hands even as he literally held his penis in his hand. They should never have been put in that position.

What I don’t regret is C.K. or Franken or anyone else being called to account for their behaviour or much else about this Great Moment in Sexual Harassment History we’re currently witnessing. After all, these were not “crimes against property.” This wasn’t prop comedy, as bad as that would be, partly because it wasn’t comedic and also these things were done to women who were just going about their business. I believe some greater good will come of this little revolution via revelations.

MORE: Workplace harassment is the systemic rot that can’t be measured

There was a time, not so long ago at all, when people routinely said the same things we’re hearing now—“If it really bothered her, she’d have left”; “I bet he barely touched her”; “Look, it’s a private matter, it’s between them”; “She must have done something to get him going”—but they were talking about men beating their wives. We’re still far from perfect in that regard, but a societal shift did occur, and maybe what we’re experiencing now is another.

Yes, the talents of C.K. and Franken will be missed for as long as they’re gone, but I’d trade both these guys and Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose, two Garrison Keillors, a Mark Halperin, a half-dozen Harvey Weinsteins and all the others I don’t have the patience or the word count to name if it would start to make things right. It would be great if we could get all the women who scuttled quietly away back in this deal, but we can’t—and please consider that before you bemoan the “brain drain” taking place in the entertainment industry.

We will never know what work those women might have done, but film-wise, maybe everyone should have to sit through two hours of blank screen and think about that. Just one 20-minute “set” with no one onstage at the comedy club because I have no doubt that there have been talented women who never got to figure out how great they could be because when harassed, groped, coerced and humiliated, they walked away from the scene.

“Oh, but they should have had a thicker skin!” I hear some people cry. So let me tell you something that a lot of women figure out pretty quickly: You either walk away—get to safety—when that creepy, gropey stuff happens, knowing that leaving will likely get you accused of over-reacting, perhaps called “hysterical,” or you stay, in which case you will be held responsible for anything that happens afterwards as well as having to go through it. It’s the gamble you take.

WATCH: Sexual assault isn’t a women’s issue—it’s everyone’s issue

From the time you’re 14 and the dad driving you home from your babysitting gig reaches over and squeezes your thigh and says “Lookin’ good,” you are going to be, on some level, asked to account for what is done to you next. Growing up girl is partly about learning to get out of situations—short-term or long-term—that look bad or turn weird. It’s about managing your exits without hurting the feelings of the man involved or, God forbid, making him angry because there may be hell to pay if he loses his temper and then you’ll be asked, “Maybe you could have handled that a little better?”

Women play a non-stop game of Whac-A-Mole most of their lives, if the goal of Whac-A-Mole was to talk a mole gently back down to its hole without upsetting it or embarrassing it in front of its mole friends, just as another mole pops up. It’s ”I’m seeing someone else, Mole,” “I got another job offer, Mole,” “Oh, hey, Mole, you’re cute, but I have to go meet my brother.”

Most of what we’re seeing in the news about sexual harassment isn’t actually news to women because we already knew all this. All of it but the names. Well, some of the names were known, just as a lot of us know that there are women who would have merrily signed up to watch C.K. “defrag his hard drive”—but their willing participation was not what he desired. Similarly, most of us realize that a man as wealthy and powerful as Weinstein need never have spent a night alone and, listening to the stories of the many women who have credibly accused him of threatening, tormenting, sexually assaulting and raping them, we can surmise that consensual sex, a phone call away, is not what gets him off.

While these stories exist on a broad spectrum, they are about abuse of power as gratification, something these men felt entitled to at any cost, and about telling women what is first and foremost their place.

Many of us know all this, even if we’ve never known a successful film producer or politician. We understand that we are hearing these stories because they involve famous people and the stories of the famous get listened to, but that this is hardly a wild story from the decadent beyond.

Adjust for scale, and to me it looks a bit like this, a moment I’d forgotten until the  Weinstein story broke, and hardly the only story like this I know. When I was 17, I worked for a year in shoe store. It was a pretty good job. But one day, a coworker and I had an earnest discussion about our career prospects. She was about the same age as me and had just recently been hired, and she said to me quietly: “Well, you don’t want to work at ____ Jeans, you have to blow the boss,” and she shuddered ever so slightly, but somehow deeply, like it went all the way through her, and she glanced down awkwardly, shyly, for a “tough girl.” She’d worked at ____ Jeans.

The point is that if you have rent to pay, and are living paycheque-to-paycheque, and can’t afford a gap in your resume and are angling for that coveted “good reference,” you might desperately need to keep those five shifts locked down.

What we’re being told is not a “Hollywood” story: It’s just the story. A waitressing job can be a woman’s Titanic. Her boss may know that. The stakes vary, but the equation stays the same—and that’s what we need to change.



What we know—and have always known—about this moment in sexual harassment

  1. Yes!! A well-written, thoughtful commentary on the reality of these situations and what it is truly like to be a woman. Kudos to Tabatha. Power and shame/self-preservation sums it up perfectly.

