7

A new Liberal plan for fighter jets doesn’t abandon the F-35

Last year’s Liberal election vows, which definitively ruled out the F-35, have fallen off the radar


 
Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. (Matthew Otero/AP)

Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. (Matthew Otero/AP)

You didn’t have to work too hard to grasp Justin Trudeau’s position, in last fall’s Liberal election platform, on Lockheed Martin’s cutting-edge but controversial F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. “We will not buy the F-35 stealth fighter-bomber,” the platform said. That was on page 70 of A New Plan for a Strong Middle Class, and in boldface, by the way, so you couldn’t miss it.

Except, unequivocal though it was, the promise doesn’t seem to have counted for much. No fewer than three cabinet ministers, plus the chief of defence staff, showed up just off Parliament Hill at the National Press Theatre this afternoon to announce a two-part plan to replace Canada’s aging CF-18 jets—and the F-35 remains very much in the multi-billion-dollar, multi-year hunt. Asked how that can possibly be, Public Services and Procurement Minister Judy Foote said it’s because the Liberals promised an “open and transparent competition” to choose Canada’s next fighter jet.

MORE: How far can the feds stretch those aging CF-18s?

And it’s true, they did. Just after the promise not to buy the F-35, the 2015 Liberal platform went on to say, “We will immediately launch an open and transparent competition to replace the CF-18 fighter aircraft.” How that vow could ever be reconciled with the preceding pledge to disqualify Lockheed Martin’s horse from the race has always been a mystery. But at least, voters might have imagined, the ultimate goal made sense: “We will reduce the procurement budget for replacing the CF-18s, and will instead purchase one of the many, lower-priced options that better match Canada’s defence needs.”

Are there really many, lower-priced, better options, though? Today’s news conference left all parts of that assertion wide open to doubt. The need to do something, however, isn’t. Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan was convincing on the need for a coherent plan to close Canada’s jet fighter capability gap. The Royal Canadian Air Force is down to 77 CF-18s from a peak of 138, and those still in the air are more than 30 years old. At times, that leaves Canada short of the planes needed to meet its core NORAD and NATO obligations.

RELATED: Campaign 2015: Is this the moment the Liberals take flight?

So Sajjan announced the government will “immediately explore” buying 18 Boeing Super Hornets, off the shelf, to supplement those vintage CF-18s on an interim basis, while launching a five-year competitive bidding process to select a permanent fleet of jets. Why consider only the Super Hornet for the interim fleet, if there really are many options out there? Well, Sajjan and Foote explained that Canada needs a plane that’s “inter-operable” with what the United States is flying, and the Boeing offering fits the bill. No need for a competition, evidently, to figure out the best fit, which makes the notion of a crowded field of genuine contenders for the bigger, longer-term buy seem unlikely.

As for that larger purchase to come later, Sajjan was asked directly if he could offer any assurances that it would prove less expensive than the F-35 program, which the former Conservative government had so maladroitly pursued. He did not make any commitment of the sort. Indeed, had Sajjan or Foote said today—as the Liberal platform did last fall—that many attractive, lower-cost options exist, that would have been odd, since the government has decided to remain a fully paid-up partner in the consortium that is developing the F-35.

Here’s what today’s news release from Sajjan, Foote and Innovation Minister Navdeep Bains had to say about keeping Canada’s options open when it comes to the Lockheed Martin plane: “Canada will continue participation in the Joint Strike Fighter Program until at least a contract award for the permanent fleet. This will allow Canada to maximize benefits of the partnership and gives Canada the option to buy the aircraft through the program should the F-35 be successful in the competitive process for the permanent fleet.”

So the upshot of today’s announcement, for anyone who cares to look at it alongside last fall’s Liberal platform, is as follows. The F-35 is still very much in the running, even though the Liberals promised it would be excluded. The notion that there are many fighter jet options available, as the Liberal platform said, is undermined by the fact that, faced with the need for a suitable interim jet, only the Super Hornet fit the bill. And the appealing idea that whatever jet option is finally selected will be much cheaper than the F-35 appears no longer to be part of the message.


 

A new Liberal plan for fighter jets doesn’t abandon the F-35

  1. Read the press release. The current talk of the F-18 is for a lease, not an outright buy that they would keep beyond the “competition” winner. Given that, why would Boeing lease them to Canada without having a market for their resale in 5-8 years?

    “In addition, Canada will immediately explore the acquisition of 18 new Super Hornet aircraft to supplement the CF-18s until the permanent replacement arrives. The Government will enter into discussions with the U.S. Government and Boeing regarding use of these jets for an interim period of time. “

  2. More BS from the Liberal cabal. The Commander of the RCAF has already stated that there is no credibility cap. The Libs are playing politics again and pushing this issue into the next election cycle. Even the MSM thing they’re full of you know what.

  3. Okay…we heard nothing but complaining on this file when the cons were running the show so come on, let’s hear about it, Em, Keith, Gayle and the rest of the Lib base. How is we need these planes now when we didn’t before?

    • Please read:

      aviationweek.com HOME > DEFENSE > CONTROVERSY FLARES OVER F-35 AIR COMBAT REPORT

      Then, be quiet.

      • I read your comments regarding the unsuitability of the F-35 so why is Canada still participating in the F-35 development program as it says in the article. Why doesn’t our defence minister quote your source? Report back and then be quiet.

        • …..unless you have something to comment on the Libs access for pay fund raisers and why that doesn’t count in the warnings of Trudeau to his caucus to avoid “conflict of interest or the appearance of interest.” You know, the first one he sent out…when he was promising Canadians to do better than the previous government.

        • Continued Canadian contributions to F-35 Program development is independent of the eventual decision to procure the Program down the road in 5 yrs whathaveyou. It is a proactive gesture to the Program ensuring Canadian aerospace industry is a long-term player in producing the plane, regardless of the ultimate procurement decision. Anyhow, waiting 5 years to potentially procure the F-35 would suggest block 4, a far superior model to the immature and yet to be proven block 3. That is, giving more certainty to decision process would seem to be the more prudent way to go. God speed.

Sign in to comment.