Behind the scenes with Canada’s lead climate conference negotiator

The Liberals want an ambitious agreement at the Paris climate talks. Meet the woman who’s trying to get us there.

Francois Hollande receives Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, for a working lunch at the Elysee palace.

Francois Hollande receives Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, for a working lunch at the Elysee palace.

Louise Métivier is caffeine-deprived. The lines for coffee at the Paris climate conference are long and slow-moving, and this morning security stopped her from bringing in liquids from outside the COP21 site. Métivier is in serious need of a shot of espresso: as Canada’s chief negotiator for climate change, she’s spending long hours locked in meeting rooms deciding what steps the world will take to limit global warming.

“I love coffee!” she laughed. “And it helps, if you can get your hands on one.”

metivierMétivier is surprisingly chipper given the hours she’s been keeping as the top Canadian at the climate talks. But then the two weeks of negotiations in Paris, which started Nov. 30 and will end Dec. 11, are like the Olympics for climate policy geeks and environmentalists. Métivier and negotiators from every other country sit on white leather chairs around an enormous table and work their way, phrase by phrase and sometimes word by word, through a 54-page document that will form the basis for an agreement to lower greenhouse gas emissions from 2020 to 2030. The job is surprisingly physical, according to people who have worked on negotiating teams at previous international environmental talks.

Related: Optimism not enough to ensure Paris climate deal

“[It’s] long, long days,” Métivier told Maclean’s in an interview in Paris. That means not enough food or sleep: she’s up at 6 a.m. to make sure she gets at least one solid meal, but rarely finds time to eat during the day unless someone puts a sandwich in her hand. The negotiators keep snacks in their bags, she said, and nibble on those. And when the talks adjourn for the night, there’s more work to be done, including briefing the people back in Ottawa. In this case, they’re six hours behind Paris, so the briefings have to be at the end of the day. “It evolves fast so you still have to do a lot of work when you get back to your hotel just to make sure everybody is well ready for the next day,” Métivier said. This kind of negotiation also takes an exhausting amount of focus. “Every word is important. Every issue that’s raised by somebody else, you have to be really listening because things evolve by the hour and you need to make sure you’re concentrating all the time,” she added.

Related: The rhetoric around climate change leadership has to change

But, like an Olympian, you could say Métivier’s spent her career training for this. Raised in Granby, Que., she earned her degree in economics at the University of Sherbrooke before moving to Ottawa to work for the federal government. She spent 16 years working on energy efficiency programs at Natural Resources Canada and landed at Environment Canada in 2005. Her career has revolved around energy policy and climate change, as well as stakeholder and provincial relations. That included four years where she led the federal effort to develop a national air quality management system, which all of Canada’s environment ministers endorsed.

The process to set up that system was so successful that Métivier’s former boss, Paul Boothe, uses it as a case study in his new role running the Lawrence National Centre for policy and management at Western’s Ivey Business School (Boothe is also a contributor to Macleans.ca).

Métivier’s work on air quality is great preparation for her new job representing Canada at the climate talks, said Boothe, the former deputy minister of Environment Canada. “She’s very determined to get where she needs to go, but over the years has learned to be patient,” he said. “She knows you don’t give up—if it’s not today, maybe it’s tomorrow.”

Related: Expectations build for Canada at Paris’s now-or-never climate summit

Louise Métivier, right, briefs climate activists with Catherine McKenna, centre. (Photo from Elizabeth May, on Twitter)

Louise Métivier, right, briefs climate activists with Catherine McKenna, centre. (Photo from Elizabeth May, on Twitter)

Patience will serve her well in Paris, as the UN talks are consensus-based, and progress in the main plenary room has been so slow this week they were at one point going backwards. But the side conversations are going better, according to observers at the conference. The “spinoffs,” as they’re known, allow smaller groups of countries to hold more narrowly focused discussions before returning to the main talks and hopefully moving things along.

Keeping in touch with the people in the spinoffs, tête-a-têtes with the co-chairs of the plenary session and major players like the EU, and briefings for the rest of the Canadian delegation pile on yet more meetings for our chief negotiator. At this point, however, she knows all the players well: they’ve all spent nearly a year in preparatory meetings and unofficial negotiations.  took on the job last January, and can’t count how much time she’s spent on international flights since then. A pace that had already cost her every long weekend in 2015 ramped up further with a new government elected six weeks before the talks started.

Still, Métivier exudes energy, and says the Canadian team is really engaged in the talks. “I’m extremely excited about this job. That keeps you going.”


Behind the scenes with Canada’s lead climate conference negotiator

  1. One should note, one of the main sticking points is coming from these little 3rd world corrupt shitzholes who insist on some type of international tribunal to make sure the developed world pays the $100Billion annually to the aforementioned corrupt dictatorships.

    If there is any doubt that the entire global warming hysteria is nothing more than a wealth distribution scheme…………you need to give your head a shake.

    it’s all about the money.

  2. Ms Payton,

    If you insist upon writing ONLY about one topic, the least you can do is try to uphold some professional standards. At least try and write about both sides of the argument; because frankly, simply because you only CHOOSE to write about one side of the issue does not make the debate settled.

    There are many respectible scientists (real scientists…not frauds like M. Mann, or Suzuki) who have raised legitimate points, and provided REAL verifiable science (there is NONE on the side of the debate you seem to support).

    Until you can provide both sides of the story, you are not seen as a real journalist. You’re just another shill and lack any credibility. No hash jobs………actually have a look and see if you can set aside your bias long enough to do your readers justice. they deserve to know the truth.

    • By “real scientists”, jameshalifax means, a theatre critic, a mining geologist who believes volcanoes emit more co2 than humans, a hereditary peer with a journalism degree who claims to have cured AIDS, and a guy who got an ecology degree 40 years ago and has never worked as a scentist.

      They’d publish their findings if all of the science journals weren’t part of the conspiracy, so they make videos and write editorials.

      • Tresus,

        both volcanos and forest fires emit more CO2 than humans. In fact, natural decay of vegetation emits far more than humans as well…..including Methane which is even more damaging according to the theory.

        as for that “theatre critic”……….he is well known for taking to task some of the most “educated” people…and making them look like the frauds they are.

        That’s the interesting thing about you Tresus……you look at someone’s credentials, and ignore what they are actually saying, or telling you. someone could tell you the earth is the centre of the univers (actually, that was the consensus a while ago…and I’m sure you would have discredited the one guy who said it wasn’t true) and you would believe it. Frankly tresus, if you ever do learn to think on your own……it would make this site a little less interesting.

        Keep up the ignorance.

        • Ah, no.
          Humans emit on the order of 100x more co2 than volcanoes.

          And it looks like you’ve got another paper in the works! I can’t wait to read how plants increase the levels of CO2 in the atmosphere by capturing it from the atmosphere and releasing it back when they burn and decompose!

          ” ignore what they are actually saying”
          I’m unaware that your theatre critic has produced a single scientific paper on the topic. Of course if I’m wrong I’d be more than happy to read what he’s actually saying.
          By the way, I’ve got a tooth that’s been giving me some trouble. Does he also practice dentistry?

    • Halifax’s James
      Provide a few references to peer reviewed publications by your “scientists”, and you may get some much needed credibility

Sign in to comment.