  2. That’s the thing…..it’s not about sex, it’s about power.


    That time seems to be over.

  3. Another column on sexual harassment and assault by a progressive. And another column with no mention of Bill Clinton.

    Progressives caved on Bill Clinton’s sexual predation, and are still in denial. They still cannot mention his name.

    They set back Western Society for a generation by their silence and complicity.

    And they still do not point the finger.

    • Oh puleeze.

      • We have a denier in our mix that doesn’t believe the whole Bill affair wasn’t white-washed?

        The “leader” of the Democrats is in denial.

        “I just don’t believe any of that.”
        “I Don’t Think It’s Worthy of Comment”
        “I thought they’d look into it. But, you know, I just think a crazy person like Larry Nichols is not enough to get a story on the television with names in it.”
        “Well, that’s what I mean. You know, if all the people who are named . . . deny it . . . That’s all, I mean, I expected them to come look into it and interview you and everything, uh, but I just think that if everybody’s on record denying it, you’ve got no problem”

        –Hillary Clinton on allegations of Bill Clinton’s affairs.

    • Classic whataboutery

  4. As always, progressives devour their own, as a matter of principle.
    The GOP, on the other hand, will compromise anything and everything in order to get what they want.

    Don’t get me wrong. I’m onside with most of everything Tabatha mentions here.
    I’m 42, and looking back towards the first half of my life is like looking at a different universe when it comes to matters of gender equality. Without a doubt, there is still tons of BS now, but it is, thankfully, somewhat getting better. For those who expect more, right here and right now – you do realize there still are people (albeit it very old and very few) alive who actively participated in the Holocaust? My point being that change takes time, and is very much generational.

    I’m all about taking down the patriarchy, but sadly believe that in the grand scheme of things, some concessions must be made. In an age where propaganda is ruled by algorithms (and the people behind them), it is foolish to believe that taking out someone like Franklin will serve a higher purpose. I do not know him personally, and as such, can’t really weigh in on whether he is a creeper or not. I simply believe the stakes have become really high in politics, and these sorts of lynch mob demands are ridiculous. To have Weinstein and Franklin even remotely compared is simply staggering.

    In this day and age, it has become far to easy to magnify and minimize out of proportion.
    I long for the day when we can have the standards Tabatha is pushing for, but sadly do not feel that many of my gender are emotionally and intellectually mature enough for it just yet. I fear most of all that too much push will turn back the clock.

    • “but sadly do not feel that many of my gender are emotionally and intellectually mature enough for it just yet. ”
      So when is the time. Would you use this argument for any other criminal behaviour? Women should not have to live lives of accommodation for male failings. If men behaved with respect to all people they meet, regardless of sex, gender, orientation – the issue would disappear. This is learned behaviour. it is cultural not biological. Various cultures have developed rules and customs to deal with biological imperatives be it defecating in public to not eating your dinner guests (see Margaret Visser) Why is this issue of predation on females the one area that seems so hard to teach our youth about.

      • Indeed – it is very much learned behaviour.
        As such, the focus should be on educating younger generations so they do not carry on these repugnant traits. To expect an older generation to expunge the values they were raised with is a nice ideal, but nowhere near as realisticly feasible.

        (Applies tin foil hat)
        I think my bigger concern is my fear that we will be experiencing extreme volatility in government for the next few decades. So many jobs are going to evaporate throughout the next ten years. Honestly, despite his misgivings, I’d rather have someone like Franklin in gov’t compared to many of the other choices. In the polarized world we now live in, throwing him to the gallows seems to cause more harm than good. My hope is that future generations will be able to adhere to the equity that *should* be present. A shitty pragmatism.

  5. Under the photo you indicate Al Franken is a Republican. He’s not. He is a Democrat.

  6. “grabbing a stranger’s ass uninvited”

    Read the accusations carefully — nobody actually says he grabbed their asses. One says he touched her waist, the other says he touched the top side of her butt, wherever that is. Others were horrified that he gave them a big, friendly arms-round for picture embrace. Not ass-grabbing. I’ve had my ass grabbed. It’s not the same as what they’re describing.

  7. Yeah, it’s all about power.

    Women and men recognize that casual physical contact is part of human interaction. Everyone has always known that breasts and genitalia are off limits.

    Now women recognize that those rules can be changed when they play the victim card. But they want to make it retroactive.

    If you can’t prove that someone stole from you 10 years ago, and you never called the police then, but you decide to now, do you think you’ll even get your case before a judge? Hell no.

    Retroactive Justice. Hmmm. I hope we bring back the death penalty soon, before abortion is recognized as murder. That’ll solve any overpopulation issues.

    • No source, no sense, not sober.

  8. All presidents have had affairs…..Clinton was not an exception.

    You guys are always mixing your religion with your politics