/
1x
Advertisement

True North Strong Free. Subscribe today.

Jean Chretien
Chris Young

Is Chretien’s Attawapiskat suggestion an antagonistic one?

The ex-PM suggested remote communities like Attawapiskat are economically unviable, and residents may have to move
Add as preferred on Google(opens in a new tab)

He mentioned the unmentionable. Jean Chrétien—the former prime minister and former minister of what was once called "Indian Affairs"—suggested that one solution the tragic situation in Attawapiskat might be to move the community. He argued that isolated communities might never be economically viable. "There is no economic base there for having jobs and so on," he said on Tuesday, "and sometimes they have to move, like anybody else."

It is an explosive suggestion that some see as a legacy of the thinking that led to the residential school policy. Others see it as simply the hard truth we can’t ignore. Does it make sense to ask or is it an antagonistic idea?

Read Joseph Boyden’s story on why investment and education will help Attawapiskat.

Read Scott Gilmore on why Attawapiskat residents should consider leaving their land.

Advertisement

Get the Best of Maclean’s straight to your inbox.

Sign up for news, commentary and analysis. Join 60,000+ Canadian readers.

By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.