Harper government approves CNOOC and Petronas deals

Acquisitions of Nexen and Progress Energy will go through

In this April 25, 2012 photo, Nexen chief executive Kevin Reinhart addresses the company's annual meeting in Calgary. (Jeff McIntosh/CP)

The Harper government has approved both CNOOC Limited’s $15.1-billion acquisition of Nexen Inc. and Petronas’ $5.2-billion acquisition of Progress Energy Resources Corp., while announcing new guidelines for foreign investment in Canada.

In separate statements released after North American markets closed on Friday, Industry Minister Christian Paradis said he was satisfied that the acquisitions by Malaysia’s Petronas and China’s CNOOC were likely to be of net benefit to Canada. Paradis said both companies had “made significant commitments to Canada in the areas of: governance, including commitments on transparency and disclosure; commercial orientation, including an adherence to Canadian laws and practices as well as free market principles” and “employment and capital investments, which demonstrate a long-term commitment to the development of the Canadian economy.” Initially, Malaysia’s Petronas $6-billion bid for Progress Energy was rejected by the federal government and the company later revised its proposal.

“Our statements today will not satisfy everybody,” Prime Minister Stephen Harper said shortly after the announcements were made. “Some believe you are either ‘for’ foreign investment under all circumstances, or that you must be ‘against’ foreign investment under any circumstance. Practical government rarely permits such simplicity.”

Prime Minister Stephen Harper delivers a statement regarding the federal government review of takeovers on Dec. 7, 2012. (Fred Chartrand/CP)

Under the new guidelines, the acquisition of oil sands companies by foreign state-owned enterprises will only be found to constitute a new benefit for Canada in “exceptional circumstances.” And, despite today’s decision on Nexen, the prime minister seemed eager to draw a line on such investments, saying these decisions marked “not the beginning of a trend, but rather the end of a trend.”

“To be blunt, Canadians have not spent years reducing the ownership of sectors of the economy by our own governments, only to see them bought and controlled by foreign governments instead. That was never the purpose of the Investment Canada Act. It is not an outcome that Canadians would ever support. It is not an outcome any responsible government of Canada could ever allow to happen,” the Prime Minister explained.

Beyond the oil sands, acquisitions by state-owned companies will be reviewed to consider the control or influence to be exerted on the Canadian business, the control or influence likely to be exerted on the larger industry and the control or influence likely to be exerted by the foreign government over the state-owned company.

“In light of growing trends, and following the decisions made today, the government of Canada has determined that foreign state control of oil sands development has reached the point at which further such foreign state control would not be of net benefit to Canada,” Harper said. “When we say that Canada is open for business, we do not mean that Canada is for sale to foreign governments.”

The Conservative government’s decisions drew mixed reviews.

David Detomasi, a professor of international business at Queen’s University, said the two deals forced Ottawa to clarify the Investment Canada Act’s “net benefit” test, which was used to quash the takeover of Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan two years ago. “I think the Harper government was caught a little bit flat-footed when these bids were made,” he says. “I think they realized that whatever precedent they set was going to be something they were going to have to live with. And that’s because there are likely other deals in the offing.”

Even so, it will be a tough balance for Ottawa to strike, according to Detomasi. Recovering crude from the oil sands is a massively capital-intensive business and there aren’t enough deep-pocketed Canadian companies capable of making the necessary investments. And many foreign companies—particularly those in China—are state-owned. “Unfortunately, they’re the ones with the cash.”

The opposition New Democrats declared themselves “profoundly disappointed” with the Nexen deal, suggesting that proper public consultation did not occur before the decision was made. “Canadians should be very apprehensive about the long-term economic and environmental consequences,” Peter Julian, the NDP’s natural resources critic, said in a release. “In the past, these kinds of takeovers have resulted in job losses. In October, the NDP called for the government to reject the CNOOC acquisition.

While saying that the Liberals welcome investment—”we do need investment in the oilsands and in other industries”—Liberal trade critic Wayne Easter also expressed concerns. “There’s still really no clarity. We still don’t know the details. We have no idea what those rules really are,” he said. “Are all state-owned enterprises being handled the same, whether it’s China or any other country? Should there be different criteria, given the strategic planning of some countries versus others? Is there reciprocity here? I’m led to believe there’s not. There should be reciprocity in terms of how Canadian investment in China is handled in a similar way to Chinese investment in Canada.”

Alberta Premier Alison Redford said her government was “pleased” with the Harper government’s decisions, but that Alberta would be seeking clarity on how “exceptional circumstances” will be defined.




Browse

Harper government approves CNOOC and Petronas deals

  1. deleted by poster

  2. Harper is unable or unwilling to define ‘exceptional circumstances’. How is this any clearer than ‘net benefit’?

  3. This seems like a reasonable approach, but why even approve the Nexen deal in the first place? I’m quite certain Nexen has a stake in some Oil sands development.

  4. Trudeau was a fool for supporting this issue. Just like Iggy was a fool when he supported extending the Afghanistan mission. Just like the Liberals were fools when they demanded Harper implement a stimulus package back in the fall of 2008 (it strengthened the recovery and allowed Harper to brag his government was responsible for it.)

    When playing political chess the goal is to put your opponents in a tight spot, not lend them a helping hand.

    The Liberals choose the oddest times to try and show they are above politics. Of course, they are wasting their time because few Canadians actually buy it…

    It’s better to play to win rather than fool around and let con men win. They don’t have to be a sleazy as the Harper Conservatives, but they have to get in the game. (Nice guys finish last, especially pretentious ones…)

  5. The jumped up office boy hasn’t got a clue. He is making it up as he goes along.
    Hardly a great poster boy for the economics profession or even Calgary Uni’s department of BS and sucking up to rich people.

  6. “To be blunt, Canadians have not spent years reducing the ownership of sectors of the economy by our own governments, only to see them bought and controlled by foreign governments instead. ”

    Really, Mr. Harper? Here I thought it was because we didn’t want our taxpayer money doing what could be done without it.. but it turns out Canadians just hate public organizations. Who knew?

  7. here’s the rules you got money its your’s..and im going somewhere warm and sunny… see ya suckers….nationalism doesn’t buy me my mansion..ex ceo of nexen…canada is open for business

  8. rant mode ON:

    Nexen only has a small stake in Syncrude (7%). It’s major oil sands project is a SAGD in situ project (Long Lake).

    80% of the recoverable oil sands oil is going to be recovered by in-situ SAGD type of recovery.

    Yet all this morning, CBC has rolling pictures of big oil sands mines. Less than 5% of the net worth of Nexen is tied up in any oil sands mine. So why is CBC rolling pictures of oil sands mines. Why don’t we actually get pictures of Nexen’s SAGD facilities, which don’t remotely look like a mine?

    Such is still the state of knowledge one of Canada’s major economic drivers in the elite-driven Toronto mainstream media.

  9. The test is whether or not a Canadian company could do the same thing with state resources in China. The answer is so obviously NO.

    The Conservatives will suffer the same fate as the BC Liberal will in the next election for betraying Canadians trust. 吸盤

Sign in to comment.